特别提示 微信机制调整，点击顶部"仪器信息网" → 右上方"…" → 设为 ★ 星标，否则很可能无法看到我 们的推送。 随着政府采购领域整治串通投标（陪标）行为的广泛开展，通过串通投标（陪标）行为谋取高 价中标的现象得到了抑制。随之而来的，由于竞争加剧，恶意低价中标（成交）现象又浮出水 面，一些供应商抱着先低价中标（成交），然后再通过偷工减料、降低标准或高价履约等方式 获利的心态，恶意压低投标报价进行竞争，不仅扰乱了正常的政府采购秩序，更给采购人履职 和提供公共服务增加了难度。因此，如何有效遏制恶意低价竞争行为，成为采购人和各级政府 采购监管部门必须面对和解决的问题。财政部印发的《关于推动解决政府采购异常低价问题的 通知》（财库〔2 0 2 6〕2号，以下简称《通知》），为采购人和监管部门共同遏制恶意低价竞 争行为提供了"良药"。 《通知》从三个层面对如何解决异常低价问题提出了要求，即科学确定采购需求、精准识别异 常低价、严把合同履约关口。 加强政府采购需求管理 政府采购需求管理是政府采购活动的源头和基础。制定科学合理的采购需求，不仅能保证项目 实施有的放矢，更是防范异常低价的前提和根本。异常低价之所以会出现 ...

通知明确了评审委员会启动异常低价投标（响应）审查程序的几种情形。要求将异常低价投标（响 应）审查的启动原因、审查意见和审查结果在评审报告中记录，并随供应商提供的相关书面说明及证明 材料，以及评审委员会有关互联网浏览、查询历史一并归档。财政部门在投诉处理、监督检查中发现评 审委员会未按规定对异常低价开展审查的，依法予以纠正并追究评审专家的法律责任。 通知要求加强政府采购履约验收管理。对报价触发异常低价投标（响应）审查程序后仍中标（成 交）的供应商，采购人要重点关注其履约承诺、实际履约情况等。对可以分期实施的采购项目，实行分 期考核、分期验收、分期支付，及时掌握供应商履约进展。如供应商不履行合同或者未按合同约定履行 合同导致验收不合格的，采购人应当依法追究其违约责任。（记者曲哲涵） 【纠错】 【责任编辑:刘阳】 在加强政府采购需求管理方面，财政部要求，采购人要根据工作需要，形成科学、完整、清晰的采 购需求，合理设定最高限价，为供应商竞争报价提供基础；要综合考虑技术、成本效益、促进竞争等因 素，按照专业类型和专业领域，合理设置采购包；可以引入全生命周期成本理念，在采购文件中要求供 应商对约定期限内的运营、维护、升级 ...

通知明确了评审委员会启动异常低价投标(响应)审查程序的几种情形。要求将异常低价投标(响应)审查 的启动原因、审查意见和审查结果在评审报告中记录，并随供应商提供的相关书面说明及证明材料，以 及评审委员会有关互联网浏览、查询历史一并归档。财政部门在投诉处理、监督检查中发现评审委员会 未按规定对异常低价开展审查的，依法予以纠正并追究评审专家的法律责任。 通知要求加强政府采购履约验收管理。对报价触发异常低价投标(响应)审查程序后仍中标(成交)的供应 商，采购人要重点关注其履约承诺、实际履约情况等。对可以分期实施的采购项目，实行分期考核、分 期验收、分期支付，及时掌握供应商履约进展。如供应商不履行合同或者未按合同约定履行合同导致验 收不合格的，采购人应当依法追究其违约责任。 本报北京1月26日电 (记者曲哲涵)为整治政府采购领域"内卷式"竞争，财政部近日发出通知，就推动解 决政府采购异常低价问题提出明确要求。 在加强政府采购需求管理方面，财政部要求，采购人要根据工作需要，形成科学、完整、清晰的采购需 求，合理设定最高限价，为供应商竞争报价提供基础；要综合考虑技术、成本效益、促进竞争等因素， 按照专业类型和专业领域，合理 ...

关于推动解决政府采购异常低价问题的通知 财库〔2026〕2号 各中央预算单位，各省、自治区、直辖市、计划单列市财政厅（局），新疆生产建设兵团财政局： 为整治政府采购领域"内卷式"竞争，形成优质优价、良性竞争的市场秩序，现就推动解决政府采购异常低价问题有关事项通知如下： 一、加强政府采购需求管理 4.评审委员会基于专业判断，认为供应商报价过低，有可能影响产品质量或者不能诚信履约的其他情形。 采购人应当根据实际工作需要，综合考虑同类项目中标（成交）信息，以及市场供给和产业发展状况，材料、人工等市场价格，行业费用标准 等市场调查情况，形成科学、完整、清晰的采购需求，合理设定最高限价，为供应商竞争报价提供基础。未设定最高限价的采购项目，以采购 项目预算金额作为最高限价。 采购人要综合考虑技术、成本效益、促进竞争等因素，按照专业类型和专业领域，合理设置采购包。采购人可以引入全生命周期成本理念，在 采购文件中要求供应商对约定期限内的运营、维护、升级，专用耗材，处置报废等费用进行报价，作为评审因素，并在采购合同中明确，供应 商应当在约定期限内以不高于其报价的价格向采购人提供专用耗材或者相关服务。采购项目采用综合评分法的，应 ...

