【责任编辑：杨鑫宇】 景区须主动公示官方快速服务的购买渠道，对非授权的"快通"套餐及时预警，从源头切断乱象传播 链条。 游客更需擦亮双眼，在购买服务时核实商家资质、细究套餐规则。一旦发现上当受骗，及时留存交 易记录等证据，依法维护自身权益。 旅游市场的健康生态，体现在监管划定的行为边界里，在景区坚守的诚信中，还在游客自觉的维权 意识里。唯有多方形成合力，才能杜绝这类文字游戏，让"快通"服务回归"便捷出游"的本意，让游客在 清朗的市场环境中安心出游。 花上万元订购景区"快通套餐"，却跟着导游满园奔跑；支付"优速通""尊享卡"费用，热门项目仍要 苦等1小时……近期，多地景区被曝出"快通"消费陷阱。这类行为本质上是商家利用信息差设计的文字 游戏，不仅让游客权益受损，更侵蚀着旅游市场的诚信根基。 景区"快通"变"快跑"，折射出旅游市场治理的多重考验。不良商家是这类乱象的始作俑者。他们 用"快通""VIP尊享"等与官方服务高度混淆的词汇包装普通服务，已涉嫌虚假宣传。第三方平台存在审 核漏洞，对入驻商家审核不严，为虚假宣传提供了生存空间。此外，部分"黑导游"通过非法手段获取官 方"优速通"产品并加价倒卖牟利，已触碰法律红 ...

游客更需擦亮双眼，在购买服务时核实商家资质、细究套餐规则。一旦发现上当受骗，及时留存交 易记录等证据，依法维护自身权益。 花上万元订购景区"快通套餐"，却跟着导游满园奔跑；支付"优速通""尊享卡"费用，热门项目仍要 苦等1小时……近期，多地景区被曝出"快通"消费陷阱。这类行为本质上是商家利用信息差设计的文字 游戏，不仅让游客权益受损，更侵蚀着旅游市场的诚信根基。 旅游市场的健康生态，体现在监管划定的行为边界里，在景区坚守的诚信中，还在游客自觉的维权 意识里。唯有多方形成合力，才能杜绝这类文字游戏，让"快通"服务回归"便捷出游"的本意，让游客在 清朗的市场环境中安心出游。(本文来源：经济日报 作者：李 翱) 景区"快通"变"快跑"，折射出旅游市场治理的多重考验。不良商家是这类乱象的始作俑者。他们 用"快通""VIP尊享"等与官方服务高度混淆的词汇包装普通服务，已涉嫌虚假宣传。第三方平台存在审 核漏洞，对入驻商家审核不严，为虚假宣传提供了生存空间。此外，部分"黑导游"通过非法手段获取官 方"优速通"产品并加价倒卖牟利，已触碰法律红线。 破解这类乱象，需要相关部门、景区和游客合力共治。监管部门要持续规范旅游业广告用 ...

Core Insights - The Nanjing Jiangning District's disciplinary committee responded quickly to complaints regarding a travel agency's "8-day panoramic tour of Sichuan" that involved inducement to consume, ensuring effective compensation for affected tourists [1] - The incident prompted the Jiangning District's disciplinary committee to enhance the regulation of the tourism market, aiming to promote healthy development in the tourism economy [1] Group 1: Incident Response - The disciplinary committee intervened immediately, coordinating with the district's cultural and tourism bureau and the local street office to address the issue and facilitate compensation [1] - The resolution of the problem is seen as a starting point for further actions, with the committee emphasizing the need for comprehensive oversight and stricter approval processes for travel agencies [1] Group 2: Ongoing Regulatory Efforts - The Jiangning District's disciplinary committee has been actively working to address issues related to inducement to consume and forced shopping, conducting special rectification efforts in collaboration with relevant departments [1] - There is a systematic inspection of entertainment venues with prepaid and stored value characteristics, such as gyms, to mitigate potential risks [1] - The district is also proactively assessing consumer demand and operational risks for emerging local cultural and tourism projects, ensuring a transparent and beneficial consumption environment [1] Group 3: Governance Structure - The street office and relevant departments have increased daily inspections and enforcement efforts, creating a positive cycle of "investigating one case, warning a region, and governing an area" [2] - A new governance framework combining government regulation, industry self-discipline, and social supervision is being established to enhance tourism service quality and create a safe and comfortable consumption environment [2]

