推动传播观念更新 （来源：衢州日报） 转自：衢州日报 一是制度创新逻辑，以数据驱动、算法优化为核心的智能治理体系突破传统科层制层级限制，可以促进 政府管理、社会调节与群众自治良性互动。二是能力提升逻辑，以数据为资源、以算法为生产力，实现 从"群众跑腿"到"数据跑腿"、从"被动响应"到"主动感知"的转变，有助于决策更科学、执行更精准、服 务更高效。三是价值导向逻辑，运用智能化手段有利于精准识别民意，实现民情汇聚、政策回应、服务 落地的闭环治理，更贴近民生、回应民意。 摘编自《人民日报》 数智技术重塑思维方式 数智时代的传播革命，不仅体现为技术的更迭，更引发思维方式的重塑。数智技术在人们日常生活中的 渗入程度不断加深，人类思维方式由线性思维转向互联互动的网络思维。与之相适应，信息传播的逻辑 从"我说你听"变为"共建共享"，内容生产的观念也从"输出触达"转为"共创共鸣"。这使传播活动不再局 限于信息的传递，而成为人们对于意义与认知的互相激发，推动国际传播观念从"单向输出"转向"互动 融入"，从而为国际传播的创新发展打开新思路。摘编自《光明日报》 市场为文旅产业转型升级与人才培养 体制变革搭建起有机互动的桥梁 在劳动 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of digital empowerment in governance, highlighting the integration of emerging technologies like big data and artificial intelligence to enhance government efficiency and modernize governance capabilities [1][4]. Group 1: Digital Empowerment in Governance - Digital empowerment in governance is a modern governance model based on data, supported by technology, and oriented towards collaboration [1]. - The Chinese government aims to implement an "AI+" initiative to integrate artificial intelligence with various sectors, including industry, culture, and social governance [1][2]. - Digital governance is expected to accelerate the construction of a digital government, enhancing governance effectiveness through data-driven approaches [1][2]. Group 2: Logic of Digital Empowerment - There are three main logics of digital empowerment in governance: 1. Institutional innovation logic, which promotes interaction between government management, social regulation, and community autonomy [2]. 2. Capability enhancement logic, which shifts from "people running errands" to "data running errands," leading to more scientific decision-making and efficient service delivery [2]. 3. Value-oriented logic, which utilizes intelligent methods to accurately identify public sentiment and create a closed-loop governance system that responds to public needs [2]. Group 3: Challenges and Issues - The article notes the emergence of "digital formalism," where the application of technology does not align with governance logic, leading to inefficiencies and a focus on form over substance [3]. - Issues such as insufficient platform operation, excessive emphasis on process management, and over-reliance on quantitative assessments can obscure real societal needs [3]. - The result of these challenges includes weakened governance effectiveness, increased governance costs, and diminished public trust in policy execution [3]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - The Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission and the National Development and Reform Commission have issued guidelines to prevent "digital formalism" and ensure that digital empowerment serves social governance effectively [4]. - It is crucial to align digital governance with public service improvement and to avoid a purely technology-driven approach [4]. - Strengthening institutional norms and enhancing the digital literacy of governance bodies are essential for effective digital governance [5]. Group 5: Technological Innovation and Governance - The integration of new technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence, and blockchain is vital for transforming governance methods and enhancing collaboration [6]. - Establishing a smart closed-loop system for data collection, analysis, decision-making, and feedback is necessary for effective governance [6]. - Emphasizing algorithm governance and data security management will help ensure privacy protection and ethical oversight in digital governance [6].