"斩杀线"现象所揭示的，是一种冷酷的"资本优先"制度逻辑：在这一逻辑下，制度安排系统性地将资本 安全与增值回报，置于劳动者生存保障与尊严之前。这导致当个体因遭遇风险而经济失能时，体系优先 考量的是如何隔离金融风险、保全资本价值，而非为民众提供足以恢复和缓冲的实质性支持，甚至不惜 以部分社会成员的牺牲为代价。正因如此，任何试图加固社会安全网、优化财富分配的真改革，一旦触 动这一根本利益结构，便必然举步维艰。 来源：求是网 当一个社会有如此庞大人群生活在"坠落"的恐惧中时，巨大的政治需求便会产生。近年来声势浩大 的"让美国再次伟大"（简称MAGA）运动，正是对这一社会问题的政治回应之一。然而，深入分析其施 政路线可发现，MAGA运动虽然以解决民众的经济不安全感为主要动员口号之一 ，但其政治承诺与"斩 杀线"所代表的生存焦虑之间，产生实质性脱节。 MAGA运动系统地将经济民生领域的公共诉求，引导并重构为文化身份领域的群体对抗。观察其政策 与宣传不难看出，该运动的核心策略，是将实在的经济压力，置换为对特定文化群体的指责：将困境归 咎于"窃取工作"的非法移民、"不公平竞争"的海外国家以及漠视民众的国内"精英"。它提供的 ...

（来源：求是网） 转自：求是网 （执笔：周璐铭） MAGA运动在其支持者内部，始终未能就如何解决民众面临的经济问题形成真正共识。最近，作 为MAGA运动重要风向标的"美国转折点"组织，在亚利桑那州凤凰城举行年度集会。在此次年会上， MAGA阵营内部矛盾公开激化，暴露出多重裂痕：一边高喊"反建制"，却因与"爱泼斯坦案"的牵连，使 其道德号召力大打折扣；一边宣称"美国优先"，内部却在是否无条件支持以色列等问题上激烈内讧；更 深层的分裂则触及国家认同：一方坚持基于宪法原则的公民身份，另一方则抱持更为激进、带有种族排 外色彩的基督教民族主义理念。这些争吵恰恰说明，一场以身份政治划线的运动，其内部联盟是十分脆 弱的，分歧与路线之争，使其难以在复杂的经济社会议题上形成统一、有效的解决方案。 MAGA运动虽以"美国优先"口号吸纳了民众在医疗、就业、住房等领域的普遍不满，但其政治实践 却回避了这些民生压力的深层根源，实则搁置了社会保障、财富分配等实质性改革。这导致美国政治陷 入一种空转状态：政治动员声势浩大，但普通民众的生计改善却停滞不前。这种政治回应能力与真实社 会需求之间的系统性背离，正是美国社会撕裂持续加深、难以弥合的 ...

Core Viewpoint - Donald Trump's return to the White House has significantly altered the U.S. approach to its allies and adversaries, emphasizing ideological divides over traditional democratic values, and focusing on a domestic political agenda rather than promoting democracy abroad [1][2][12]. Group 1: U.S. Foreign Policy Changes - Trump's administration has shown a preference for supporting far-right parties in Europe, such as Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Germany's AfD, while undermining traditional liberal values that have historically underpinned transatlantic alliances [2][4]. - The U.S. government perceives a political shift to the right in Europe, anticipating that many European nations are merely lagging behind the U.S. by one election cycle [2][11]. - Trump's support for European far-right parties is seen as a strategic move to maintain U.S. influence in Europe while reducing military commitments [4][12]. Group 2: Impact on European Politics - The rise of far-right political forces in Central and Eastern Europe, such as Viktor Orbán in Hungary and other populist leaders, has been facilitated by Trump's policies, which may lead to a fragmented Europe rather than a unified pro-Trump bloc [5][12]. - The political landscape in Europe is increasingly polarized, with far-right parties expressing positive views of U.S. politics, contrasting with mainstream voters who hold negative opinions [11][12]. - The emergence of a new political coalition in Europe, inspired by Trump's "Make America Great Again" movement, indicates a shift towards a more nationalist and conservative agenda across the continent [2][10]. Group 3: Economic and Geopolitical Implications - Trump's policies have led to a significant realignment in European geopolitics, with countries like Hungary seeking closer ties with China and distancing themselves from U.S. influence [16][18]. - The potential for a fragmented Europe raises concerns about the long-term stability of U.S. influence, as populist leaders may not align with U.S. interests on key geopolitical issues [12][18]. - The return of nationalist sentiments in Europe could lead to a resurgence of German militarism, which poses risks for regional stability and U.S. interests [19][20].