Group 1 - The article highlights the absurdity of "customer reward tours" organized by insurance companies, where tourists are coerced into shopping at overpriced stores, revealing a gray chain of low-cost tourism [1][2] - Insurance company agents disguise low-cost tours as customer benefits, collaborating with unscrupulous travel agencies to exploit tourists, leading to a loss of consumer rights [1][2] - Tourists face intimidation from guides, who threaten that failure to purchase will result in being unable to return home, while insurance company representatives side with the guides against complaints [1][2] Group 2 - The article discusses the ambiguity of responsibility among insurance companies, where agents claim no affiliation with the company after incidents occur, creating a cycle of consumer rights violations [2] - It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive regulatory approach to address forced shopping issues in the tourism market, including establishing a dynamic review mechanism for travel agency qualifications [2][3] - The article calls for a shift from reactive consumer protection to proactive governance, as insurance companies transition from "risk guardians" to "trap designers," undermining industry credibility [2][3]

Group 1 - The article highlights the absurdity of "customer reward tours" organized by insurance companies, where tourists are coerced into shopping at overpriced locations, revealing a gray market in low-cost tourism [1][2] - Insurance company agents disguise low-cost tours as customer benefits, collaborating with unscrupulous travel agencies to exploit tourists, leading to a loss of consumer rights [1][2] - Tourists face intimidation from guides, who threaten that failure to purchase will result in being unable to return home, indicating a systemic issue within the tourism industry [1][2] Group 2 - The article discusses the ambiguity of responsibility among insurance companies, where agents claim no affiliation with the company after incidents occur, creating a cycle of consumer rights violations [2] - It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework to address forced shopping issues in the tourism market, suggesting that multiple departments are initiating special rectification efforts [2] - The article calls for a shift from reactive consumer protection to proactive governance, urging the establishment of a dynamic review mechanism for travel agency qualifications and stricter accountability for insurance companies [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Beijing Municipal Bureau of Culture and Tourism has imposed a 30-day suspension on a travel agency's electronic itinerary system registration rights due to high complaint volumes, aiming to address long-standing issues in the tourism market and protect consumer rights [1][2] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The suspension of the electronic itinerary registration rights directly impacts the travel agency's ability to issue legal itineraries, effectively disrupting its business operations [1] - This regulatory measure serves as a "technical disconnection," targeting the core of the travel agency's violations while encouraging the company to confront and rectify its issues [1] Group 2: Consumer Protection - From a consumer perspective, the suspension acts as a preventive measure, creating a "firewall" that protects tourists from potential violations such as unauthorized itinerary changes or forced shopping [1] - By preventing non-compliant agencies from issuing legal itineraries, consumers are encouraged to choose compliant companies, thereby reducing their risk exposure [1] Group 3: Long-term Solutions - The article emphasizes that penalties are merely a means to an end, and a comprehensive solution requires establishing a closed-loop mechanism of "punishment - rectification - credit" [2] - Dynamic regulation of non-compliant companies and integrating penalty records into the tourism market credit system are essential to ensure that violations lead to broader consequences [2] - The case serves as a model for other regions to shift the tourism market focus from "price competition" to "quality competition," ultimately enhancing consumer experiences [2]

Core Viewpoint - The tourism market is experiencing a surge in consumer activity during the "May Day" holiday, but issues such as hotel cancellations and price hikes are prevalent, highlighting a need for integrity among businesses, strict enforcement by the government, and proactive consumer rights protection [1][2]. Group 1: Market Issues - There has been a significant increase in complaints regarding hotel cancellations and price hikes, with some hotels canceling reservations made months in advance, citing various excuses, leading to inflated prices upon rebooking [1]. - The behavior of hotels appears to be driven by a desire for profit maximization in a supply-demand imbalance, which can damage long-term industry reputation and customer loyalty [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Measures - Regulatory authorities across the country are intensifying oversight and imposing strict penalties on businesses that engage in unilateral cancellations or price increases after bookings are confirmed [2]. - Recommendations include establishing price increase limits based on regular pricing to prevent excessive price hikes during holidays, and implementing a "blacklist" system for dishonest businesses [2]. Group 3: Consumer Rights - Consumers are encouraged to utilize legal means to protect their rights, including retaining evidence, filing complaints with platforms or regulatory bodies, and pursuing legal action if necessary [2]. - Platforms are urged to actively resolve disputes and support honest businesses while penalizing those that violate agreements, fostering a competitive and trustworthy market environment [2].