欧洲战略自主

Search documents
欧洲难入局深层原因:除女性执政外,这个因素更值得关注
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-24 09:46
更别提欧洲自个儿还不齐心。赫尔辛基会晤后,德国总理默克尔在柏林喊着要"欧洲自主",可波兰等东欧国家死抱着美国大腿,根本 不买账。法国总统马克龙2018年11月在巴黎还提过"欧洲战略自主",甚至想搞"欧洲军队",结果呢?大家嘴上说好,实际没啥动静。专 家分析,欧盟内部27个国家各有小九九,压根拧不成一股绳。就像一盘散沙,风一吹就散架,咋跟美俄抗衡? 那为啥欧洲会这么"没牌面"呢?说白了,这跟美国对欧洲的"遥控"脱不了干系。从二战结束那会儿,美国就通过马歇尔计划给欧洲"输 血",帮着重建家园,可这钱不是白给的,背后藏着大算盘。美国在欧洲驻军、搞宣传,慢慢把欧洲变成了自己的"小弟"。用咱老百姓 的话讲,美国就是"大哥",欧洲就是"跟班",大哥说啥,咱得听着。这么多年下来,欧洲早就习惯了听指挥,哪还有啥独立性可言? 再看看能源这块,欧洲更是被美国拿捏得死死的。北溪二号管道,本来是德国和俄罗斯合作的能源大项目,能让欧洲天然气供应更稳 定。可特朗普在赫尔辛基会晤后直接开喷,说德国靠俄罗斯就是"自找麻烦"。到了2019年,美国直接甩出制裁法案,项目被迫停摆, 德国只能干生气,啥办法都没有。这不就是明摆着,美国不让你吃饱,你 ...
泽连斯基突访布鲁塞尔,与欧盟协调立场
第一财经· 2025-08-18 01:21
总台记者 顾鑫 :外界认为,欧洲多位领导人宣布将随同泽连斯基前往美国,是为避免欧洲国家和乌 克兰在美俄和谈中被进一步边缘化。值得注意的是,在泽连斯基与特朗普开启新一轮直接谈判的背景 下, 欧盟与乌克兰急于协调立场,确保自身利益不会被排除在外 。布鲁塞尔方面担心,若缺席关键 对话,欧洲在战争前景和安全架构重塑上的话语权将进一步削弱。冯德莱恩的表态凸显了欧盟试图以 制度性承诺稳住乌克兰,防止其在俄美博弈中处于孤立无援的境地。这一系列表态说明,随着战事与 外交博弈进入关键阶段, 欧洲方面正努力在维护团结与凸显自身战略自主之间寻找平衡 。 2025.08. 18 本文字数:814,阅读时长大约1.5分钟 据央视新闻,当地时间17日,乌克兰总统泽连斯基突然到访布鲁塞尔,与欧盟和欧洲国家领导人协 调对美谈判立场。 总台记者 顾鑫 :我所在的位置是比利时首都布鲁塞尔的欧盟委员会所在地,我们可以看到尽管当地 时间8月17日是休息日,但当地警方在这区域明显增加部署了警力。特别是通往欧委会大楼的多条道 路被封闭。因为欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩和来访的乌克兰总统泽连斯基就在这个大楼举行会谈,协调 对美谈判的立场。 总台记者 顾鑫 :在 ...
给乌克兰吃下“定心丸”,欧洲为何急于参与?