Group 1 - The Ministry of Finance has issued a notification to address "involution" in government procurement by introducing specific quantitative indicators for abnormal low-price bids [1] - If a supplier's bid is below 50% of the average bid from all suppliers, 50% of the second-lowest bid, or 45% of the maximum project price, an abnormal low-price review process will be initiated [1] - The review process requires suppliers to justify their bids with detailed cost calculations and supporting documentation, or their bids will be deemed invalid [1] Group 2 - The new standards shift the competitive landscape from a two-player game focused solely on price to a multi-player game where companies must consider the average and second-lowest bids [2] - This change encourages companies to price closer to the actual market value, moving away from the "involution" of low pricing, allowing for better profit margins for all winning bidders [2] - The notification also incorporates a "whole life cycle cost concept," requiring suppliers to include costs related to operation, maintenance, and disposal in their bids [2][3] Group 3 - The introduction of the whole life cycle cost concept transforms the bidding process into a long-term repeated game, where companies face legal consequences for non-compliance, affecting their future bidding opportunities [3] - A successful bidding history will enhance a company's reputation, leading to more favorable outcomes in future procurements [3] - The notification aligns with recent reforms in the pharmaceutical sector, emphasizing reasonable pricing over the lowest bid, benefiting patients, companies, and healthcare systems [3]

一、加强政府采购需求管理 关于推动解决政府采购异常低价问题的通知 财库〔2026〕2号 各中央预算单位，各省、自治区、直辖市、计划单列市财政厅（局），新疆生产建设兵团财政局： 为整治政府采购领域"内卷式"竞争，形成优质优价、良性竞争的市场秩序，现就推动解决政府采购异常 低价问题有关事项通知如下： 二、强化政府采购异常低价审查 （一）采购人应当在采购文件中明确，政府采购评审中出现下列情形之一的，评审委员会应当启动异常 低价投标（响应）审查程序： 1.投标（响应）报价低于全部通过符合性审查供应商投标（响应）报价平均值50%的，即投标（响应） 报价<全部通过符合性审查供应商投标（响应）报价平均值×50%； 采购人应当根据实际工作需要，综合考虑同类项目中标（成交）信息，以及市场供给和产业发展状况， 材料、人工等市场价格，行业费用标准等市场调查情况，形成科学、完整、清晰的采购需求，合理设定 最高限价，为供应商竞争报价提供基础。未设定最高限价的采购项目，以采购项目预算金额作为最高限 价。 采购人要综合考虑技术、成本效益、促进竞争等因素，按照专业类型和专业领域，合理设置采购包。采 购人可以引入全生命周期成本理念，在采购文件 ...

（来源：中国政府采购报） 各中央预算单位，各省、自治区、直辖市、计划单列市财政厅（局），新疆生产建设兵团财政局： 为整治政府采购领域"内卷式"竞争，形成优质优价、良性竞争的市场秩序，现就推动解决政府采购异常低价问题有关事项通知如下： 一、加强政府采购需求管理 采购人应当根据实际工作需要，综合考虑同类项目中标（成交）信息，以及市场供给和产业发展状况，材料、人工等市场价格，行业费用 标准等市场调查情况，形成科学、完整、清晰的采购需求，合理设定最高限价，为供应商竞争报价提供基础。未设定最高限价的采购项 目，以采购项目预算金额作为最高限价。 采购人要综合考虑技术、成本效益、促进竞争等因素，按照专业类型和专业领域，合理设置采购包。采购人可以引入全生命周期成本理 念，在采购文件中要求供应商对约定期限内的运营、维护、升级，专用耗材，处置报废等费用进行报价，作为评审因素，并在采购合同中 明确，供应商应当在约定期限内以不高于其报价的价格向采购人提供专用耗材或者相关服务。采购项目采用综合评分法的，应当按照相关 规定科学合理确定价格、技术、商务等因素的分值和权重。 采购人应当重点加强对信息化建设项目和耗材使用量大的复印、打印、实验 ...

