Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of establishing and practicing a correct view of performance within the party, highlighting the need for practical actions, focusing on key individuals, and identifying priority areas to strengthen accountability and deterrence [1][2][6] Group 1: Key Individuals - The focus of the educational initiative is on the "key minority," specifically county-level and above leadership, particularly the top leaders, to identify issues related to performance views through various methods [3] - The article points out that deviations in performance views among these key individuals can lead to widespread issues, including formalism and corruption, particularly at the grassroots level [3] Group 2: Priority Areas - The article identifies several critical areas of concern, including setting unrealistic high targets without considering local conditions, blindly following trends, creating barriers to national market integration, and inflating performance metrics [4] - It stresses the need for immediate rectification of prominent issues and the establishment of regulations that align with the correct view of performance [4] Group 3: Disciplinary Measures - The article outlines the disciplinary actions stipulated in the current regulations for party members whose performance views deviate from the new development philosophy, including warnings, removal from positions, or expulsion from the party depending on the severity of the deviation [5] - It advocates for stricter penalties for those involved in wasteful "image projects" or "performance projects" that do not yield genuine results [6]

新华社北京1月21日电 假数字撑不出真业绩。 校准政绩观，为民造福是本。领导干部想问题干事情要时时以群众满不满意、赞不赞成为出发点，不搞 虚浮冒进、哗众取宠那一套，分清"显绩"与"潜绩"，多做打基础、利长远、惠民生的实事。 校准政绩观，实干担当为先。官场不是"秀场"，业绩都是干出来的，真干才能真出业绩、出真业绩，用 实实在在的发展成果回应群众期盼。 从实际出发、为人民办事，大家就会看在眼里、念在心里。（新华社记者郭翔 丁非白） 中央有关部门19日通报的整治形式主义为基层减负典型问题，直指一些地方和部门的政绩观偏差。花费 高额费用"改分数"，实现在"百强县榜单"上榜进位；要求企业提供虚假佐证资料，甚至代企业编造数 据；层层加码下达指标，基层在上级压力下进行统计数据造假…… 真实的数据本应是发展的"晴雨表""对比镜"，不是瞒上欺下的数字游戏。注水掺假甚至"花钱买数据"， 加重了基层"内卷"和负担，助长榜单评价机构的牟利行为，贻误发展，贻害无穷。 "假数字"表象的背后，是一些领导干部错位政绩观作祟：企图用"涂脂抹粉"的数据来"秀政绩"、搞"花 架子"，换取个人所谓的"前程"。政绩不够数据凑，对这样的错误观念必须坚决 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to correct the short-sighted behavior of local governments that prioritize local interests over national economic integration, which hinders the construction of a unified national market [1][2]. Group 1: Issues in Local Governance - Some local governments create "policy depressions" by providing land and incentives to attract investment, while also establishing hidden barriers to protect local enterprises [1]. - There is a tendency to pursue high-tech projects without considering local capabilities, leading to redundant construction and intensified competition within industries [1]. - Short-sighted actions driven by performance pressure result in a focus on local benefits at the expense of broader economic principles, creating a vicious cycle where government subsidies distort the market [1]. Group 2: Correcting Performance Evaluation - To address the deviation in performance evaluation, it is essential to guide officials to avoid impulsive project selection and blind investments without considering risks [2]. - The current performance assessment system for officials faces challenges, such as the difficulty in setting "potential performance" indicators and implementing differentiated evaluations [2]. - There is a need to incorporate metrics like "elimination of market barriers" and "fairness in bidding" into local assessments to enhance accountability and address performance deviations [2]. Group 3: Promoting Sustainable Development - Officials are encouraged to enhance their understanding of economic development laws and to shift from competing for resources and policies to improving the business environment [3]. - There is a call for fostering a unique industrial ecosystem that benefits both local and national interests, contributing to overall economic growth [3].