Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the concept of "orthodox Americans" and the divide between this group and a new political class in the U.S., highlighting the implications of this divide on identity and immigration policies [1][4]. Group 1: Definition and Discussion of "Orthodox Americans" - "Orthodox Americans" are described as individuals with ancestral ties to the U.S. Civil War, emphasizing a connection to Anglo-American heritage and historical roots [1][2]. - The term has gained traction among right-wing circles, with discussions on who qualifies as a "true American" varying based on personal backgrounds and ideologies [2][3]. - Jay Engel, a writer, popularized the term while asserting that it does not equate to racism, yet he emphasizes the superiority of European cultural standards [2][3]. Group 2: Political Implications and Rhetoric - The concept of "orthodox Americans" is linked to political strategies, with figures like Vice President Vance arguing that those with historical ties to the U.S. have greater rights than those who view American identity as abstract [2][4]. - The rhetoric surrounding "orthodox Americans" serves to create a political narrative that is more palatable to the public compared to direct references to "whiteness" [3][4]. - The rise of conspiracy theories, such as the "Great Replacement," reflects a growing support for policies aimed at large-scale deportations of immigrants, driven by fears of demographic changes [4][5]. Group 3: Policy Framework and Future Directions - The term "orthodox Americans" is seen as a framework for justifying policy changes, particularly in relation to immigration and citizenship laws [4][5]. - Recent government actions, such as denying automatic citizenship to children of non-citizen parents, are viewed as steps towards redefining who qualifies as an American [4]. - The article suggests that there is a concerning trend among some U.S. politicians to adopt extreme measures regarding immigration, echoing sentiments found in European right-wing movements [5].

Core Points - The article discusses the impact of Charlie Kirk's assassination on the Trump administration and the conservative movement in the U.S. [1][2][4] Group 1: Charlie Kirk's Influence - Charlie Kirk was a significant figure in the conservative movement, closely associated with Trump and his family, and led the organization Turning Point USA, which energized young conservatives [1][5][6] - Kirk's organization played a crucial role in shaping the MAGA movement and helped Trump secure a substantial number of young voters, particularly white males [6][7] - His influence extended beyond the Republican establishment, as Turning Point USA became a vital platform for conservative candidates seeking office [7] Group 2: Reactions to Kirk's Death - Following Kirk's assassination, there was a profound sense of grief within the Trump circle, with Trump expressing his sorrow and calling Kirk a "very good friend" [2][4] - Many prominent figures, including Democrats and former presidents, also expressed condolences and condemned political violence [4][5] - Trump's response included a national address where he attributed the violence to "radical left political violence," indicating a potential shift in political discourse following Kirk's death [5][14] Group 3: Kirk's Legacy and Future Implications - Kirk was seen as a potential future leader within the Republican Party, with speculation about his candidacy for various political positions, including the chair of the Republican National Committee [9][12] - His organization had raised significant funds, reportedly $85 million in 2024, showcasing its financial strength and influence in conservative politics [12] - The article suggests that Kirk's assassination may lead to a reevaluation of political violence and its implications for the future of the MAGA movement and the Republican Party [14][16]

Core Points - The article discusses President Trump's speech at the West Point Military Academy graduation, where he criticized "diversity, equity, and inclusion" (DEI) policies and emphasized a return to an "America First" military mission [1][3] - Trump claimed to have rebuilt the U.S. military, focusing on defeating adversaries and protecting the American flag [1] - He stated that the $1 trillion defense budget would not be reduced, asserting that cuts could be made in other areas [3] Summary by Sections - **Military Policy and Budget** - Trump affirmed that the defense budget of $1 trillion would remain intact, with no reductions planned [3] - He suggested that budget cuts could be made from other sectors instead [3] - **Critique of DEI Policies** - Trump vehemently opposed DEI policies, stating that the military's role is not to engage in cultural changes or to export democracy through force [3] - He criticized previous administrations for using the military as a testing ground for social and political agendas [3] - **Military Focus and Mission** - Trump emphasized a shift back to core military missions, which include defeating enemies and protecting national interests [1] - He expressed a desire to eliminate divisive concepts such as transgender policies and critical race theory from military training [3]