日本加速为致命武器出口松绑，中方：坚决抵制日本"新型军国主义"妄动 日本在允许致命武器出口的道路上又迈进一步。2月25日，日本执政党自民党的一个专门小组批准一项 提案，推动政府放宽限制防卫装备转让的相关规定。此前一天，日方还首次公布在与中国台湾邻近的西 南诸岛部署导弹部队的时间。中国外交部发言人毛宁25日在例行记者会上对日本有关动向表示，国际社 会对此应高度警惕，携手捍卫二战胜利成果和战后国际秩序，坚决抵制日本"新型军国主义"妄动。 加速为武器出口松绑 据 《日本时报》25日报道，日本自民党安全保障调查会当天批准的提案预计于下月初提交给政府，有 可能在今年春季生效。据日本共同社报道，该提案原则上允许该国出口战机、护卫舰等武器，对于 向"被判定目前正在发生战斗的国家"出口也留有余地——是否允许出口将由日本国家安全保障会议审 查。 现行的《防卫装备转移三原则》运用指针将允许出口的防卫装备品限定在"救援、运输、警戒、监视、 扫雷"这5类。共同社报道称，日本首相高市早苗在本月20日的施政方针演说中表达了放宽防卫装备品出 口规则的意愿，强调将加速探讨修改出口仅限上述非战斗目的5类的规则。高市宣称，这将有助于提升 同盟国 ...

【环球时报报道 记者 郭媛丹】日本在允许致命武器出口的道路上又迈进一步。2月25日，日本执政党自 民党的一个专门小组批准一项提案，推动政府放宽限制防卫装备转让的相关规定。此前一天，日方还首 次公布在与中国台湾邻近的西南诸岛部署导弹部队的时间。中国外交部发言人毛宁25日在例行记者会上 对日本有关动向表示，国际社会对此应高度警惕，携手捍卫二战胜利成果和战后国际秩序，坚决抵制日 本"新型军国主义"妄动。 加速为武器出口松绑 即将部署导弹部队的这座小岛距离台湾约110公里，位于日本最西端。2016年已在该岛设立陆上自卫队 驻地，设置了沿岸监视队。陆自还计划在2026年度新设对空电子战部队。 张军社对《环球时报》记者表示，日本03式中程防空导弹于2003年起列装陆上自卫队。日本依托琉球群 岛一线，构建多层次防空反导体系，主要意在战时配合美国军事介入台海冲突，拦截、对抗中方海空力 量与弹道导弹，同时掩护美军在冲绳的前沿基地，在宫古海峡至台岛附近海空域形成防空反导屏障。不 过，若日本利用西南诸岛的导弹部队攻击中方海空兵力，将构成侵略行为，"中方必然实施坚决反击， 其部署在相关岛屿的军事设施均为中方合理打击目标。" 中方表示 ...

毛宁表示，由于侵略历史，日本的军事安全动向一直备受亚洲邻国和国际社会关注。近年来日本大幅调 整安保政策，日方官员还公开鼓噪"拥核"，谋求修改"无核三原则"，取消武器出口限制，再次暴露了日 本右翼势力突破战后国际秩序和国内法的约束、谋求"再军事化"的野心。 据新华社北京2月25日电（记者 邵艺博 朱超） 外交部发言人毛宁2月25日就日本自民党有关松绑武器出 口的最新动向答问时表示，中方对此表示严重关切。国际社会应携手捍卫二战胜利成果和战后国际秩 序，坚决抵制日本"新型军国主义"妄动。 当日例行记者会上，有记者问：日本执政党自民党通过了呼吁政府放宽防卫装备出口的提案，松绑此前 被禁止的致命武器出口。外交部对此有何评论？ ...

