Group 1 - The "digital eraser" phenomenon refers to the loss, alteration, or oversimplification of original cultural information during the digitization process, which poses a threat to the integrity and authenticity of culture [1][2][5] - The digitalization of culture should drive innovation, but if it becomes mere "formal replication," it can lead to a loss of foundational creativity [2][12] - The phenomenon can result in information distortion and loss, where cultural data may be modified or fabricated, leading to a misrepresentation of cultural elements [5][8][10] Group 2 - The use of AI in cultural restoration can lead to aesthetic homogenization, where unique historical values and meanings of artifacts are lost in pursuit of visual perfection [7][11] - Cultural homogenization occurs as digital platforms favor popular content, marginalizing local and diverse cultural expressions [11][12] - The digitalization process may neglect traditional methods of cultural transmission, leading to a disconnection from cultural roots and a decline in recognition among younger generations [12][13] Group 3 - The underlying logic of the "digital eraser" phenomenon includes a focus on efficiency over cultural depth, resulting in a superficial treatment of cultural resources [16][18] - Technical limitations and a lack of standardized practices can lead to data loss and inaccuracies in cultural representation [19][20] - Profit-driven motives may lead companies to prioritize easily digitizable cultural projects, neglecting those with significant cultural value [21][23] Group 4 - Algorithmic biases and data monopolies can suppress cultural diversity by favoring mainstream content, effectively erasing minority cultural expressions [24][26] - The need for a collaborative mechanism that integrates technology, humanities, and institutional frameworks is essential to ensure that cultural digitization respects cultural values while meeting technical standards [29][31]