Core Points - The article discusses the contrasting perspectives on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the American Communist Party (ACP), highlighting the ACP's admiration for the CCP's people-centered development approach and its relevance to addressing social issues in the U.S. [1][2][5] - The dialogue between Wang Wen and Haz Al-Din explores the potential for socialist movements in the U.S. and the historical context of socialism in America, emphasizing the need for a new social order based on shared values rather than existing political structures [3][6][10] - The ACP's strategy involves building a foundation for public interest services and community organization in anticipation of potential systemic failures in the U.S. political system [9][12][20] Summary by Sections Section 1: Ideological Perspectives - The ACP views the CCP's development model as a valuable example for addressing the widening wealth gap and social issues in the U.S. [1][2] - Haz Al-Din argues that despite the U.S. being perceived as anti-communist, there is a significant sentiment for socialist principles among the American populace [5][6] Section 2: Current Political Climate - The article highlights the signs of a potential breakdown in the U.S. constitutional order, with increasing social unrest and dissatisfaction among citizens regarding the "American Dream" [6][10] - Haz Al-Din suggests that while a socialist revolution is unlikely under current conditions, extreme scenarios could lead to the ACP playing a crucial role in unifying the country [7][9] Section 3: International Relations and Cooperation - The ACP is actively seeking to establish connections with socialist and communist parties worldwide, particularly with the Russian Communist Party [19][20] - The ACP aims to redefine its understanding of global political dynamics, rejecting simplistic labels for countries like China and Russia, and focusing on the real struggles for national sovereignty and alternative economic models [20][21] Section 4: Learning from the CCP - The ACP has institutionalized the study of CCP history and ideology, recognizing its contributions to the development of Marxism-Leninism [21][22] - Haz Al-Din emphasizes the importance of understanding Xi Jinping's Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a comprehensive grasp of contemporary socialist theory [23][24] Section 5: Long-term Goals - The ACP has set a long-term vision for revitalizing the American communist movement, aiming for significant grassroots support by 2036 [26][27] - The party acknowledges the challenges ahead and emphasizes a gradual approach to achieving its objectives, likening the movement to a marathon rather than a sprint [27][29]

Group 1: Company Research - China Overseas Development - In H1 2025, the company achieved contract sales of approximately CNY 120.15 billion, a year-on-year decrease of 19.0%, ranking second in the industry[5] - The average selling price increased by 1% to CNY 23,500 per square meter, with a market share of 2.72%[5] - The company acquired land worth CNY 40.37 billion, with 86% of new land in first-tier and strong second-tier cities, leading the industry in land acquisition[6] - Revenue decreased by 4.3% to CNY 83.22 billion, with a gross margin of 17.4%, down 4.7 percentage points year-on-year[7] - The target price is set at HKD 19.35, with a buy rating, reflecting a potential upside of 35.4% from the current stock price of HKD 14.30[11] Group 2: Company Research - NetDragon - In H1 2025, NetDragon's revenue was CNY 2.38 billion, down 28% year-on-year, with a gross profit of CNY 1.7 billion, a decrease of 24.7%[17] - The gaming business generated revenue of CNY 1.74 billion, down 18% year-on-year, but showed signs of stabilization with a 11% increase in MAU for "Magic Domain"[18] - The company announced an interim dividend of HKD 0.5 per share and plans to return at least HKD 600 million to shareholders through dividends and buybacks over the next year[17] - The target price is adjusted to HKD 20.24, maintaining a buy rating, indicating a potential upside of 71% from the last closing price of HKD 11.14[20]

