根据告发信内容，2024年8月26日，高市早苗所属的自民党奈良县第2选区支部从东京都的一家企业 收到了1000万日元的捐款。 记者当地时间12月4日获悉，针对日本首相、自民党总裁高市早苗担任代表的自民党支部在2024年 违规收取来自企业的捐款一事，日本神户大学教授上胁博之当天向奈良地方检察院提交了告发信。 日本《政治资金规正法》根据企业规模规定了其在一年内可向政党捐赠的最高金额。根据这家企业 的规模，当年的捐赠上限为750万日元。 ...

根据告发信内容，小泉进次郎所属的自民党神奈川县第11选区支部在去年12月10日，从大阪府的一 家企业收到了1000万日元的捐款。 2025.12. 04 本文字数：536，阅读时长大约1分钟 来源 | 央视新闻客户端 据央视新闻记者4日获悉，针对日本防卫大臣小泉进次郎担任代表的自民党支部违规收取来自企业的 捐款一事，日本神户大学教授上胁博之向横滨地方检察院提交了告发信。告发信日期为本月3日。 微信编辑 | 格蕾丝 第 一 财 经 持 续 追 踪 财 经 热 点 。 若 您 掌 握 公 司 动 态 、 行 业 趋 势 、 金 融 事 件 等 有 价 值 的 线 索 ， 欢 迎 提 供 。 专 用 邮 箱 ： bianjibu@yicai.com （注：我们会对线索进行核实。您的隐私将严格保密。） 推荐阅读 日本《政治资金规正法》根据企业规模规定了其在一年内可向政党捐赠的最高金额。根据这家企业的 规模，当年的捐赠上限为750万日元。 新闻多看点 2023年11月，自民党曝出"黑金"丑闻，多个派阀给所属国会议员下达销售指标，要求他们出售政治 筹款派对券。如果超过销售指标，多出的资金将以"回扣"形式返还给议员。这部分 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio's distribution of 100,000 yen gift vouchers to members of his party during a dinner, raising questions about potential violations of political funding laws [1][3][4]. Group 1: Event Details - On March 3, Kishida hosted a dinner for 15 newly elected members of the House of Representatives, during which his office distributed 100,000 yen gift vouchers to attendees [1][3]. - Kishida claimed that the vouchers were intended as "souvenirs" and were not related to political activities, asserting that there were no legal issues involved [2][4]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The Japanese Political Funds Control Law prohibits personal donations related to political activities, including cash or valuable securities, which raises concerns about the legality of the gift vouchers [3][5]. - Critics argue that the distribution of such vouchers could be interpreted as a personal donation to politicians, potentially violating the law [5]. Group 3: Political Reactions - Opposition parties have criticized Kishida's actions, suggesting that they could undermine the government's functioning, especially given the reliance on minority party cooperation for passing budgets and important legislation [3]. - Prominent political figures have expressed doubts about Kishida's judgment and the appropriateness of using public funds in this manner, especially in light of rising living costs in Japan [5].