摩根大通研报警告MicroStrategy因持有大量比特币可能被MSCI指数剔除，面临最高88亿美元资金流出。报告引爆币圈愤怒，支持者发起抵制摩根大通 运动，指控其做空并号召"逼空"反击。阴谋论随之蔓延：有人称美国政府制造暴跌以低价抄底，更有人将此解读为摩根大通代表的"旧金融秩序"与特朗 普政府支持的"比特币新体系"之间的权力暗战。 一份来自摩根大通的研报引爆了币圈的愤怒情绪，将本就因比特币暴跌而焦躁不安的加密货币社区彻底点燃。这份研报如同一颗投入深水潭的炸弹，激 起的涟漪迅速演变为一场席卷币圈的"阴谋论"风暴，指控从华尔街恶意做空，到美国政府"制造崩盘"，甚至升级为一场关乎货币未来的权力暗战。 这家华尔街巨头——摩根大通关于MicroStrategy面临指数剔除风险的警告，意外成为各种阴谋论的导火索。摩根大通在研报中指出，MSCI正考虑将持 有大量比特币的公司从其指数中剔除，这可能导致MicroStrategy最高面临88亿美元的被动资金流出。 这份华尔街投行研报的风险提示，在 比特币跌破9.4万美元"生产成本" 、市场恐慌蔓延的背景下，被币圈解读为一次"蓄意攻击"。愤怒的投资者迅速将 矛头指向了报告的发布 ...

报道介绍，现年27岁的威尔金斯是一名乡村音乐歌手、播客主持人、作家和保守派政治评论员。据报道，她和帕特尔于2023年初开始约会。二人的恋情已经 公开了一段时间，威尔金斯曾于今年2月出席了帕特尔在白宫的宣誓就职仪式，两人都在网上分享过合照。 不过，《国会山报》称，威尔金斯一直是各种"阴谋论"的对象，包括她被指可能是以色列间谍。威尔金斯已对这些指控提起诉讼。据《新闻周刊》报道，帕 特尔也曾发表声明抨击这些指控"毫无根据"。 《国会山报》评论称，FBI局长的配偶有专人保护并不罕见，但据报道，负责保护威尔金斯的人员系来自田纳西州的特警队成员。该媒体称，特警队很少会 承担保护任务，因为这些训练有素的人员通常会随时待命，应对恐怖袭击、枪战、突袭和人质劫持等高风险情况。此外，报道提到，获得安保保护的FBI局 长配偶通常会和局长本人住在一起，但目前威尔金斯和帕塔尔主要住所不在同一城市。 【环球网报道 记者 索炎琦】据美国《国会山报》、《新闻周刊》等媒体报道，美国联邦调查局（FBI）17日证实，FBI局长帕特尔的女友威尔金斯已得到该 部门安保保护。此前，威尔金斯因深陷"阴谋论"而收到死亡威胁。 报道援引FBI发言人的一份声明称 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. Department of Defense announced a major reshuffle of the Pentagon press corps, forming a new 60-member "new media" team, which includes various right-wing and far-right media representatives [1] - Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell stated that 60 media workers signed agreements to comply with new media regulations, joining 26 previously signed journalists to form the "new generation press corps" [1] - Parnell emphasized that the new press corps would be more effective and objective than mainstream media, which he criticized for being filled with "radical activists" masquerading as journalists [1] Group 2 - Last month, the Pentagon issued a 21-page set of new interview regulations, restricting journalists' access to most areas of the Pentagon without an escort and requiring them to sign confidentiality agreements [2] - The Pentagon Press Association strongly opposed these new regulations, leading to at least 30 media journalists collectively leaving the Pentagon on the 15th [2] - Notable media organizations that refused to sign the agreement included major outlets like the Associated Press, Reuters, The Wall Street Journal, and The Atlantic, as well as right-leaning media such as Fox News and The Washington Times [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rise of conspiracy theories within right-wing networks, particularly focusing on the absurd claims surrounding Brigitte Macron, the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron, and how these narratives have gained traction in mainstream discourse [12][20][52]. Group 1: The Conspiracy Theory Phenomenon - The conspiracy theory claiming "Brigitte is a man" has been propelled into the spotlight by Candace Owens, a right-wing influencer, who has leveraged her platform to promote this narrative, resulting in significant public engagement [7][10][20]. - Owens' podcast series "Becoming Brigitte" has garnered millions of views, transforming a fringe conspiracy into a widely discussed topic, showcasing the power of social media in amplifying such narratives [10][31]. - The origins of the conspiracy date back to 2021, with earlier claims made by French far-right media, indicating a long-standing interest in undermining the Macron family [14][19]. Group 2: The Role of Social Media and Influencers - Owens has effectively utilized her relatable persona and cultural commentary to draw in audiences, making extreme narratives more palatable and accessible to the general public [30][32]. - The article highlights how right-wing influencers like Owens and Charlie Kirk have successfully bridged the gap between fringe conspiracy theories and mainstream acceptance, reshaping public discourse [32][34]. - The spread of these theories is not limited to the U.S.; similar patterns are observed in other countries, indicating a global right-wing movement that utilizes social media to propagate its agenda [11][45]. Group 3: The Impact on Society - The normalization of conspiracy theories has led to a significant shift in public perception, where absurd claims are increasingly treated as legitimate news, reflecting a broader societal trend towards skepticism of established narratives [20][52]. - The article emphasizes that these conspiracies have real-world implications, as they can incite violence and unrest, evidenced by recent events in various countries [51]. - The blending of conspiracy theories with everyday discussions has made them a default mode of understanding complex societal issues, raising concerns about the erosion of critical thinking [52].

