Core Viewpoint - The handling of the bullying incident at Cangwu Campus should focus on the individuals involved, emphasizing the need for rebuilding safety and psychological support for victims, as well as personalized rehabilitation plans for perpetrators, rather than solely relying on strict law enforcement [1][4]. Summary by Sections Incident Overview - The Cangwu County Education Bureau has taken significant action against the principal, vice-principal, and homeroom teacher of Shiqiao Middle School, suspending them for negligence. Nine students involved in the bullying have been sent to a specialized school for corrective education, reflecting the seriousness of the incident and responding to public calls for strict measures against school bullying [2]. Legislative Changes - The revised Public Security Administration Punishment Law now includes provisions for handling school bullying, allowing police to impose administrative penalties for acts of violence, insult, or intimidation among students. Schools failing to report or address severe bullying incidents will face mandatory corrections and potential disciplinary actions against responsible personnel [3]. Educational and Corrective Measures - The corrective education for minors includes various measures such as admonition, public apology, compensation for damages, and supervision by social organizations. The law specifies that serious offenders may be sent to specialized schools, indicating a more severe approach for repeated or serious misconduct [3][4]. Focus on Individual Needs - The approach to handling bullying cases should prioritize the needs of both victims and perpetrators, ensuring that interventions are tailored to address the root causes of the issues. This includes providing psychological support for victims and rehabilitation for offenders, rather than merely punitive measures [4].

Core Viewpoint - The release of the fourth batch of typical cases by the Supreme People's Procuratorate and other organizations aims to enhance family education guidance for minors involved in criminal cases, emphasizing the importance of family education in preventing juvenile delinquency [1][4]. Group 1: Issues Identified - A common issue among families involved in these cases is the "lack of guardianship" and "improper discipline," which leads to minors losing direction in a complex social environment [2]. - The absence of effective family education is identified as a critical factor contributing to juvenile delinquency, necessitating a focus on activating family education's preventive role [2]. Group 2: Practical Guidance - The typical cases provide concrete examples and operational guidelines for parents to improve family education, bridging the gap between awareness and practice [2]. - Innovative measures such as mandatory family education guidance orders and tiered intervention models are highlighted as replicable experiences that can enhance the quality and effectiveness of family education [2]. Group 3: Long-term Mechanisms - To transform the leading effect of typical cases into widespread effectiveness, a long-term support network involving collaboration among judicial bodies, women's federations, and other organizations is essential [3]. - Establishing a comprehensive and continuous support system throughout the legal process is crucial to ensure the effectiveness of family education guidance [3]. Group 4: Societal Responsibility - The initiative aims to awaken societal awareness of the legal responsibilities of family education, emphasizing that "raising children according to the law" is a national concern rather than merely a family matter [3]. - The typical cases serve as valuable practical examples to strengthen family education, ultimately aiming to prevent juvenile delinquency at its source [4].