（来源：千龙网） 1月24日下午，北京市政协十四届四次会议举行界别联组会，委员们就"坚持城市内涵式发展，提升首都超大城市治理效能"主题提出意见建议。会上，21位 委员围绕城市更新、生态治理、韧性城市建设等热点议题建言献策。 1月24日下午，北京市政协十四届四次会议举行界别联组会。新京报记者 李木易 摄 谋划具有引领性的城市复兴旗舰项目 "当前北京更新项目较多聚焦基础改善，但缺乏具有国际影响力的高品质旗舰项目。"如何打造富有活力的创新城市？北京市政协常委，北京市建筑设计研究 院总建筑师、总规划师吴晨建议，系统谋划一批具有引领性和示范性的城市复兴旗舰项目。 他说，旗舰项目不同于一般的改造项目，它呈现能级高、产业链长、带动面广、特殊性强等特征，是城市复兴的"标杆样板"。通过区域完整性谋划和关键节 点示范，吸引多元资本参与城市更新，为城市内涵式发展提供重要支撑作用。 在他看来，北京作为超大型城市，单一项目难以覆盖广域发展需求。因此以区为单元打造旗舰项目，选取最能撬动区域潜力的关键领域，每个区明确1-2个 重点方向，有助于资源聚焦、政策精准和协同推进，引导差异化布局，最终形成国际-城市-地区三个层级的旗舰项目体系。 强 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of artificial intelligence and its related industries in enhancing the quality and scale of the digital economy, positioning them as new engines for economic growth. It highlights the need for institutional guarantees to support private enterprises in their innovative endeavors within the digital economy [3]. Group 1: Challenges Faced by Private Enterprises in Digital Transformation - The digital economy, driven by digital technologies and data, creates mismatches with traditional economic factors such as land, capital, and labor, necessitating adjustments and regulations [4]. - There is a conflict between unclear data ownership and the innovation investments made by private enterprises, which contribute over 70% of China's technological innovations. The ambiguity surrounding data ownership and usage rights discourages investment and innovation [4]. - The outdated regulatory methods lead to compliance anxiety among private enterprises, as they struggle to understand dynamic regulatory requirements, which may inhibit their willingness to innovate [4]. - The misalignment of competition rules in the digital economy creates challenges for fair development among private enterprises, particularly with the dominance of major platform companies and the potential for algorithmic discrimination against smaller firms [5]. Group 2: Enhancing Legal Frameworks to Empower Private Enterprises - To address the aforementioned challenges, a shift from traditional legal frameworks to those that accommodate digital transformation is necessary, focusing on three key transitions [6]. - The legal framework should evolve from a focus on physical space to one that considers digital space, establishing clear rules for data rights, security, and circulation to empower private enterprises [7]. - The regulatory approach should transition from merely overseeing compliance to enabling growth by reducing institutional transaction costs for private enterprises, thus enhancing their operational efficiency [7]. - Legal requirements should be integrated into the innovation processes of private enterprises to provide preemptive compliance support, transforming punitive measures into safeguards that encourage innovation [7]. Group 3: Institutional Innovations for Private Enterprises - Current institutional innovations should focus on three areas to meet the practical needs of private enterprises [8]. - Clear definitions of data ownership are essential, allowing private enterprises to gain rights to data processing and usage, thereby enabling them to monetize data effectively [8]. - Algorithm regulation should be transparent and allow for error correction, providing private enterprises with clarity on compliance and reducing the fear of punitive actions for non-malicious algorithmic deviations [8]. - Facilitating cross-border data flow is crucial for private enterprises engaged in international business, requiring clear pathways and simplified processes for data export [8]. Group 4: Building a Supportive Digital Environment for Private Enterprises - Creating a conducive digital environment for private enterprises involves establishing a legal ecosystem that encourages participation, adapts rules, and allows for continuous iteration [9]. - A stable and fair business environment, characterized by clear data ownership, transparent regulation, and equitable competition, is vital for unleashing the innovative potential of private enterprises in the digital economy [9].