Group 1 - The article discusses the significant impact of Trump and Kennedy on the U.S. public health system, suggesting it is on the brink of collapse [2][34] - Trump's recent announcement linking acetaminophen use during pregnancy to autism has raised concerns, despite a lack of scientific evidence supporting this claim [3][8][34] - The article highlights the historical context of conspiracy theories surrounding autism and acetaminophen, noting that previous studies have not found a correlation [5][8][12] Group 2 - The rise of conspiracy theories in the U.S. has been linked to a growing distrust in modern medicine, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic [31][34] - The article emphasizes the importance of societal trust in the medical system, stating that without it, even advanced medical technologies cannot be effective [34] - It suggests that the current political climate, driven by figures like Trump and Kennedy, is eroding the foundational trust in the healthcare system [34][32]

Core Points - The upcoming local elections in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, are significant for the political landscape, especially given the recent deaths of seven candidates from the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party [1][2] - The AfD party had seen a substantial increase in votes during the 2022 state elections, solidifying its political position in the region [1] - The circumstances surrounding the candidates' deaths, including five due to illness or age, one reported as "natural causes," and one confirmed suicide, have raised concerns and led to speculation about their impact on the elections [1][2] Group 1 - The local elections in North Rhine-Westphalia are crucial for Germany's political structure and social atmosphere [1] - The AfD party's political status was further strengthened after the 2022 state elections [1] - The deaths of the candidates have led to police investigations, with no evidence of foul play found [1] Group 2 - The vice-chairman of the AfD expressed shock at the statistical improbability of losing so many candidates in such a short time before the elections [2] - Social media has seen a rise in conspiracy theories linking the candidates' deaths to the elections, prompting calls for thorough investigations [2] - Criticism has emerged regarding the AfD's potential exploitation of the situation for electoral gain [2]

