为精准赋能粤港澳大湾区智能制造产业发展，广州互联网法院深入广汽、里工实业、致景科技、南方电 网、亿航智能、文远知行等大湾区智能制造领军企业开展深度调研，于建院7周年之际，重磅推出《粤 港澳大湾区智能制造产业司法观察报告》。 AI决策 "黑箱"特性带来责任划分问题 传统 "过错责任"原则适用面临挑战 报告提出，随着新一代信息技术与制造业的深度融合，产业的法律形态正在发生变化。 调研中发现四 大典型法律问题与现象。 以数据、算法为代表的新型生产要素引出了新权利的界定问题。这类无形权益的价值主要在动态流转与 应用中实现，其权利归属与利益分配方式与传统物权或知识产权法的静态保护维度存在差异，司法实践 中需要探索适应其动态特性的新规则。 人工智能决策的 "黑箱"特性带来了新风险的责任划分问题。当智能系统造成损害时，在设计者、开发 者与使用者等多环节间的技术溯源与法律归责，使得传统 "过错责任"原则的适用面临挑战，并对司法 机关的技术事实查明能力提出了要求。 智能制造催生的平台用工、共享制造等新业态，在一定程度上模糊了传统法律关系的边界，引发发展与 规制方面的讨论。司法裁判需要为新模式下的风险承担与权益保障提供指引。 产 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case involving Taobao and Tmall against Wang Mouming and his companies marks a significant legal precedent in regulating the use of "搬家软件" (migration software) for data scraping in the e-commerce sector, clarifying the boundaries of data rights and competition in the digital economy [1][4][6]. Group 1: Case Background - Wang Mouming's companies developed paid "搬家软件" that allowed users to bypass Taobao and Tmall's verification mechanisms to scrape large amounts of data, creating a complete chain of data theft and parasitic business operations [2][3]. - The software enabled users to set up "无货源店铺" (no-stock stores) on other e-commerce platforms, leveraging data from Taobao and Tmall without authorization [2][3]. Group 2: Court Findings - The court determined that Taobao and Tmall's product data is not a public resource but a legally protected asset developed through significant investment in technology and operations [4][5]. - The court ruled that the actions of Wang Mouming's companies constituted unfair competition by circumventing platform protections and infringing on the platforms' data control rights [5][6]. Group 3: Legal Implications - The ruling emphasized that publicly available data does not equate to public or shared data, and any improper acquisition of such data should be regulated [6][7]. - The court ordered Wang Mouming and his companies to pay 5 million yuan in damages to Taobao and Tmall, highlighting the legal consequences of data theft in the e-commerce industry [5].