关于推动解决政府采购异常低价问题的通知 财库〔2026〕2号 各中央预算单位，各省、自治区、直辖市、计划单列市财政厅（局），新疆生产建设兵团财政局： 为整治政府采购领域"内卷式"竞争，形成优质优价、良性竞争的市场秩序，现就推动解决政府采购异常低价问题有关事项通知如下： 一、加强政府采购需求管理 4.评审委员会基于专业判断，认为供应商报价过低，有可能影响产品质量或者不能诚信履约的其他情形。 采购人应当根据实际工作需要，综合考虑同类项目中标（成交）信息，以及市场供给和产业发展状况，材料、人工等市场价格，行业费用标准 等市场调查情况，形成科学、完整、清晰的采购需求，合理设定最高限价，为供应商竞争报价提供基础。未设定最高限价的采购项目，以采购 项目预算金额作为最高限价。 采购人要综合考虑技术、成本效益、促进竞争等因素，按照专业类型和专业领域，合理设置采购包。采购人可以引入全生命周期成本理念，在 采购文件中要求供应商对约定期限内的运营、维护、升级，专用耗材，处置报废等费用进行报价，作为评审因素，并在采购合同中明确，供应 商应当在约定期限内以不高于其报价的价格向采购人提供专用耗材或者相关服务。采购项目采用综合评分法的，应 ...

采购人要综合考虑技术、成本效益、促进竞争等因素，按照专业类型和专业领域，合理设置采购包。采 购人可以引入全生命周期成本理念，在采购文件中要求供应商对约定期限内的运营、维护、升级，专用 耗材，处置报废等费用进行报价，作为评审因素，并在采购合同中明确，供应商应当在约定期限内以不 高于其报价的价格向采购人提供专用耗材或者相关服务。采购项目采用综合评分法的，应当按照相关规 定科学合理确定价格、技术、商务等因素的分值和权重。 采购人应当重点加强对信息化建设项目和耗材使用量大的复印、打印、实验、医疗等仪器设备采购项目 的管理。对于信息化建设项目，采购人应当要求供应商严格落实相关开放性、兼容性标准和规范要求， 按合同约定提供服务；在系统运行过程中，供应商不得在国家规定和合同约定之外以任何名义向相关服 务对象收取费用。 二、强化政府采购异常低价审查 （一）采购人应当在采购文件中明确，政府采购评审中出现下列情形之一的，评审委员会应当启动异常 低价投标（响应）审查程序： 1.投标（响应）报价低于全部通过符合性审查供应商投标（响应）报价平均值50%的，即投标（响应） 报价 【大河财立方消息】1月21日，财政部发布关于推动解决政府采 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent measures taken by the Jiangxi Provincial Finance Department to address the issue of abnormally low bids in government procurement, aiming to shift the focus from price to quality and value in procurement processes [2][3][5]. Group 1: Background and Rationale - The occurrence of abnormally low bids in government procurement has led to increased project performance risks, compromised product quality, and instability in service supply [5]. - The need to curb and combat low-bid behaviors is highlighted as a pressing task to regulate the procurement market and promote high-quality development [6]. - The article references a national directive from the Ministry of Finance aimed at addressing this issue, which has informed the local measures [6]. Group 2: Key Measures - The notification outlines six main sections, focusing on enhancing procurement demand management, clarifying abnormal low-price situations, and strengthening process control [7]. - It emphasizes the importance of establishing a scientific and clear procurement demand based on actual needs and market conditions, including setting reasonable maximum prices [8]. - The introduction of a full lifecycle cost concept for projects involving significant operational maintenance and consumables is encouraged to prevent unfair competition through low initial bids [8]. Group 3: Abnormal Low-Price Situations - Specific criteria for triggering an abnormal low-price review process are defined, including bids that are 50% below the average of compliant bids or 45% below the maximum price [9]. - The evaluation committee is tasked with initiating reviews when bids are deemed excessively low, potentially affecting quality or contractual integrity [9]. Group 4: Digital Empowerment and Monitoring - The establishment of a digital warning mechanism through the Jiangxi Public Resource Smart Trading Platform is outlined, which will provide real-time alerts during the evaluation and confirmation stages [10]. - This system aims to enhance the identification of low-price risks and facilitate timely reviews by procurement units [10]. Group 5: Compliance and Accountability - The notification mandates that evaluation committees and procurement units must adhere to legal and regulatory standards when handling abnormal low-price warnings [11]. - Suppliers must provide cost justification during evaluations, and failure to do so will result in disqualification of their bids [11]. - The procurement units are responsible for verifying the existence of abnormal low-price issues before announcing results, ensuring accountability throughout the process [12]. Group 6: Implementation and Responsibilities - The notification specifies that procurement entities must take primary responsibility for setting procurement demands and ensuring compliance with contract terms [13]. - Supervisory bodies are tasked with guiding and managing the resolution of abnormal low-price issues, while financial departments are responsible for oversight [13]. - Legal accountability is established for evaluation committees that fail to conduct proper reviews, ensuring a closed-loop responsibility system [13].