如今，暑期托管资源更加丰富，为家长带娃提供了更多选择。也要看到，托管并非暑假的唯一解。 提供更多社会资源。开放更多社会教育场地，规范研学旅行活动，让家长和孩子有地可去，为悠长假期 提供更多选择。 带娃不只是家事，解决带娃难题，家校社要共同努力。 《 人民日报 》（ 2025年08月10日 05 版） (责编：白宇、卫嘉) 托管不能代替自主成长，不妨多点留白，让孩子充分探索、体验生活。托管不能代替广阔天地，社会大 课堂有助于开阔眼界。托管更不能代替陪伴，假期是家庭教育的重要时段，要多陪陪孩子，共享亲子时 光。 而对于一些家长而言，这意味着要付出更多时间精力和育儿智慧。理想的暑假，呼唤更多保障。 让带娃更有时间。有些地方出台落实带薪年休假制度的政策，有的用人单位结合实际采取弹性上下班、 居家办公等方式，有助于家长更好平衡家庭与工作。 加强家庭教育指导。引导家长和孩子合理规划假期生活，处理好电子产品应用等问题，避免不会带娃、 带不好娃。 ...

张智全 当然，扭转家庭监护缺失或失能的状态绝非易事，典型案例的引领效应要真正转化为普遍效能，还需要 长效机制的兜底保障。司法机关应强化与妇联、关工委等部门的深度协作，打破信息壁垒，整合专业力 量，建立起贯穿诉讼全程（侦查、起诉、审判）并有效延伸至判后帮教、社区矫正阶段的一体化、常态 化支持网络。只有形成环环相扣、持续发力的工作闭环，才能确保家庭教育指导的成效得以巩固和深 化，防止未成年人再次失足。 7月28日，最高人民检察院联合国务院妇女儿童工作委员会办公室、中华全国妇女联合会、中国关心下 一代工作委员会，发布了第四批在办理涉未成年人案件中全面开展家庭教育指导工作的典型案例。此举 旨在深化涉案未成年人家庭教育指导实践，推动未成年人犯罪预防与治理工作向纵深发展。 让每一个典型案例成为万千家庭的镜鉴，是预防未成年人犯罪的题中之义。典型案例示范引领的最终落 脚点，在于唤醒全社会对家庭教育法定责任的深刻共识与自觉行动。毕竟，"依法带娃"不再只是"家 事"，而是关乎民族未来的"国事"。最高检等部门联合发布典型案例，正是以国家法治之力为这份沉甸 甸的责任托底，为迷途的孩子点亮归航的灯塔，值得充分肯定。 近年来，未成年人犯 ...

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of protecting minors' rights and preventing juvenile crime, highlighting that it is a societal responsibility that requires collective effort [1] - The establishment of the juvenile trial work studio in Longyou County aims to enhance judicial functions and collaborate with educational institutions to provide psychological guidance and legal education for minors [1][2] Group 2 - A case involving a student named Xiaoxue reveals the psychological impact of parental conflicts on minors, leading to a decline in academic performance [2][3] - The court's intervention in Xiaoxue's family dispute resulted in a successful mediation, where the father promised to change his behavior and the mother withdrew the divorce petition [4][5] Group 3 - The Longyou Court has implemented various educational initiatives, such as the "Dragon Law Good Parents" class, to improve family dynamics and prevent negative impacts on children during critical academic periods [6][7] - The court has issued over 120 family education guidance orders and organized multiple public classes to enhance parental skills in managing family conflicts [6] Group 4 - The article discusses the need for specialized handling of juvenile cases, with judges forming teams to address new challenges and develop solutions for protecting minors' rights [7][8] - A specific case illustrates how the court facilitated an agreement between parents regarding child custody, emphasizing the importance of respecting children's opinions in such matters [8] Group 5 - The article highlights the rise in cases involving minors engaged in illegal activities, prompting the court to collaborate with law enforcement to address the root causes and prevent future occurrences [9][10] - The Longyou Court has successfully implemented preventive measures, resulting in a significant decrease in such cases over the past year [10] Group 6 - The article describes initiatives aimed at educating left-behind children in rural areas, including legal knowledge sessions during summer camps [10][11] - The court's outreach efforts include home visits and support for families in need, demonstrating a commitment to the welfare of minors [11][12] Group 7 - The collaboration between the judiciary and educational authorities is emphasized as a means to enhance the protection of minors, with joint efforts to address safety concerns in schools [14][15] - The article concludes with a call for continued cooperation among various stakeholders to ensure comprehensive protection for minors [14][17]

