记者了解到，重庆公安创新打造"千手护蕾·未成年人管护"应用场景，通过监测预警、智能分析等手 段，降低未成年人受侵害风险和违法犯罪风险，推动未成年人保护和预防违法犯罪从"被动应对"向"主 动预防"转变。 "长期开展未成年人犯罪预防工作，我深感'前端预防'比'事后补救'更重要。"重庆市潼南区公安局民警 吴冬琴介绍，该局成立了专注未成年人保护和犯罪预防工作的"冬琴护苗"工作室，通过开展"沉浸式"体 验教育，警醒了不少边缘未成年人。 据介绍，重庆市璧山区公安局与璧山区教委共同打造的"树洞口袋"工作室，目前已覆盖全区中小学，惠 及6.5万余名学生。该工作室自2023年初成立以来，已成功为上千名学生解决校园、家庭、心理等隐患 类问题。此外，重庆市公安局万盛经济技术开发区分局创立的"真义大课堂"，聚焦未成年人犯罪预防工 作，通过联合市公安局青少年犯罪研究所专家并整合其他相关资源，构建五大课程体系和"中心课堂 +分课堂"模式，运行3年来已帮助超200名学生重回正轨。 （来源：工人日报） 本报讯（记者李国 实习生唐佳琦）记者日前从重庆市公安局了解到，近年来，重庆市完善全天候全链 条护"未"体系，将未成年人保护工作置于突出位置， ...

责任编辑： 王靖 围绕未成年人健康成长、提升养老服务、激发文化创新创造活力等人民群众关切的话题，代表们畅所欲 言。杨华代表建议，应着力加强未成年人犯罪预防，将网络素养教育全面纳入学校课程体系，进一步夯 实家庭监护责任，积极构建政府、企业、学校、家庭、社会协同共治的预防新格局。王子龙代表建议， 进一步加大居家适老化改造补贴力度，鼓励利用社区闲置资源改造嵌入式养老设施，加强养老机构管理 与护理人员的专业化培训，让老年人真正实现老有所养、老有所依、老有所乐、老有所安。曹永彬代表 建议，要大力培育数字文化新业态，促进河南文化与科技深度融合，用数字的"心跳"激活沉睡的历史文 化资源，以文化数字化助力文旅强省建设。（记者 金京艺） 1月27日，出席省十四届人大四次会议的各代表团召开分组会议，审议省人大常委会工作报告、省高级 人民法院工作报告、省人民检察院工作报告，审查"十五五"规划纲要草案、计划报告和草案、预算报告 和草案。 在各代表团审议现场，代表们谈感受、讲体会，畅所欲言。大家一致认为，过去一年，省人大常委会围 绕省委部署，聚焦民之所盼，关注改革之要，准确把握新时代新征程使命任务，交出了一份担当作为、 守正创新的履职 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the urgent need for a tiered intervention system for juvenile offenders in response to the increasing trends of juvenile crime, particularly its younger and gang-related aspects [2][3] Group 1: Current Challenges - There is a growing public demand for establishing a tiered intervention system for juvenile offenders due to the evident trends of younger and gang-related crimes [2] - Practical challenges include poor mechanism connectivity, insufficient departmental collaboration, and inadequate effectiveness in the current intervention efforts [2] Group 2: Proposed Solutions - The representative suggests that the judicial system should enhance its supervisory role and expedite the establishment of a tiered intervention and correctional supervision mechanism for juvenile offenders [2] - A refined approach is recommended, moving away from a "one-size-fits-all" strategy to a more detailed and precise intervention system that includes general prevention, special prevention for at-risk youth, and recidivism prevention [3] Group 3: Implementation Framework - The proposed mechanism should integrate a three-tier system that includes general prevention for all juveniles, targeted interventions for those exhibiting problematic behaviors, and measures to prevent reoffending [3] - The framework should utilize scientific assessments and dynamic grading to match interventions, creating a closed-loop system of assessment, intervention, feedback, and adjustment for personalized correction [3] Group 4: Collaborative Efforts - The representative highlights the importance of multi-party collaboration, suggesting that the judicial system work with police, education, civil affairs, youth organizations, and social services to create a cooperative network for information sharing and functional integration [3] - Emphasis is placed on ensuring data security to protect the privacy of minors while implementing these collaborative efforts [3]