第一财经· 2025-08-18 01:21
2025.08. 18 本文字数:2041,阅读时长大约3分钟 据央视新闻,美国总统特朗普和乌克兰总统泽连斯基将于当地时间18日在美国首都华盛顿举行会 晤。17日,泽连斯基赴布鲁塞尔与欧盟协调立场,欧洲多位领导人表示要随同赴美参与会谈。 泽连斯基与特朗普此次会面要谈什么?各方有何表态?欧洲为何如此积极?目前俄乌战事如何? 欧盟及欧洲领导人与泽连斯基同赴美 记者 当地时间8月17日晚获悉,乌克兰总统泽连斯基已动身飞往美国,准备于当地时间8月18日访问 白宫,与美国总统特朗普会晤。欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩及法国总统马克龙、德国总理默茨、英国首 相斯塔默、意大利总理梅洛尼也将于同一天赴美。 赴美前,乌克兰总统泽连斯基17日到访布鲁塞尔,与欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩会见,双方举行了新 闻发布会。 泽连斯基在发布会上表示,在与特朗普会晤前与欧盟伙伴国的交流非常有益,将继续协调共同立场以 支持乌克兰的独立和主权。泽连斯基称, 领土问题只能由领导人层面讨论 。 乌克兰将加入欧盟视为 安全保障的一部分 。他还表示,并不知道特朗普和普京到底谈了什么。 欧洲给乌克兰吃下"定心丸" "乌克兰始终可以信赖欧洲" 冯德莱恩17日在新闻发布会 ...
与特朗普会谈前 泽连斯基突访布鲁塞尔与欧盟协调立场
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-08-17 23:57
欧盟与乌克兰急于协调立场,确保自身利益不会被排除在外。 当地时间17日,乌克兰总统泽连斯基突然到访布鲁塞尔,与欧盟和欧洲国家领导人协调对美谈判立场。 总台记者 顾鑫:我所在的位置是比利时首都布鲁塞尔的欧盟委员会所在地,我们可以看到尽管当地时 间8月17日是休息日,但当地警方在这区域明显增加部署了警力。特别是通往欧委会大楼的多条道路被 封闭。因为欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩和来访的乌克兰总统泽连斯基就在这个大楼举行会谈,协调对美谈 判的立场。 总台记者 顾鑫:在会议后双方举行了大约15分钟的新闻发布会。欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩强调了欧盟 在俄乌冲突中的几项核心立场:欢迎乌克兰加入欧盟,此举可被视为一种安全保障;欧盟不会允许乌克 兰的国际边境线遭到侵犯;关于乌克兰主权与领土的问题应由乌克兰自主决定。同时,欧盟成员国将继 续加强对俄制裁。冯德莱恩特别指出,在冲突解决过程中,乌克兰始终可以依靠欧盟的支持。 总台记者 顾鑫:乌克兰总统泽连斯基表示,领土问题必须由俄乌两国领导人直接谈判解决,乌克兰绝 不会放弃任何领土,而停火依然是启动和谈的必要前提。 总台记者 顾鑫:外界认为,欧洲多位领导人宣布将随同泽连斯基前往美国,是为避免欧 ...
缺席俄美峰会 欧洲恐被动接受谈判结果
Yang Shi Xin Wen Ke Hu Duan· 2025-08-15 18:11
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the significant diplomatic efforts by European countries regarding the upcoming meeting between Presidents Putin and Trump, indicating Europe's concern over its interests being overlooked [1][2] - European leaders, including those from Germany, France, and the UK, held a video conference with Trump to emphasize the necessity of safeguarding European and Ukrainian security interests, insisting that any agreements should start with a ceasefire [2] - The absence of European leaders from the Trump-Putin meeting reflects Europe's awkward position on the Ukraine issue, where it is unable to directly participate in negotiations while facing internal divisions on sanctions against Russia [2][4] Group 2 - Experts suggest that Europe's absence from the negotiations is a result of its long-term reliance on NATO and the United States for security, which has diminished its geopolitical independence and bargaining power [4] - If the US and Russia reach an agreement without considering European interests, Europe may be forced to accept unfavorable outcomes, highlighting the deep-seated contradictions in Europe's strategic autonomy [4]
马克龙为何力推欧洲主导乌克兰危机解决?美俄博弈下的主权陷阱与战略困局
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-10 17:21
Group 1 - The core argument is that European leaders, particularly President Macron, are advocating for Europe to take a leading role in resolving the Ukraine crisis, emphasizing that any solution must include European interests and perspectives [1][5][10] - Macron's call for European strategic autonomy reflects a response to the geopolitical tensions between the US and Russia, highlighting Europe's struggle for sovereignty and effective security governance [1][5][10] - The proposal for a European stabilization force in Ukraine aims to deter Russian aggression and ensure a stable ceasefire, although it faces logistical challenges and internal disagreements among EU member states [5][6][10] Group 2 - The geopolitical landscape is shifting, with a noticeable cooling in US-EU relations as Europe seeks to assert its own security interests independent of American influence [5][10] - The economic impact of the Ukraine conflict on Europe is significant, with losses exceeding 1 trillion euros due to disrupted energy trade and rising inflation, prompting calls for Europe to take responsibility for its own security [5][10] - The ongoing conflict has led to a humanitarian crisis, with the potential for further escalation if European military involvement is perceived as a direct threat by Russia [5][10] Group 3 - The narrative surrounding the Ukraine crisis is becoming increasingly polarized, with Western discourse framing it as a battle between democracy and authoritarianism, while ignoring the complexities of the situation [7][10] - The lack of a unified European defense strategy and the reliance on NATO highlight the challenges Europe faces in establishing an independent security framework [5][10] - The crisis has exposed the fragility of global governance structures, as Europe grapples with the consequences of its historical reliance on US military support [10]