Group 1 - The article discusses the concept of "superstition" and its multifaceted nature, highlighting that it is not merely a subject waiting to be conquered by science but is intertwined with various aspects of life [1] - It references Jiang Shaoyuan's work "Folklore and Superstition," which defines superstition as beliefs and practices that conflict with modern science, reflecting a historical perspective on the topic [2][5] - The article explores the public's reaction to the construction of Sun Yat-sen's mausoleum, where rumors about the need to capture souls of children led to widespread panic and the creation of protective charms [6][7] Group 2 - Jiang Shaoyuan's analysis includes the official responses to the rumors, indicating that the authorities' actions may have inadvertently fueled public fear rather than alleviating it [7][8] - The article contrasts the public perception of Sun Yat-sen with that of Lenin, suggesting that the lack of a "savior" figure in Chinese culture contributed to a different public response to revolutionary figures [16][20] - It emphasizes the cultural differences between Russian and Chinese traditions regarding the concept of a "savior," noting that Chinese culture tends to focus on self-reliance rather than reliance on a singular heroic figure [21][24]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the political dynamics surrounding Donald Trump and Elon Musk, particularly focusing on Musk's recent actions that have put Trump in a difficult position regarding the Epstein case and the expectations of his MAGA supporters [3][11][12]. Group 1: Political Dynamics - Musk's recent tweets have reignited discussions about Trump's connections to Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting that Trump has not fulfilled his promises regarding the Epstein documents [4][21]. - MAGA supporters are expressing their discontent, with some even burning their MAGA hats as a form of protest against Trump [6][10]. - The article highlights a division among Trump's allies, with prominent figures calling for Trump to release the Epstein documents, indicating a potential fracture within the Republican base [8][10]. Group 2: Impact of Social Media - Musk's platform, X (formerly Twitter), has become a breeding ground for conspiracy theories and misinformation, amplifying the scrutiny on Trump [40][42]. - The article notes that Musk's ability to leverage social media to target disillusioned MAGA supporters could reshape the political landscape, potentially creating a new faction [45]. - The use of memes and AI-generated content on X has further fueled the narrative against Trump, showcasing the power of social media in modern political discourse [42][44]. Group 3: Conspiracy Theories - The article discusses the role of conspiracy theories in shaping the beliefs of Trump's supporters, who have long been fed narratives about elite corruption and cover-ups [24][26]. - Trump's previous promises to expose the Epstein documents have contributed to the expectations of his supporters, making his current stance appear hypocritical [21][31]. - The ongoing discourse around Epstein serves as a critical point of contention, revealing the fragility of the narratives that have sustained Trump's base [30][31].

Group 1 - The Trump administration has been criticized for attempting to divert attention from the Epstein case by releasing controversial documents related to Martin Luther King Jr. and the Hillary Clinton email investigation [1][4][5] - A significant majority of Americans, approximately 89%, support the release of documents related to the Epstein case, with 92% believing these documents may contain damaging information about prominent political figures [7][8] - There is a growing bipartisan call among Republican lawmakers for the release of all documents related to Epstein, indicating a potential shift in political dynamics as the midterm elections approach [9] Group 2 - The release of over 230,000 pages of documents regarding Martin Luther King Jr. has faced strong opposition from his family and civil rights organizations, who argue it could distort his legacy and be used for political purposes [3][5] - The Justice Department's recent disclosure of the Hillary Clinton email investigation has raised questions about the handling of sensitive information by the FBI, contrasting sharply with the agency's aggressive investigation into Trump [4][8] - The Epstein case is seen as a significant threat to Trump's political support, with many of his loyal supporters expressing dissatisfaction over his failure to fulfill promises regarding transparency [6][8]

Core Viewpoint - The relationship between Elon Musk and Donald Trump has dramatically shifted from close allies to fierce adversaries, raising speculation about a potential hidden collaboration behind their public disputes [2][4]. Group 1: Relationship Dynamics - Musk and Trump have engaged in a series of public attacks and threats, yet no substantial actions have been taken that would harm each other's core interests [4][5]. - Musk has threatened to withdraw support for NASA, which could impact the U.S. space program, while Trump has suggested investigating Musk's companies, but neither threat has materialized into real consequences [5][6]. Group 2: Legislative Context - The ongoing debate over the "Big Beautiful Bill" has intensified the conflict, with Musk threatening to form a new political party if the bill passes, yet these threats have not led to any concrete actions [5][8]. - The bill proposes significant cuts to welfare programs, amounting to approximately $1.5 trillion over the next decade, which includes nearly $1 trillion in medical assistance and $500 billion in food stamps [8][9]. Group 3: Economic Implications - Trump's administration is facing severe challenges, including a lack of financial support from the Federal Reserve, leading to a need to leverage internal resources to secure economic benefits [8][9]. - The collaboration between Musk and Trump may be aimed at accessing a larger economic pie, estimated at $200-300 billion annually from the technology sector, rather than solely focusing on welfare cuts [9][11]. Group 4: Future Outlook - With the passage of the "Big Beautiful Bill," Musk has retreated from the spotlight to focus on his business ventures, suggesting a strategic pause in their public feud while waiting for the next opportunity to re-engage [11].