毛宁表示，由于侵略历史，日本的军事安全动向一直备受亚洲邻国和国际社会关注。近年来日本大幅调 整安保政策，日方官员还公开鼓噪"拥核"，谋求修改"无核三原则"，取消武器出口限制，再次暴露了日 本右翼势力突破战后国际秩序和国内法的约束、谋求"再军事化"的野心。 "国际社会对此应高度警惕，携手捍卫二战胜利成果和战后国际秩序，坚决抵制日本'新型军国主义'妄 动。"毛宁说。 新华社北京2月25日电（记者邵艺博、朱超）外交部发言人毛宁2月25日就日本自民党有关松绑武器出口 的最新动向答问时表示，中方对此表示严重关切。国际社会应携手捍卫二战胜利成果和战后国际秩序， 坚决抵制日本"新型军国主义"妄动。 当日例行记者会上，有记者问：日本执政党自民党通过了呼吁政府放宽防卫装备出口的提案，松绑此前 被禁止的致命武器出口。外交部对此有何评论？ ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent election results in Japan indicate a significant victory for the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), allowing Prime Minister Sanna Takashi to continue in power and potentially leading Japan into a more nationalistic and right-leaning political phase [1][3]. Group 1: Election Results and Implications - The LDP secured 316 seats in the House of Representatives, surpassing two-thirds of the total 465 seats, marking the first time since World War II that a single party has achieved such a majority [1]. - This victory suggests a return to a political landscape characterized by a dominant party, enabling the LDP to pass legislation independently [1]. Group 2: Factors Behind LDP's Victory - Three main factors contributed to the LDP's unexpected electoral success: 1. A return of conservative voters to the LDP, driven by economic hardships and rising nationalist sentiments among younger demographics [3]. 2. High-profile campaigning by Sanna Takashi, including emotional appeals and extensive social media engagement, resulting in nearly 1 billion views of her campaign videos [3]. 3. External support from figures like Donald Trump, which, despite criticism for undermining electoral integrity, influenced some voters [3]. Group 3: Potential Policy Changes - With a secure majority, the LDP is expected to implement previously discussed nationalist and right-wing policies, including anti-espionage laws and military expansion, leading to concerns about a shift towards "new militarism" in Japan [6]. - There are fears that the LDP's approach may exacerbate regional tensions, as the party stirs nationalist sentiments within Japan [6]. Group 4: Academic Perspectives - Scholars express concern that the LDP's strategy of appealing to voters through populist and nationalist policies may ultimately lead to economic repercussions and political instability [7]. - Some academics remain hopeful for a counterbalance within Japan, emphasizing the presence of voices advocating for peace and rational discourse amidst rising nationalism [7].

Group 1 - Japan's "new militarism" is no longer just a dangerous trend but a real threat that requires vigilance from all peace-loving international forces [1][2] - Japan's recent claims of "economic coercion" from China are seen as an attempt to deflect attention from its own militaristic actions and refusal to reflect on its mistakes [1][3] - China's export controls on dual-use items to Japan are framed as necessary measures to maintain international peace and security, countering Japan's military expansion [1][2] Group 2 - Japan's leadership has made provocative statements regarding Taiwan, openly threatening China and interfering in its internal affairs, which violates international law [2] - Reports indicate Japan is accelerating its militarization, including potential revisions to its security documents and discussions around nuclear armament, which challenge international non-proliferation efforts [2][3] - The rising military budget in Japan, projected to reach approximately 11 trillion yen for the fiscal year 2025, raises concerns about its impact on regional peace and domestic welfare [3]

Group 1 - Japan's recent accusations against China regarding export controls on dual-use items are seen as an attempt to deflect attention from its own militaristic tendencies and failure to reflect on its actions [1][2] - China's export control measures are framed as a legitimate exercise of sovereignty aimed at maintaining international peace and security, countering Japan's militarization efforts [1][2] - The international community is increasingly concerned about Japan's shift towards militarism, particularly its attempts to revise its nuclear policies and military strategies [2][3] Group 2 - Japan's military expansion is viewed as a real threat to regional stability, with significant increases in defense spending projected to reach approximately 11 trillion yen for the fiscal year 2025 [3] - The narrative of Japan as a "victim" in the context of economic coercion is criticized as a diversion from its own aggressive military posture [3] - There is a growing urgency to address Japan's militaristic ambitions to preserve regional peace, with calls for accountability from both the international community and Japanese citizens [2][3]

