Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the company is strengthening its legal team as a necessary response to a complex environment, despite preferring to allocate resources to research and development [1] Group 2 - The company officially refuted rumors about having a "7000-person legal team" while acknowledging the need to enhance its legal team [1] - The company described the decision to strengthen the legal team as a "forced move" rather than a preferred strategy [1]