提级管辖

Search documents
推动实现“提级一件,指导一片”
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-07-29 22:42
此外,对于部分涉及地方利益、风俗习惯的案件,通过上级法院提级管辖,以更高政治站位、更强司法 权威,切实防止地方保护,维护人民群众合法权益。例如,浙江省金华市中级人民法院提级审理的"某 外嫁人员子女诉某街道办事处不履行安置补偿职责案",妥善解决"外嫁女"及其子女能否享受村民补偿 安置待遇的矛盾纠纷,有效防止基层行政部门在拆迁补偿方案中对"外嫁女"及其子女作出差别对待,确 保相关群体合法权益得到平等保护。 《 人民日报 》( 2025年07月30日 11 版) (责编:杨光宇、胡永秋) 本报北京7月29日电 (记者魏哲哲)提级管辖是我国三大诉讼法明确规定的管辖制度,是上级人民法院 监督指导下级人民法院审判工作的重要抓手。最高人民法院29日发布《人民法院司法改革案例选编(十 四)》暨2024年度提级管辖典型案例,进一步提升各级法院适用提级管辖制度的规范性、精准性和积极 性。 据介绍,各级人民法院积极将涉及重大利益、具有普遍法律适用指导意义、存在重大法律适用分歧、可 能存在不当干预、疑难复杂新类型的一审案件交由高级、中级人民法院提级审理,充分发挥较高层级法 院政治站位高、政策把握准、协调力度大、抗干扰能力强、裁判指导 ...
最高人民法院发布4起提级管辖典型案例
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-07-29 02:21
Core Viewpoint - The implementation of the elevated jurisdiction system in China's judicial process is crucial for enhancing the supervision and guidance of lower courts, ensuring fair and efficient resolution of disputes, and promoting the correct and unified application of law [1][2]. Group 1: Overview of Elevated Jurisdiction - The Supreme People's Court has issued guidelines to strengthen and standardize the elevated jurisdiction and retrial processes, emphasizing the role of higher courts in unifying legal application and preventing local protectionism [1][2]. - The first batch of typical cases under the elevated jurisdiction was published in 2024, showcasing the practical application of this system [1]. Group 2: Characteristics of Typical Cases - The typical cases published demonstrate the effectiveness of elevated jurisdiction in resolving disputes efficiently and justly, particularly in areas with frequent similar cases [2]. - The cases highlight the establishment of clear adjudication rules for new types of cases, ensuring consistent legal standards across jurisdictions [3]. - Elevated jurisdiction has proven effective in preventing local protectionism, safeguarding the legal rights of vulnerable groups [4]. Group 3: Specific Case Summaries - Case 199: A series of trademark infringement disputes were resolved through mediation, establishing compensation standards and promoting awareness of intellectual property rights among local businesses [5][6][7]. - Case 200: The court clarified the legal nature of illegal foreign exchange trading involving virtual currencies, contributing to the maintenance of national financial security [9][10][11]. - Case 201: The court addressed the rights of "foreign married women" and their children in compensation claims, reinforcing gender equality and social governance [13][14][15][16][17]. - Case 202: The court clarified the application of international treaties in air cargo transport disputes, enhancing the protection of both domestic and foreign parties' rights [18][19][20][21][22].