（来源：中国改革报） 转自：中国改革报 □ 汪楚妍 我国现代法治建设的成效经验 新时代以来，我国法治建设已进入加快发展、全面推进、系统集成的新阶段。一方面，通过落实《法治 中国建设规划（2020—2025年）》，立法工作呈现"量质齐升"态势，法规体系日趋完备，覆盖经济、社 会、生态、民生等领域。另一方面，通过机制与技术创新，将我国优秀传统法律文化中"德法共治""礼 法并用""谦和礼让""以和为贵"的法治智慧，融入司法实践和基层治理。 在现代法治建设中，通过对优秀传统法律文化创造性转化，形成了中国特色法治发展路径。以传统"礼 法合治"思想为核心，法治建设实现立法、执法、司法、守法各环节协同推进。"民惟邦本"思想在现代 法治中转化为"以人民为中心"的实践导向，让法治建设扎根人民生活。传统"恤刑"思想在现代刑事司法 中转化为未成年人犯罪记录封存、社区矫正等制度，展现了司法的人文关怀。安徽省桐城市挖掘"六尺 巷"文化内涵，创新"六尺巷工作法"，组建调解团队、制定工作规程，将历史典故转化为可操作的现代 治理规范。我国现代法治建设正是在汲取优秀传统法律文化的基础上，实现了传统"德法共治"思想与现 代法治理念的融合、"情理 ...

（来源：新华日报） 基于民法原则本身具象化、生活化的特点，其在思政课堂中的教学实践，应着力于原则精神的阐发与内 化，而非对法典条文的体系化罗列。结合经典或热点案例，以价值思辨讨论为形式开展教学，是较为合 适的方法。例如，在讲解"诚信原则"时，可以选取不诚信的生活行为和法律意义上的不诚信案件进行比 较，引导学生进行讨论，帮助其养成契约精神，明晰法律之边界；在讲解"公序良俗"时，可以结合社会 或者网络上违背一般常理认知，但尚未触碰刑法惩处边界的案例进行讨论，使学生知晓如何利用法律原 则进行是非判断，以及违法和犯罪之间的区别和联系等。这种思政教育新范式能够将民法原则生动化、 具象化、生活化，实现法律知识向生活与社会交往智慧的转化，更能强化当代大学生对于社会现实的关 心与关注。 "大学之道，在明明德，在亲民，在止于至善"，古文中所说的"大学"指的是童蒙教育之后的大人之学、 君子之学，尽管与现代大学的含义不同，但其所指向的教育与学习任务却一脉相承。将民法原则融入思 政课堂，能够促使大学生在理论与现实的对照中、权利与义务的辨析中，深化对"德法共治"这一抽象理 念的理解，并自觉付诸实践，这有助于当代大学生顺利完成由校园进入 ...

Core Ideas - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding Chinese civilization's history to effectively promote the creative transformation and innovative development of traditional culture, particularly through the lens of "The Book of Songs" [1] Group 1: Governance Principles - The Zhou Dynasty established the principle of "de-based governance" which combines moral education with necessary punitive measures, laying the foundation for the concept of governance through virtue and law [2] - The governance philosophy of "respecting heaven and protecting the people" highlights the alignment of divine mandate with public sentiment, emphasizing the ruler's responsibility to earn the people's trust [3] - The principle of "明德慎罚" (clarity in virtue and caution in punishment) advocates for prioritizing moral education while using punishment judiciously, reflecting a balanced approach to governance [4] Group 2: Judicial Practices - Zhou Dynasty judicial practices were characterized by efficiency, strict procedures, and a balance between leniency and severity, fostering a legal culture rooted in humanistic values [5] - The "甘棠决讼" (Gantang adjudication) model exemplifies local and public trial practices, enhancing trust in the judicial system by addressing cases in proximity to the people [6][7] - The early exploration of litigation procedures established a clear hierarchy in judicial processes, ensuring fair trials and promoting social harmony through mediation [8] Group 3: Punishment and Legal Principles - The principle of moderate punishment emphasizes the need for proportionality in sentencing, avoiding excessive severity while ensuring justice is served [9] - The Zhou Dynasty's governance model integrated moral education with legal enforcement, creating a comprehensive system that balances soft and hard governance methods [10][12] Group 4: Community and Family Dynamics - The governance system relied on the interaction between the state and grassroots communities, utilizing mechanisms like "采风" (collecting public opinion) to adjust policies based on public sentiment [13][14] - The family structure under the Zhou Dynasty served as a foundational element for social order, with familial authority playing a crucial role in maintaining societal stability [15] Group 5: Cultural Integration - The teachings of "The Book of Songs" served as a vehicle for moral education, embedding ethical norms into daily life and promoting a culture of compliance with social rules [11] - The integration of music and governance was seen as a means to harmonize societal relations, reinforcing the idea that moral education and legal enforcement should complement each other [12] Conclusion - The insights derived from "The Book of Songs" reflect the wisdom of ancient Chinese governance, offering valuable resources for modern societal governance and the innovative development of traditional culture [16]