Core Points - The assassination of Charlie Kirk, a prominent figure in the MAGA movement, has intensified political tensions in the United States, leading to a national outcry and a divided response from both Republican and Democratic parties [1][17][18]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Charlie Kirk was shot on September 10, 2025, while addressing a crowd of 3,000 students at Utah Valley University [2][3][4]. - The shooting occurred around 12:20 PM, with Kirk being struck in the neck by a bullet from a rooftop approximately 200 yards away [7][8]. - Following the incident, chaos ensued on campus, and Kirk succumbed to his injuries later that evening [10][11]. Group 2: Political Reactions - President Trump ordered flags to be flown at half-mast across federal buildings until September 14, expressing deep sorrow over the loss of a close ally [14][15]. - Vice President Vance personally retrieved Kirk's body, highlighting the significance of his death within the political landscape [15][16]. - The assassination quickly became a contentious political issue, with both parties blaming each other for fostering a climate of violence [17][18]. Group 3: Charlie Kirk's Influence - Kirk, born in 1993, founded the organization "Turning Point USA" at the age of 18, aiming to combat liberal ideologies on college campuses [20][22]. - He gained prominence as a key figure in the MAGA movement, leveraging social media to mobilize young conservative voters [24][48]. - Kirk's organization has expanded to over 3,000 schools nationwide, significantly increasing its influence and financial resources, with annual revenue soaring from $4.3 million in 2016 to $92.4 million in 2023 [60]. Group 4: Broader Implications - Kirk's assassination has raised concerns about the rising political violence in the U.S., with experts warning of a "vicious cycle" where political polarization leads to hate speech and violence [70][71]. - The incident has sparked discussions about the potential for further escalation in political conflicts, with some commentators suggesting it could mark a turning point in American politics [19][81]. - The political landscape is increasingly characterized by extreme rhetoric and division, as evidenced by the reactions from both sides of the aisle following Kirk's death [78][80].

Group 1 - The assassination of Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative youth leader and ally of Trump, has shocked the American political landscape, leading to heightened tensions between the left and right [1][22][20] - Kirk was a key figure in the MAGA movement, representing the younger generation and utilizing new media to mobilize support among youth [20][21][28] - His death is seen as a significant loss for the MAGA movement, as he was instrumental in connecting with young voters and shaping conservative discourse [20][28][29] Group 2 - The political violence surrounding Kirk's assassination may escalate, with potential calls for revenge from the conservative camp, reflecting a growing tolerance for political violence in the U.S. [22][24][29] - Kirk's assassination could serve as a catalyst for further political violence, undermining rational discourse and leading to a more polarized and violent political environment [29][30] - The event highlights the fragility of American democracy, as the assassination of a key political figure can alter historical trajectories and political dynamics [30][32] Group 3 - Kirk's political positions reflect a blend of cultural conservatism and economic populism, appealing to younger voters facing economic challenges [10][15][17] - His critiques of the financial system and advocacy for addressing the economic struggles of the younger generation position him as a unique voice within the conservative movement [11][13][15] - The MAGA movement's future may be impacted by the loss of Kirk, as he was a bridge between traditional conservative values and the economic concerns of younger Americans [20][28][29]