英法德首脑频频互动,“欧洲三巨头”抱团绝非巧合
Qi Lu Wan Bao Wang· 2025-07-25 11:13
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the increasing alignment of diplomatic, economic, security, and immigration policies among France, Germany, and the UK, referred to as the "European trio" [1] - Macron's state visit to the UK marked the first visit by a French head of state in 17 years and the first by an EU leader post-Brexit, while Merkel's visit was his first as German Chancellor [1][3] - The UK and France signed the "Northwood Declaration," coordinating their independent nuclear deterrent capabilities, while the UK and Germany signed the "Kensington Treaty," covering security, defense, immigration, economy, and open society [1][3] Group 2 - The "Kensington Treaty" includes a commitment for mutual military assistance in the event of armed attacks, reflecting a lack of confidence in NATO's collective defense commitments [1][2] - The shift in the US stance on European security, as articulated by Defense Secretary Hagel and Vice President Pence, indicates a demand for European allies to take greater responsibility for their own defense [2] - Macron's emphasis on France's nuclear deterrent and the extension of the "nuclear umbrella" to Germany signifies a strategic shift towards European defense autonomy [3][4] Group 3 - The recent deployment of a US C-17 heavy transport aircraft to the UK, potentially carrying new B61-12 nuclear bombs, suggests a re-establishment of US nuclear capabilities in Europe [4][5] - Trump's administration's actions, including the push for increased military spending among NATO members and the controversial arms support for Ukraine, have created divisions within NATO [5] - The refusal of several NATO countries to support the US's plan to rearm Ukraine indicates a growing rift and the need for European nations to reassess their defense strategies in light of US policies [5]
美国卖、乌克兰收、北约付:这笔武器交易透着特朗普味儿
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-07-15 04:55
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the U.S. decision to provide Ukraine with Patriot missile systems through NATO, with NATO covering the costs, indicating a shift in U.S. policy regarding military aid to Ukraine [1][2][3] - The U.S. has provided significant military aid to Ukraine, totaling $106 billion in direct military assistance and over $60 billion in indirect aid as of last year, which has caused dissatisfaction among some factions within the U.S. [2][3] - The recent increase in Russian drone and missile attacks has heightened Ukraine's air defense pressure, leading to the decision to supply advanced military equipment [2][3] Group 2 - NATO's agreement to fund the Patriot missile systems was reached during the June 25 summit, where the U.S. sought to address internal dissatisfaction from the MAGA faction regarding military spending [3][4] - The NATO summit aimed to align with Trump's demands, including a commitment to increase military spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, despite some member countries expressing reluctance [3][4] - Germany is identified as the most likely contributor to the funding for the Patriot systems, with indications of interest from other European partners [4][5] Group 3 - The potential for NATO to regularly fund U.S. military sales is questioned due to existing defense budget shortfalls among European members, which complicates the sustainability of such arrangements [4][5] - The ongoing U.S. congressional plans to grant Trump authority to impose tariffs on countries perceived as aiding Russia could have more significant implications than NATO's funding of military equipment [5]
国际观察丨增强“对美免疫力” 英法能否冰释前嫌
Xin Hua She· 2025-07-11 12:41
