本文基于准确的原话原词进行了仔细考究，推荐阅读。 2025年4月张小珺问 你不是技术型的CEO，就是你不像梁文锋那样，你担心手下的AI的高管忽悠你 吗？ 李想的回复是我觉得如果是科学，他可能忽悠我，但如果是工程，他忽悠不了我。对，所以幸好 AI不是科学，AI是工程。 在此次访谈后续与截至2026年2月10日，李想没有在公开场合细化解释为什么认为AI不是科学，而是 工程。据静静关闭弹射起步透露李想持此观点更早之前在内部说过。在同一场对话中李想认为自己很 擅长工程，给的锚点是汽车之家与增程的架构都没变过，是一开始就想好的。认为工程能力很多时候 是问结构性的问题，并提到自己比较喜欢物理。 2026年2月6日马斯克进行了2h49min，马斯克多次表达类似AI的本质不是理论探索而是工程落地和硬 件实现的意思。 马斯克明确认为xAI是几百名工程师而不是研究员，指出大多数时候(most of time)做的就是工程工作 而不是想出一个根本性的新算法。 明确说有点不同意(somewhat)C公司或B公司(原话说的就是C公司B公司)为了尽可能多地增加盈利收 入称自己是实验室，认为它们不是实验室，实验室是一种在大学里类似quas ...

回顾人类历史，科学逐渐演变为经济增长的主要驱动力，重塑了20世纪的经济结构和周期，直接影响着 宏观经济格局和微观经济模式。正如智能手机带来的划时代影响所展现的，科技创新不仅成为经济增长 的重要引擎，也从根本上改变了我们每个人的日常生活方式。然而，我们也必须认识到，人类正处于一 个充满前所未有、相互交织挑战的时代。科学在不断取得重大突破的同时，也积累了一定的系统性、结 构性和制度性风险。人工智能正对科技产生全面且加速的影响，从根本上重塑科学生态系统。人类正站 在选择未来科学发展方向的十字路口。 科学资源本质上是人类集体智慧的结晶。在科学真理面前，人人生而平等。每个人都应该能够获取、公 开使用和再利用科学知识，从而实现科学领域的公平正义。本次峰会的主要目标，就是推动形成开放科 学共识，使科学成为全人类共同的事业。开放科学旨在超越自然、人工智能、世代、国界、价值体系和 文明的界限，促进科学知识的自由流动和广泛共享，构建适应数字化、智能化时代的新型科学框架。 我们相信，从现在到2050年，人工智能发展的技术奇点将正式到来。现代科学的使命是确保这一进程可 以推动人类文明进步。科学的使命不仅在于解释世界，更在于推动文明迈 ...

活动现场，工作人员通过悬挂"信邪教愚昧无知，讲科学光荣无上"的宣传横幅，发放反邪教宣传手册， 向居民详细讲解邪教的本质、特征以及对家庭和社会的危害。同时，结合真实案例，引导居民提高警 惕，远离邪教，鼓励大家积极向身边亲友宣传反邪教知识，共同营造崇尚科学、反对邪教的良好社区氛 围。不少居民还主动与工作人员交流，分享自己对反邪教的看法，现场互动频繁，氛围热烈。 居民们纷纷表示，通过此次宣传活动，对邪教有了更清晰的认识，今后会更加坚定地相信科学，抵制邪 教侵蚀。 （来源：市场星报） 星报讯 为增强社区居民对邪教危害的认识，树立科学健康的生活观念，1月15日上午，合肥市包河区淝 河镇黄巷村联合镇平安法治办开展反邪教宣传活动。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The event celebrated the 80th anniversary of the Jiusan Society, featuring the launch of a series of books and a documentary aimed at promoting patriotism, democracy, and scientific spirit, while also serving as a platform for historical education and consensus building [1][2]. Group 1: Event Overview - The launch event took place on December 15, with a warm atmosphere marked by applause and the unveiling of new books and a documentary titled "Heart and River" [1][2]. - The series of books and the documentary were initiated to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the Jiusan Society, aiming to create a lively educational platform for the "Five Histories" [1]. Group 2: Contributions and Perspectives - The president of Xueyuan Publishing House highlighted the historical significance of the books, describing them as a systematic presentation of historical materials and a political textbook that helps readers understand the Jiusan Society's alignment with the Communist Party of China [2]. - The documentary director emphasized the importance of balancing historical accuracy with narrative expression, aiming to showcase the political stance of the Jiusan Society and its commitment to national development through technology [2]. Group 3: Future Directions - An expert representative discussed the roles of researchers in studying and passing on the society's history, advocating for innovative methods to engage younger members and ensure the history resonates deeply [3]. - The vice chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference stressed that the release of the books and documentary is just the beginning, urging for their effective use in promoting the society's development and integrating them with ongoing educational initiatives [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article commemorates the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War, highlighting the enduring spirit and historical significance of various educational institutions in China during wartime [1]. Group 1: Southwest Associated University - The Southwest Associated University, which existed for only eight years, produced eight "Two Bombs, One Satellite" contributors and two Nobel Prize winners, marking its legendary status in Chinese education history [3]. - The university's spirit is encapsulated in its motto "Resilience and Excellence," and its legacy is preserved through various cultural initiatives, including the establishment of a museum and themed performances [9][11]. - Students are inspired by the perseverance of their predecessors, who maintained optimism and a commitment to serving the country despite challenging circumstances [7]. Group 2: Nanjing University and the John Rabe Memorial - The John Rabe Memorial in Nanjing serves as a testament to the humanitarian efforts during the Nanjing Massacre, housing a list of 602 refugees saved by Rabe and his colleagues [12]. - The memorial has welcomed approximately 300,000 visitors and has utilized modern technology to share Rabe's story internationally, emphasizing the importance of peace [16]. Group 3: Chongqing University - Chongqing University features significant historical buildings, such as the "Stone House" which survived multiple bombings during the war, symbolizing resilience in the pursuit of knowledge [17]. - The university's cultural heritage is preserved through the renovated "Seven-Seven Anti-Japanese War Auditorium," which continues to serve as a cultural hub [24]. - The university's commitment to education during wartime is reflected in its ongoing initiatives to honor the sacrifices of past generations and inspire current students [22].

