Group 1 - The article discusses the concept of "superstition" and its multifaceted nature, highlighting that it is not merely a subject waiting to be conquered by science but is intertwined with various aspects of life [1] - It references Jiang Shaoyuan's work "Folklore and Superstition," which defines superstition as beliefs and practices that conflict with modern science, reflecting a historical perspective on the topic [2][5] - The article explores the public's reaction to the construction of Sun Yat-sen's mausoleum, where rumors about the need to capture souls of children led to widespread panic and the creation of protective charms [6][7] Group 2 - Jiang Shaoyuan's analysis includes the official responses to the rumors, indicating that the authorities' actions may have inadvertently fueled public fear rather than alleviating it [7][8] - The article contrasts the public perception of Sun Yat-sen with that of Lenin, suggesting that the lack of a "savior" figure in Chinese culture contributed to a different public response to revolutionary figures [16][20] - It emphasizes the cultural differences between Russian and Chinese traditions regarding the concept of a "savior," noting that Chinese culture tends to focus on self-reliance rather than reliance on a singular heroic figure [21][24]