Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that after failing in the trade war with China, Trump has shifted his focus to other countries, achieving what he perceives as "victories" through unequal agreements, particularly with the EU and Japan [1][3] - The recent trade agreement with the EU requires the EU to pay 15% tariffs, invest $600 billion in the US, import $750 billion in US energy, and purchase significant amounts of US military equipment, indicating a strategic advantage for the US in global trade negotiations [1][3] - Analysts suggest that Trump's ability to exploit this "century loophole" stems from the US's continued advantages in global affairs, particularly in military capabilities compared to other nations [3] Group 2 - A Spanish expert criticized the EU for lacking independence and strategic autonomy, suggesting that it is being led by the US and is unable to assert itself in global negotiations [5] - The recent agreements, while seemingly beneficial for the US, raise questions about their actual implementation and the need for approval from the European Parliament, indicating potential challenges ahead [7] - Trump's announcements often focus on the perceived benefits for the US without providing details on the actual terms and timelines, suggesting a strategy to capture market attention rather than ensuring the agreements' validity [7]