Group 1 - The article discusses the concept of "superstition" and its multifaceted nature, highlighting that it is not merely a subject waiting to be conquered by science but is intertwined with various aspects of life [1] - It references Jiang Shaoyuan's work "Folklore and Superstition," which defines superstition as beliefs and practices that conflict with modern science, reflecting a historical perspective on the topic [2][5] - The article explores the public's reaction to the construction of Sun Yat-sen's mausoleum, where rumors about the need to capture souls of children led to widespread panic and the creation of protective charms [6][7] Group 2 - Jiang Shaoyuan's analysis includes the official responses to the rumors, indicating that the authorities' actions may have inadvertently fueled public fear rather than alleviating it [7][8] - The article contrasts the public perception of Sun Yat-sen with that of Lenin, suggesting that the lack of a "savior" figure in Chinese culture contributed to a different public response to revolutionary figures [16][20] - It emphasizes the cultural differences between Russian and Chinese traditions regarding the concept of a "savior," noting that Chinese culture tends to focus on self-reliance rather than reliance on a singular heroic figure [21][24]

Core Viewpoint - The 2025 Inner Mongolia Science Popularization Explanation Competition for Youth showcased the creativity and knowledge of 98 middle and primary school students, emphasizing the importance of science education and engagement among the youth [3][9]. Group 1: Event Overview - The competition featured a theme of "Curiosity Ignites Dreams, Science Illuminates the Future" and was held in Ordos [3]. - Participants used various methods such as models, videos, and presentations to make scientific principles accessible and engaging [3][5]. Group 2: Participant Profiles - Contestants included experienced hosts, coding experts, and local ambassadors, highlighting diverse backgrounds and skills [5]. - Common motivations for participation included a desire to share scientific knowledge and inspire others [5][8]. Group 3: Educational Impact - The competition aimed to cultivate curiosity, imagination, and exploration among youth, contributing to the development of future scientists [8][9]. - The event is part of broader efforts by the Inner Mongolia Science and Technology Department to enhance science education and promote scientific literacy among young people [9]. Group 4: Related Activities - An accompanying "Science Night" event focused on environmental education, featuring interactive experiences at the Ordos Wildlife Park [8]. - Activities included immersive learning experiences designed to spark curiosity and enjoyment in science [8]. Group 5: Institutional Support - The competition is organized by various governmental and educational bodies, reflecting a commitment to science popularization and knowledge exchange [9]. - Ongoing initiatives aim to strengthen the science education framework and encourage collaboration between schools, universities, and research institutions [9].

Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit filed by 16 states against the Trump administration aims to block significant cuts to federal funding for scientific research and related programs that promote diversity in STEM fields [1] Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was filed in Manhattan federal court on May 28, involving states such as New York, California, Illinois, and New Jersey [1] - The attorneys general of these states argue that the Trump administration lacks the authority to limit research funding and to cancel congressionally authorized diversity programs provided by the National Science Foundation [1]