全球关税战

Search documents
特朗普抓到一个世纪漏洞,只要不招惹中国,美国就是“无敌的”
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-22 07:29
Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that after failing in the trade war with China, Trump has shifted his focus to other countries, achieving what he perceives as "victories" through unequal agreements, particularly with the EU and Japan [1][3] - The recent trade agreement with the EU requires the EU to pay 15% tariffs, invest $600 billion in the US, import $750 billion in US energy, and purchase significant amounts of US military equipment, indicating a strategic advantage for the US in global trade negotiations [1][3] - Analysts suggest that Trump's ability to exploit this "century loophole" stems from the US's continued advantages in global affairs, particularly in military capabilities compared to other nations [3] Group 2 - A Spanish expert criticized the EU for lacking independence and strategic autonomy, suggesting that it is being led by the US and is unable to assert itself in global negotiations [5] - The recent agreements, while seemingly beneficial for the US, raise questions about their actual implementation and the need for approval from the European Parliament, indicating potential challenges ahead [7] - Trump's announcements often focus on the perceived benefits for the US without providing details on the actual terms and timelines, suggesting a strategy to capture market attention rather than ensuring the agreements' validity [7]
特朗普没想到,关税极限施压没用了,日韩态度坚决,印度出人意料
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-13 05:00
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the intensifying global trade tensions due to President Trump's announcement of punitive tariffs on imports from Japan and South Korea, as well as other countries, indicating a potential escalation in the global tariff war [1][3]. - Trump's strategy of "maximum pressure" is seen as a last-ditch effort, reflecting his administration's diminishing confidence as countries adopt a "delay tactic" to exhaust U.S. patience [1][3]. - Japan and South Korea have expressed strong dissatisfaction with the tariff announcements and are committed to negotiating with the U.S. to protect their economic interests, showcasing their determination not to yield easily to U.S. pressure [5]. Group 2 - India's unexpected stance of negotiating from a position of strength without a deadline poses a significant challenge to Trump's tariff strategy, suggesting that if other countries follow suit, it could undermine the effectiveness of the tariffs [5]. - The European Union's potential inability to withstand ongoing pressure from Trump raises concerns about the unity of countries opposing U.S. trade dominance, which could weaken the collective resistance against the tariffs [5]. - The possibility of the EU conceding to U.S. demands could significantly alter the global trade landscape, providing an opportunity for the Trump administration and indicating a major shift in global trade dynamics [5].
对外政策“颠覆”国际秩序,最新民调数据“引发不安”,特朗普执政百日引复杂评说
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-04-28 22:24
Core Points - Trump's administration has signed 139 executive orders in a short period, nearing the total of his predecessor's four-year term [1] - Public support for the current administration is at its lowest in 70 years, with only 41% approval for its first 100 days [3][4] - The administration's economic policies, particularly regarding tariffs, have led to significant public discontent and a decline in stock market performance [5][6] Group 1: Executive Actions and Public Response - Trump's rapid signing of executive orders has been noted as unprecedented since Franklin D. Roosevelt, with significant implications for governance [1] - The administration's approval ratings are historically low, with 55% of respondents disapproving of its performance [4] - A majority of Americans feel the government is overly focused on tariffs, with 62% expressing this sentiment [4] Group 2: Economic Policies and Market Impact - The S&P 500 index has dropped approximately 8% since the new administration took office, indicating market concerns over economic policies [5] - Support for the administration's handling of inflation has decreased by 9 percentage points to 35% [3] - Confidence in Trump's economic management has fallen by 13 percentage points since December, now at 52% [3] Group 3: Foreign Policy and Global Relations - The administration's foreign policy approach has been criticized for undermining traditional alliances and initiating a "global tariff war" [6] - Public support for the administration's foreign policy is low, with only 39% approval [6] - The administration's stance has led to shifts in international relations, with allies seeking to bolster their own defense capabilities [6]