Group 1 - Japan's "new militarism" is no longer just a dangerous trend but a real threat that requires vigilance from all peace-loving international justice forces [1][2] - Japan's recent claims of "economic coercion" from China are seen as an attempt to deflect attention from its own militaristic ambitions and violations of international norms [1][3] - The Chinese government's measures to impose export controls on dual-use items to Japan are framed as necessary actions to maintain peace and security, reflecting its commitment to international responsibilities [1][2] Group 2 - Japan's leadership has made provocative statements regarding Taiwan, openly threatening China and interfering in its internal affairs, which violates international law and principles [2] - Reports indicate that Japan is accelerating its militarization process, including plans to revise its security documents and discussions around nuclear armament, which challenges the international non-proliferation regime [2][3] - The rising defense budget in Japan, projected to reach approximately 11 trillion yen for the fiscal year 2025, places a financial burden on its citizens and raises concerns about regional stability [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that Japan's "new militarism" is not just a dangerous trend but a real threat that requires vigilance from all peace-loving international forces [1][2] - Japan's recent statements regarding Taiwan and military threats against China violate international law and basic principles of international relations, reflecting a serious challenge to post-war international order [2] - Japan's push to revise its security documents and its attempts to modify the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" indicate a rapid militarization process and a potential nuclear ambition, which has drawn strong international condemnation [2][3] Group 2 - China's measures to impose export controls on dual-use items to Japan are framed as necessary actions to safeguard peace and security, countering Japan's accusations of "economic coercion" [1][2] - Japan's military expansion, including a defense budget reaching approximately 11 trillion yen for the fiscal year 2025, poses a threat to regional peace and stability, burdening its citizens financially [3] - The contradiction in Japan's call for dialogue while simultaneously provoking China on core issues undermines its national credibility and reveals its insincere stance [3]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's intention to modify the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" poses a significant challenge to global nuclear non-proliferation and could lead to increased nuclear proliferation risks, undermining world peace [1][3]. Group 1: Japan's Nuclear Policy Shift - Japan's historical narrative has often portrayed itself as a "nuclear victim," neglecting its past as a "nuclear aggressor" during World War II, where it pursued atomic bomb research in competition with the US and UK [1]. - Recent statements from Japanese officials about potentially revising the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and considering nuclear submarines indicate a shift in Japan's security strategy, moving the nuclear option into public political discourse [1][2]. Group 2: Strategic Objectives Behind the Shift - The push for nuclear policy discussions aims to weaken post-war constraints and accumulate political capital for Japan's ambition to become a "military power" [2]. - By gauging public and international reactions to nuclear armament discussions, Japanese politicians are testing the boundaries of policy changes and preparing for future revisions [2]. - Japan seeks to enhance its autonomous deterrence capabilities and redefine its role within the US-Japan alliance, viewing nuclear armament as a means to reduce dependency on allies [2]. - The intention to strengthen military capabilities in the Taiwan Strait and East China Sea reflects Japan's strategy to exert pressure on neighboring countries and improve its position in regional power dynamics [2]. Group 3: Historical Context and Responsibilities - The "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" were established as a national policy reflecting Japan's remorse for wartime actions and its commitment to peace, rooted in the painful memories of Hiroshima and Nagasaki [3]. - Modifying these principles would undermine Japan's historical responsibilities and commitments to its neighbors, posing a serious threat to regional stability and peace [3]. - The international community must remain vigilant against Japan's potential return to nuclear armament and the resurgence of militarism, which could jeopardize the welfare of the region [3].