Core Points - The visit of French President Macron to the UK marks the first visit by an EU leader post-Brexit, aiming to enhance military cooperation, illegal immigration management, and economic investment between the two nations [1][2] - The backdrop of increasing strategic anxiety in Europe due to reduced US security commitments under the Trump administration has prompted the UK and France to "restart" their bilateral relations [1][3] Group 1: Bilateral Relations - Macron's visit included high-level meetings with King Charles III and Prime Minister Starmer, culminating in the signing of the "Northwood Declaration," which coordinates nuclear deterrent capabilities between the two countries [2] - The declaration states that any threat to the core interests of either the UK or France could result in a joint nuclear response, highlighting the importance of defense and security cooperation [2][3] Group 2: Immigration and Economic Cooperation - The UK and France reached an "entry-exit" agreement to manage illegal immigration, where illegal migrants arriving by small boats will be detained and returned to France, while an equal number will be allowed to enter the UK through legal channels [2] - Both nations also announced plans to strengthen trade and investment cooperation, particularly in areas such as supercomputing, space, and artificial intelligence [2] Group 3: Challenges and Structural Issues - Despite the apparent unity, structural issues remain due to historical tensions from Brexit, illegal immigration, and fishing rights, which will continue to test the relationship between the two governments [4][5] - The complexity of balancing relations with the US while addressing mutual interests poses a significant challenge for the UK government, particularly in light of domestic pressures from far-right and anti-immigration forces [4][5]
被遗忘的乌克兰
虎嗅APP· 2025-07-06 13:23
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent decision by the U.S. to pause military aid to Ukraine, highlighting the implications for both Ukraine and Russia, as well as the shifting dynamics in international relations regarding the conflict [3][4]. Summary by Sections U.S. Military Aid to Ukraine - The U.S. has decided to pause the supply of military aid to Ukraine, which includes various types of weapons such as air defense missiles and artillery shells, with quantities ranging from dozens to thousands [3]. - This decision was reportedly driven by concerns over U.S. weapon stockpiles, rather than being a top-down directive from high-level officials [3][4]. Reactions and Implications - The decision shocked U.S. lawmakers and European allies, with some Republican members criticizing the influence of Pentagon officials on this matter [3]. - The Kremlin welcomed the U.S. decision, suggesting that fewer weapons sent to Ukraine could lead to a quicker end to military operations [4]. Diplomatic Developments - French President Macron's recent conversation with Putin marked a significant diplomatic engagement, as it was the first in nearly three years, indicating a potential shift in European strategy towards Russia [4][5]. - Macron's motives for the call may include testing Russia's limits, enhancing France's negotiating position, and subtly pressuring Ukraine to consider compromises [5][6][8]. Current Military Situation - The article notes that approximately 600,000 Russian troops are currently engaged in the conflict, with a significant portion involved in frontline operations [9]. - Recent territorial gains by Russian forces include the occupation of 4,168 square kilometers in 2024 and an additional 2,500 square kilometers in the first half of 2025 [9][19]. Economic Considerations - The article highlights the unsustainable nature of Russia's economic model, which has seen increased military spending at the expense of private sector stability [18][19]. - The European Union has been providing substantial financial aid to Ukraine, with over $100 billion annually, primarily for government salaries and social support, raising questions about the sustainability of such funding [19][20]. Geopolitical Context - Ukraine has become a focal point in geopolitical tensions, with its government and societal structures adapting to the ongoing war [21][22]. - The potential for a ceasefire or reconstruction remains uncertain, as the current leadership is more familiar with wartime conditions than with peacetime governance [23].