为整治政府采购领域"内卷式"竞争，形成优质优价、良性竞争的市场秩序，财政部发布关于推动解决政 府采购异常低价问题的通知。采购人应当根据实际工作需要，综合考虑同类项目中标（成交）信息，以 及市场供给和产业发展状况，材料、人工等市场价格，行业费用标准等市场调查情况，形成科学、完 整、清晰的采购需求，合理设定最高限价，为供应商竞争报价提供基础。未设定最高限价的采购项目， 以采购项目预算金额作为最高限价。采购人要综合考虑技术、成本效益、促进竞争等因素，按照专业类 型和专业领域，合理设置采购包。采购人可以引入全生命周期成本理念，在采购文件中要求供应商对约 定期限内的运营、维护、升级，专用耗材，处置报废等费用进行报价，作为评审因素，并在采购合同中 明确，供应商应当在约定期限内以不高于其报价的价格向采购人提供专用耗材或者相关服务。采购项目 采用综合评分法的，应当按照相关规定科学合理确定价格、技术、商务等因素的分值和权重。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Finance has issued a notice to address the issue of abnormally low bids in government procurement, marking a significant shift from a focus on low prices to an emphasis on quality and effectiveness in the medical equipment market [4][7]. Group 1: Government Procurement Reforms - The new regulations aim to combat the persistent issue of low-price bidding in the medical equipment sector, which has been detrimental to product quality and patient safety [9][10]. - The notice introduces a closed-loop system focusing on "source control, process review, and post-responsibility," addressing previous challenges in identifying and managing low-price bids [10][12]. Group 2: Impact on Medical Equipment Market - The introduction of a full lifecycle cost concept in procurement will require consideration of ongoing maintenance and consumable costs, thereby preventing the common practice of low initial bids followed by high consumable prices [12][13]. - The new rules will enhance scrutiny of low-price bids, with specific criteria established to identify and reject bids that are excessively low compared to market averages [12][13]. Group 3: Industry Dynamics and Competition - The reforms are expected to shift the competitive landscape, pushing domestic companies to transition from a price-based strategy to one focused on value [14]. - Foreign brands may benefit from the new emphasis on quality and service, as their technological advantages can be better recognized under the new evaluation criteria [14][15]. Group 4: Innovation and Market Growth - The reduction of low-price competition is anticipated to lead to increased investment in research and development, fostering innovation within the industry [15]. - With a projected budget of 19.6 billion for medical equipment updates, the new policies are expected to direct funds towards high-quality products and services, enhancing the efficiency of public healthcare resource allocation [15].

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Finance has issued a notice to address the issue of abnormally low bids in government procurement, signaling a shift from a focus on low prices to quality and effectiveness in the medical equipment market [1][3]. Government Procurement Reform - The new draft aims to create a systematic governance framework to tackle the persistent issue of low-price bidding in government procurement, particularly in the medical sector [3][5]. - Pilot programs have been initiated in various free trade zones and cities to address the problem of abnormal low-price bids [3]. Abnormal Low-Price Bidding Issues - The medical equipment sector has seen extreme price reductions, with bids often significantly below market rates, raising concerns about quality and safety [4][5]. - Examples include a bid of 1,000 yuan for a 3 million yuan project, highlighting the risks associated with such low bids [4]. Impact on Industry Competition - Abnormal low-price bidding has led to a decline in the quality of medical equipment and services, affecting patient safety and healthcare outcomes [5]. - The competition has forced some manufacturers to shift focus from R&D to lower-end products, hindering the advancement of domestic brands [5]. New Procurement Guidelines - The draft emphasizes a full lifecycle cost approach, requiring that ongoing maintenance and consumable costs be considered in bid evaluations [6]. - It introduces a two-stage evaluation process for complex equipment, ensuring that quality is prioritized over price [6]. Monitoring and Accountability - The draft outlines clear criteria for identifying abnormal low-price bids, aiming to prevent extreme cases from occurring [7]. - Suppliers will be required to provide cost breakdowns, and the evaluation committee will verify prices against market standards [7]. Market Restructuring - The new regulations are expected to shift market dynamics, concentrating resources on high-quality companies and altering the competitive landscape between domestic and foreign brands [8][9]. - Domestic companies must transition from competing on price to emphasizing value, or risk losing market share [9]. Opportunities for Foreign Brands - Foreign brands may benefit from the new focus on quality and lifecycle costs, allowing them to leverage their technological advantages in the market [10][11]. - The policy changes will require foreign companies to adapt their pricing strategies and enhance local services to maximize their market potential [11]. Innovation and Development - The new policies are anticipated to foster innovation within the industry, encouraging companies to invest in R&D and focus on developing innovative medical devices [11]. - With a significant budget for medical equipment updates, the new regulations will direct funds towards high-quality products and services, promoting a transition to high-quality development in the industry [11].