原标题：《现实版"宫斗大戏"！佛山某5000余人小区新老物业交接两个月仍未成功》 | 二、投票统计结果 | | | | --- | --- | --- | | 参与投票的人数:1384人 参与投票的面积:153715.07m2 | | | | 参与投票的人数占投票涉及总人数 参与投票的面积占投票涉及总面 比例:67.64% 积比例:69.95% | | | | 表决事项:是否同意续聘原物业服务公司(奥园智慧生活服务(广 州)集团有限公司南海分公司) | | | | 表决规则:应当由专有部分面积占比三分之二以上的业主且人数占比 三分之二以上的业主参与表决,参与表决专有部分面积过半数的业主 且参与表决人数过半数的业主同意,表决通过。 | | | | 同意该项人 同意该项 | 同意该项面 | 同意该项面 | | 炭洗项内容 数占参与人 人数 数比例 | 积(㎡) | 积数占参与 面积比例 | | 同意 367 26. 52% | 39111.88 | 25. 44% | | 不同意 974 70. 38% | 109507. 27 | 71.24% | | 弃权 44 3.18% 3. 36% | 5171.81 ...

Core Viewpoint - The property handover at Junhu Tianxia Garden in Nanhai District, Foshan, has not been completed over two months past the scheduled date, leading to a standoff between the new and old property management companies, with legal disputes and internal divisions among homeowners complicating the situation [1][3]. Group 1: Property Management Transition - The total construction area of Junhu Tianxia Garden is approximately 246,000 square meters, housing over 5,000 residents across 2,046 units [1]. - The new property management company, Guangdong Hongde Technology Property Co., Ltd. (Hongde Property), was awarded the contract in October 2025, with the expectation to take over by November 3, 2025 [3][5]. - The old property management company, Aoyuan Smart Life Service (Guangzhou) Group Co., Ltd. (Aoyuan Property), has refused to vacate, citing procedural flaws in the decision to replace them [1][9]. Group 2: Homeowner Committee and Internal Divisions - The homeowner committee held its first meeting in April 2025, where four key issues were voted on, all of which passed with more than two-thirds support [3]. - Homeowners are divided into three factions: one supports the committee and the new property management, another opposes the new management, and a third group is anxious about the transition and service quality [9][10]. - The internal division among homeowners has exacerbated the deadlock, making it difficult to reach a consensus for resolution [10]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Context - According to the regulations, the old property management should vacate within 15 days after the contract termination, regardless of any disputes regarding the homeowner committee's decisions [10]. - Similar disputes have been reported nationwide, where old property management companies refuse to vacate, leading to legal interventions to enforce compliance [10][11]. - A study indicated that 85% of property management exits were voluntary, primarily due to financial pressures, highlighting the economic challenges faced by property management firms [11][12].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the ongoing conflict between the old property management company, Aoyuan Smart Life Service (Guangzhou) Group Co., Ltd., and the newly appointed property management company, Guangdong Hongde Technology Property Co., Ltd., regarding the handover process that has not been completed as of now [2][3][6] - The property management transition was supposed to occur on November 3, 2025, but has been delayed due to legal disputes and opposition from some homeowners against the new property management [2][3] - The homeowners' committee held a vote in April 2025, where the majority agreed to appoint a new property management company, leading to the selection of Hongde Property in October 2025, but the old management refuses to vacate, citing procedural flaws [3][4][6] Group 2 - The internal division among homeowners has complicated the situation, with three factions emerging: one supporting the homeowners' committee, another opposing the new property management, and a third group expressing concerns about service quality from both the old and new management [10][11] - The refusal of the old property management to vacate is based on their claim that the previous vote did not explicitly state their dismissal, which has led to a stalemate [10][11] - Similar disputes have been noted in other regions, indicating a broader trend of conflicts arising from property management transitions, often requiring legal intervention to resolve [11][12] Group 3 - The overall trend in the property management industry shows that a significant number of property management companies are exiting contracts due to financial pressures, with 85% of cases being voluntary exits driven by long-term losses and low collection rates [12] - The presence of a homeowners' committee significantly influences the efficiency of transitioning to new property management, with established committees facilitating smoother processes compared to those without [12]