Core Perspective - The article discusses the psychological issues faced by juvenile delinquents, particularly focusing on the root causes of violent behavior stemming from childhood trauma and lack of emotional regulation [1][2]. Group 1: Psychological Insights - A significant portion of juvenile cases involves violence triggered by minor provocations, highlighting a lack of rational emotional processing among these youths [1]. - Many children, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, develop aggressive behaviors as a defense mechanism against past traumas and social neglect [1][2]. - The emotional responses of adolescents differ from adults, often leading to misinterpretations of social cues and increased aggression [1][2]. Group 2: Judicial and Educational Reforms - The judicial system is shifting from a punitive approach to one focused on rehabilitation and emotional education for juvenile offenders [2][3]. - Programs are being implemented that include psychological counseling, community service, and family education to address the underlying issues of delinquency [2][3]. - The integration of social workers and psychologists into the judicial process is crucial for understanding the social and psychological backgrounds of juvenile offenders [2][3]. Group 3: Community and Family Support - A comprehensive prevention strategy is necessary, involving collaboration between the judicial system, educational institutions, families, and society [4]. - Education should incorporate social-emotional learning to equip children with skills to manage emotions and resolve conflicts non-violently [4]. - Families need support to improve parenting practices, emphasizing emotional connection and positive communication [4]. Group 4: Long-term Vision - The goal is to create a supportive environment that fosters understanding and resilience in children, helping them to process social interactions positively [4]. - Continuous efforts in investigation, dialogue, and professional intervention can significantly alter the life trajectories of at-risk youth [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the urgent need for a tiered intervention system for juvenile offenders in response to the increasing trends of juvenile crime, particularly among younger individuals and in groups [2][3] Group 1: Current Challenges - There is a growing public demand for establishing a tiered intervention system for juvenile offenders due to the rising incidence of juvenile crime [2] - Existing intervention efforts face challenges such as poor mechanism connectivity, insufficient departmental collaboration, and inadequate effectiveness [2] Group 2: Proposed Solutions - The representative suggests that the judicial system should enhance its supervisory role and expedite the establishment of a tiered intervention and correction supervision mechanism for juvenile offenders [2] - A refined approach to intervention is recommended, moving away from a "one-size-fits-all" strategy to a more precise, tiered system that includes general prevention, special prevention for at-risk youth, and recidivism prevention [3] - The proposed mechanism should integrate a collaborative network involving various stakeholders such as law enforcement, education, and social organizations to ensure effective information sharing and functional coordination [3] Group 3: Implementation and Future Directions - The article highlights the successful establishment of a tiered intervention supervision platform by the Xinxiang City Procuratorate, which utilizes systematic design and digital support for risk assessment and dynamic supervision [2] - Continuous collaboration between the representative and the procuratorial authorities is emphasized to further advance juvenile protection efforts and ensure the healthy development of youth [3]

Core Viewpoint - The handling of the bullying incident at Cangwu Campus should focus on the individuals involved, emphasizing the need for rebuilding safety and psychological support for victims, as well as personalized rehabilitation plans for perpetrators, rather than solely relying on strict law enforcement [1][4]. Summary by Sections Incident Overview - The Cangwu County Education Bureau has taken significant action against the principal, vice-principal, and homeroom teacher of Shiqiao Middle School, suspending them for negligence. Nine students involved in the bullying have been sent to a specialized school for corrective education, reflecting the seriousness of the incident and responding to public calls for strict measures against school bullying [2]. Legislative Changes - The revised Public Security Administration Punishment Law now includes provisions for handling school bullying, allowing police to impose administrative penalties for acts of violence, insult, or intimidation among students. Schools failing to report or address severe bullying incidents will face mandatory corrections and potential disciplinary actions against responsible personnel [3]. Educational and Corrective Measures - The corrective education for minors includes various measures such as admonition, public apology, compensation for damages, and supervision by social organizations. The law specifies that serious offenders may be sent to specialized schools, indicating a more severe approach for repeated or serious misconduct [3][4]. Focus on Individual Needs - The approach to handling bullying cases should prioritize the needs of both victims and perpetrators, ensuring that interventions are tailored to address the root causes of the issues. This includes providing psychological support for victims and rehabilitation for offenders, rather than merely punitive measures [4].

Core Viewpoint - The release of the fourth batch of typical cases by the Supreme People's Procuratorate and other organizations aims to enhance family education guidance for minors involved in criminal cases, emphasizing the importance of family education in preventing juvenile delinquency [1][4]. Group 1: Issues Identified - A common issue among families involved in these cases is the "lack of guardianship" and "improper discipline," which leads to minors losing direction in a complex social environment [2]. - The absence of effective family education is identified as a critical factor contributing to juvenile delinquency, necessitating a focus on activating family education's preventive role [2]. Group 2: Practical Guidance - The typical cases provide concrete examples and operational guidelines for parents to improve family education, bridging the gap between awareness and practice [2]. - Innovative measures such as mandatory family education guidance orders and tiered intervention models are highlighted as replicable experiences that can enhance the quality and effectiveness of family education [2]. Group 3: Long-term Mechanisms - To transform the leading effect of typical cases into widespread effectiveness, a long-term support network involving collaboration among judicial bodies, women's federations, and other organizations is essential [3]. - Establishing a comprehensive and continuous support system throughout the legal process is crucial to ensure the effectiveness of family education guidance [3]. Group 4: Societal Responsibility - The initiative aims to awaken societal awareness of the legal responsibilities of family education, emphasizing that "raising children according to the law" is a national concern rather than merely a family matter [3]. - The typical cases serve as valuable practical examples to strengthen family education, ultimately aiming to prevent juvenile delinquency at its source [4].