来源：央视新闻客户端 由中央纪委国家监委宣传部与中央广播电视总台央视联合摄制的电视专题片《一步不停歇 半步不退让》， 1 月 11 日在总台央视综合频道晚 8 点档播出第一集 《纠风治乱为民》，央视新闻新媒体平台同步播发。 党的作风就是党的形象，关系人心向背，关系党的生死存亡。风腐交织是现阶段党风廉政建设和反腐败斗争要着力解决的突出问题。要坚持正风肃纪反腐相 贯通，深入推进风腐同查同治，以"同查"严惩风腐交织问题，以"同治"铲除风腐共性根源，以"查""治"贯通阻断风腐演变。 享受着不法商人提供的美味佳肴，怎能体会贫困群众的急难愁盼。在不良作风的裹挟下，唐仁健的权力观、政绩观发生严重扭曲。他 热衷于大搞形象工程、 面子工程 ，究其根本，也是想给自己造声势、充政绩。 农业农村部原党组书记、部长 唐仁健： 当时问题主要出在，我觉得是政绩观，就是想把它搞大，因为在很多省一般就引进一个项目作为示范，但是在甘 肃，我跟他们商量一下就搞了八个，想争取在全国有一点影响。 中央纪委国家监委第八监督检查室副主任 周典： 因为项目脱离实际，项目建成之日就变成了产品滞销之时。 由于运营难以为继， 八个项目中一度有七个停摆，大量建成的 ...

Core Points - The case of Chen Hua, former deputy mayor of Hezhou City, Guangxi, has been transferred to the prosecution for alleged bribery [1][5] - Chen Hua's involvement in the failed tourism projects in Fuchuan County has raised concerns about mismanagement and misuse of public funds [2][4] Group 1: Allegations and Investigations - Chen Hua is accused of leveraging his official positions to gain illegal benefits and accepting substantial bribes [1][5] - The Guangxi Autonomous Region's supervisory committee concluded the investigation and referred the case to the prosecution [1] - The prosecution has informed Chen Hua of his legal rights and has begun formal proceedings against him [1] Group 2: Project Mismanagement - In 2017, Chen Hua approved tourism projects in Fuchuan County without adequate risk assessment, leading to financial losses [2] - The total investment for the "Water Show" and "Light Festival" projects was over 22.3 million [2] - Both projects ceased operations within a year due to poor financial performance, resulting in significant public discontent [2] Group 3: Disciplinary Actions - Chen Hua was expelled from the Communist Party and removed from public office due to severe violations of party and governmental regulations [4][5] - His actions included accepting gifts and engaging in corrupt practices, which were deemed detrimental to public interests [4][5] - The disciplinary measures were approved by the regional party committee and included confiscation of illegal gains [5]

Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the prevalence of "image projects" that become "development traps," leading to inefficient use of funds and hindering local development [1] - Significant investments, such as millions spent on fitness centers and government information systems, often result in projects that are left unused or abandoned, reflecting poor planning and execution [1] - The focus on superficial achievements over substantive development leads to a misallocation of resources that should be directed towards improving public welfare and infrastructure [1] Group 2 - To address the issue of image projects, it is essential to reform the evaluation system, prioritizing indicators related to public welfare, debt risk management, and ecological sustainability [2] - There is a call for enhanced oversight of major projects to ensure transparency in decision-making and accountability for public spending [2] - The ultimate goal of economic development should be to better safeguard and improve the lives of citizens, necessitating a shift towards high-quality development strategies [2]

Core Viewpoint - The revised regulations emphasize the prohibition of wasteful "image projects" and "performance projects," aiming to prevent significant decision-making errors that lead to severe waste [1] Group 1: Issues with Current Projects - There is a persistent issue with "half-finished projects" that result from insufficient funding, incomplete procedures, and a disconnect between planning and implementation, leading to wasted resources and economic losses [1][2] - Examples of failed projects include museums becoming storage facilities, abandoned specialty town projects, and luxury charging stations in remote areas lacking proper grid support [1] Group 2: Underlying Problems - The prevalence of "half-finished projects" may be linked to corruption and poor work ethics, with some officials focusing on creating eye-catching projects for personal gain rather than genuine community benefit [2] - A short-sighted and profit-driven mindset contributes to the ongoing issues, highlighting the need for a long-term approach to project management and community welfare [2] Group 3: Solutions and Recommendations - Addressing "half-finished projects" requires comprehensive strategies, including thorough investigations into underlying issues and establishing accountability systems for major projects [2] - Emphasis on improving the entire lifecycle management of government investments, ensuring feasibility studies are conducted, and enhancing supervision during construction and operation phases [2] - Existing "half-finished projects" should be revitalized by repurposing unused resources to better serve community needs, such as converting idle office buildings into training centers [3]

Core Viewpoint - The revised "Regulations on Strict Economy and Opposition to Waste in Party and Government Agencies" aims to address new issues of extravagance and waste, enhancing management mechanisms to ensure that government agencies practice frugality while improving the lives of citizens [1] Group 1: Regulations and Guidelines - The new regulations provide specific guidelines on wasteful behaviors, particularly in the area of official receptions, mandating strict adherence to standards for accommodation, meals, and transportation costs [1] - The regulations emphasize that work meals should not include high-end dishes, cigarettes, or alcohol, reflecting a significant shift in public expectations regarding government spending [2] Group 2: Public Reception and Spending - There is a growing public demand for stricter regulations on official receptions, highlighted by reports of excessive spending on receptions by local government departments [2] - The case of Guizhou Moutai's shareholder meeting, which replaced traditional alcoholic beverages with a non-alcoholic drink, illustrates a corporate response to the new regulations [2] Group 3: Decision-Making and Accountability - The regulations stress the importance of correct performance views among leaders, prohibiting wasteful "image projects" and emphasizing the need for rational decision-making to prevent significant financial losses [3] - Examples of past mismanagement, such as the construction of unnecessary projects leading to substantial debt, underscore the need for accountability in government spending [3] Group 4: Implementation and Supervision - The regulations call for frugality in evaluation and recognition activities, prohibiting debt accumulation for such initiatives [4] - The challenge remains in ensuring that these regulations are actionable and that supervision is effective in curbing wasteful practices [4]