Core Points - The tragic shooting of Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative activist and ally of former President Trump, occurred during a public event in Utah, leading to widespread attention and discussions about gun violence in the U.S. [1][2][11] - Kirk was a significant figure in the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement, known for his vocal support of conservative values and gun rights, which has sparked both admiration and criticism [4][5][12] Group 1: Incident Overview - On September 10, during an event at Utah Valley University, Charlie Kirk was shot, resulting in his death, which was confirmed by President Trump shortly after [1][2] - The shooting occurred shortly after Kirk was engaged in a discussion about gun violence, highlighting the irony of the situation [7][8] - The shooter was reported to have fired from a nearby rooftop, and law enforcement initially struggled to apprehend the suspect [9][10] Group 2: Background on Charlie Kirk - Charlie Kirk, born in 1993, was a notable conservative figure who co-founded Turning Point USA, an organization aimed at promoting conservative values on college campuses [3][4] - He gained prominence through public speaking and media appearances, advocating for issues such as gun rights and family values [4][5] - Kirk's influence among young conservatives was significant, as he helped shape the narrative around the MAGA movement [12][14] Group 3: Reactions and Implications - The shooting has prompted a wave of condemnation from both sides of the political spectrum, with leaders like President Biden and former President Obama denouncing the violence [11][12] - Analysts suggest that Kirk's death may exacerbate the already polarized political climate in the U.S., potentially leading to further violence [12][16] - Trump's response to the incident, including plans to honor Kirk posthumously, indicates an attempt to galvanize his base and reinforce the MAGA movement [14][16]

Core Points - The article discusses the impact of Charlie Kirk's assassination on the Trump administration and the conservative movement in the U.S. [1][2][4] Group 1: Charlie Kirk's Influence - Charlie Kirk was a significant figure in the conservative movement, closely associated with Trump and his family, and led the organization Turning Point USA, which energized young conservatives [1][5][6] - Kirk's organization played a crucial role in shaping the MAGA movement and helped Trump secure a substantial number of young voters, particularly white males [6][7] - His influence extended beyond the Republican establishment, as Turning Point USA became a vital platform for conservative candidates seeking office [7] Group 2: Reactions to Kirk's Death - Following Kirk's assassination, there was a profound sense of grief within the Trump circle, with Trump expressing his sorrow and calling Kirk a "very good friend" [2][4] - Many prominent figures, including Democrats and former presidents, also expressed condolences and condemned political violence [4][5] - Trump's response included a national address where he attributed the violence to "radical left political violence," indicating a potential shift in political discourse following Kirk's death [5][14] Group 3: Kirk's Legacy and Future Implications - Kirk was seen as a potential future leader within the Republican Party, with speculation about his candidacy for various political positions, including the chair of the Republican National Committee [9][12] - His organization had raised significant funds, reportedly $85 million in 2024, showcasing its financial strength and influence in conservative politics [12] - The article suggests that Kirk's assassination may lead to a reevaluation of political violence and its implications for the future of the MAGA movement and the Republican Party [14][16]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the political dynamics surrounding Donald Trump and Elon Musk, particularly focusing on Musk's recent actions that have put Trump in a difficult position regarding the Epstein case and the expectations of his MAGA supporters [3][11][12]. Group 1: Political Dynamics - Musk's recent tweets have reignited discussions about Trump's connections to Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting that Trump has not fulfilled his promises regarding the Epstein documents [4][21]. - MAGA supporters are expressing their discontent, with some even burning their MAGA hats as a form of protest against Trump [6][10]. - The article highlights a division among Trump's allies, with prominent figures calling for Trump to release the Epstein documents, indicating a potential fracture within the Republican base [8][10]. Group 2: Impact of Social Media - Musk's platform, X (formerly Twitter), has become a breeding ground for conspiracy theories and misinformation, amplifying the scrutiny on Trump [40][42]. - The article notes that Musk's ability to leverage social media to target disillusioned MAGA supporters could reshape the political landscape, potentially creating a new faction [45]. - The use of memes and AI-generated content on X has further fueled the narrative against Trump, showcasing the power of social media in modern political discourse [42][44]. Group 3: Conspiracy Theories - The article discusses the role of conspiracy theories in shaping the beliefs of Trump's supporters, who have long been fed narratives about elite corruption and cover-ups [24][26]. - Trump's previous promises to expose the Epstein documents have contributed to the expectations of his supporters, making his current stance appear hypocritical [21][31]. - The ongoing discourse around Epstein serves as a critical point of contention, revealing the fragility of the narratives that have sustained Trump's base [30][31].