Core Insights - The article discusses the contrasting development models between China and Europe, highlighting China's efficient infrastructure and urban planning compared to Europe's outdated systems [3][4][6]. Infrastructure and Transportation - The efficiency of China's high-speed rail system is emphasized, with a travel time of 8 hours and 10 minutes for a distance of 2439 kilometers, showcasing punctuality and modern facilities [1][3]. - In contrast, the reliability of Germany's rail system is criticized, suggesting it has deteriorated significantly [3]. Urban Development - The article highlights Shanghai as a model of advanced urban planning, with a focus on citizen needs and technological integration, contrasting it with the fragmented development in European cities [4]. - The systematic approach in China, characterized by clear goals and execution, is noted as lacking in the European Union, where ambitious plans often remain unfulfilled [4]. Perception and Media Influence - There is a recognition of a cognitive bias in Europe regarding China, shaped by media portrayals rather than direct experience [5]. - The article points out the discrepancy in perceptions of economic success between the EU and China, illustrating a double standard in how achievements are viewed [5]. Historical Context and Learning - The historical relationship between Europe and China is referenced, suggesting that Europe needs to adopt a more open and learning-oriented mindset rather than a prescriptive one [6]. - The article argues for a reevaluation of policies towards China, criticizing the narrative of "dependency" and advocating for a more balanced approach to international relations [6]. Future Outlook - The desire for peaceful development and free trade among European nations is expressed, emphasizing the potential for a multipolar world order that benefits all [7].