Group 1 - The core issue is Europe's diminishing role in global diplomacy, particularly in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, where Europe has been sidelined in peace negotiations [4][9][10] - Since the onset of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Europe has provided over €187 billion in aid to Ukraine, which is comparable to Greece's entire GDP, highlighting the financial burden on European nations [6][6] - The absence of Europe in key negotiations, such as the recent talks between the US and Russia, underscores a significant shift in global power dynamics, with Europe feeling increasingly marginalized [4][9][10] Group 2 - The article discusses the historical context of Europe's 500-year dominance, which is now perceived to be ending, as emerging powers reshape global order [11][12][18] - European leaders are increasingly aware of their reliance on the US and the need to engage with China, as evidenced by upcoming high-level visits to China from various European leaders [30][33] - The tension between economic interests in China and security dependence on the US creates a dilemma for Europe, complicating its foreign policy and strategic autonomy [35][39][40] Group 3 - The article highlights the internal divisions within the EU, where different member states have varying priorities and strategies regarding foreign relations, making unified action difficult [42][47] - The phrase "if you are not at the table, you are on the menu" reflects Europe's current predicament, as it struggles to assert its influence in global affairs [47] - The future of Europe remains uncertain, as it grapples with whether to reclaim its position at the negotiating table or accept a secondary role in global politics [48]