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the complexities of custody disputes involving parents with criminal backgrounds and the importance of assessing guardianship capabilities for the welfare of minors [1][2][3]. Group 1: Case Background - The minor, Wu Xiaosuo, has been raised by his father, Wu Mou, since his parents' divorce in 2013, but has faced issues including violence and poor education [2]. - Wu Mou has a criminal record and has been imprisoned, while the mother, Tong Mou, has also faced legal issues but claims to have improved her situation [2][3]. - The court's decision to change custody to the mother was contested by the father, leading to an appeal [2]. Group 2: Guardianship Assessment - The Beijing Third Intermediate People's Court utilized a professional social work agency to evaluate Tong Mou's guardianship capabilities over a period of one to two months [4]. - The assessment included multiple visits and interviews with Wu Xiaosuo, Tong Mou, and relevant parties, resulting in a comprehensive report on Tong Mou's ability to provide a suitable environment for her child [4]. Group 3: Legal Framework and Procedures - The evaluation of guardianship capabilities is guided by the Minor Protection Law, which mandates local governments to engage social organizations and professionals in the assessment process [5]. - The assessment criteria include the guardian's willingness, living conditions, educational capabilities, and ability to handle family relationships [5]. Group 4: Social Support and Follow-up - Despite the positive assessment, the court mandated additional support for Tong Mou to enhance her understanding of family education responsibilities [6]. - A family education guidance order was issued, requiring Tong Mou to submit a detailed nurturing plan for Wu Xiaosuo, which she complied with [7]. - The court also implemented a social observation system to monitor the child's welfare and educational progress, involving professional psychological support [8].

Core Viewpoint - The Jinshui District People's Procuratorate in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, has established a comprehensive juvenile justice system that focuses on rehabilitation and support for juvenile offenders and victims, aiming to provide them with opportunities for a better future [2][3][4]. Group 1: Juvenile Offender Rehabilitation - The Jinshui Procuratorate has implemented a "one-stop" case assistance center and a precise rehabilitation mechanism for juvenile offenders, which has helped over 218 juvenile offenders, with 17 gaining university admission and 12 recognized as outstanding volunteers [4][5]. - The center utilizes social workers to assess the backgrounds of juvenile offenders, tailoring rehabilitation programs to their specific needs, which has shown positive outcomes in reducing recidivism [5][10]. - The core of the rehabilitation approach is to enhance the self-management and growth capabilities of juvenile offenders, addressing both their family environment and personal behavior patterns [5][11]. Group 2: Support for Juvenile Victims - The "one-stop" assistance center also focuses on providing psychological support and legal aid to juvenile victims, minimizing the risk of secondary trauma during legal proceedings [8][9]. - The center has successfully implemented various support measures, including psychological counseling and family education programs, to help victims recover from trauma and reintegrate into society [9][10]. - Since 2022, the center has assisted 15 juvenile victims, distributing 100,000 yuan in aid and providing psychological counseling for 260 sessions [9][10]. Group 3: Family Education and Involvement - The Jinshui Procuratorate emphasizes the importance of addressing family issues that contribute to juvenile delinquency, offering educational programs for parents and guardians to improve their parenting skills [10][11]. - A new family education assessment tool is being developed to categorize families based on their needs, ensuring tailored support for each case [11]. - The initiative aims to create a systematic approach to family education, integrating various social resources to enhance the effectiveness of rehabilitation efforts for juvenile offenders [10][11].