新华社北京5月27日电 题：聚焦民生"小事" 看民法典如何保护你我权益 新华社记者冯家顺、罗沙 被誉为"社会生活百科全书"的民法典，与每个人的生活息息相关。 小区业主纠纷、职场性骚扰、"饭圈"文化治理……今年是民法典颁布五周年，最高人民法院近日发布的 相关系列典型案例中，有不少聚焦民生关键"小事"，保护你我合法权益，推动民法典更好"典"亮千家万 户。 老房子加装电梯惹争议，怎么办？ 老旧小区加装电梯，是关乎居民出行便利、居住品质提升的重要民生工程，同时也容易引发邻里争议。 江苏无锡某小区某单元徐某等全体业主一致签字同意本单元增设电梯，并于小区主要出入口及单元楼道 张贴意见征集单、公示、承诺及图纸等相关材料，公示期间没有人提出异议。随后，这个增设电梯的项 目取得了主管部门的审批手续并正式开工。 然而，住在该单元北楼的业主范某却不干了。范某认为，该电梯安装位置影响自家采光，就多次在加装 电梯施工现场阻碍施工，导致项目停工。徐某等业主把范某告上法庭，请求判令范某停止对加装电梯工 程的妨害行为。 案件办理法官介绍，依照民法典关于相邻关系的规定，相邻关系应当按照有利生产、方便生活、团结互 助、公平合理的原则处理，案涉住 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of the Civil Code in enhancing judicial efficiency and addressing public concerns, particularly in areas affecting daily life and rights protection [1] - The Supreme People's Court has released a series of typical cases to illustrate the implementation of the Civil Code, focusing on issues such as property rights, elder rights protection, and workplace harassment [1][4] - The cases highlight the judiciary's commitment to serving the public and ensuring that legal services meet the needs of the community [1][4] Group 2 - The case regarding the installation of elevators in old residential buildings underscores the significance of neighborly relations and the legal framework governing property rights, with a ruling favoring the majority of homeowners [2][3] - The court's decision reflects the balance between individual rights and community benefits, promoting a harmonious living environment [3][4] - The ruling serves as a precedent for similar disputes, reinforcing the principle of mutual understanding among neighbors [3][4] Group 3 - The case involving the installation of electric vehicle charging stations emphasizes the responsibility of property management companies to facilitate such installations, aligning with national energy-saving initiatives [7][8] - The court ruled that property management must support homeowners' rights to install charging facilities, reflecting a commitment to environmental sustainability [8][9] - This case illustrates the judiciary's role in addressing practical issues faced by residents, thereby enhancing their living conditions [9] Group 4 - The case concerning the elderly care service contract highlights the legal obligations of service providers to adhere to contractual agreements, particularly in the context of elder care [11][12] - The court's ruling mandates the return of prepaid fees to the plaintiff, reinforcing the importance of service quality in the elder care industry [12][13] - This case serves as a guideline for the development of the elder care sector, ensuring that the rights of senior citizens are protected [13] Group 5 - The workplace harassment case illustrates the legal framework surrounding employee rights and employer responsibilities, particularly in preventing sexual harassment [18][19] - The court upheld the company's decision to terminate an employee for violating established conduct rules, emphasizing the importance of a safe work environment [19][21] - This ruling reinforces the legal standards for workplace behavior and the protection of employees' dignity [21] Group 6 - The case involving online defamation among fans highlights the legal implications of social media interactions and the protection of personal reputation [23][24] - The court's decision to hold individuals accountable for defamatory statements reflects the judiciary's role in maintaining a respectful online environment [24][25] - This case sets a precedent for addressing online harassment and promoting responsible behavior among internet users [25][26] Group 7 - The traffic accident case involving an elderly worker emphasizes the need for legal protections for older individuals in the workforce, particularly regarding compensation for lost income [30][31] - The court's ruling supports the claim for lost wages, recognizing the ongoing contributions of older workers to the economy [31][32] - This case highlights the importance of safeguarding the rights of elderly individuals in labor-related matters, promoting their active participation in society [32][33]

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the conflict between individual actions aimed at wildlife protection and the rights of neighbors, emphasizing the need for balance between personal interests and community harmony [1][2]. Group 1: Case Background - Liu, a resident of a community, is disturbed by her upstairs neighbor Wang's bird feeding activities, which lead to bird droppings and noise affecting her quality of life [1]. - Liu attempts to resolve the issue through communication but ultimately files a lawsuit to have Wang's bird feeding setup removed [1]. Group 2: Court Ruling - The court finds that Wang's bird feeding setup indeed obstructs Liu's use of her property, supporting Liu's request for removal based on the evidence of bird droppings and safety concerns [2]. - Following the ruling, Wang complies and removes the bird feeding setup without filing an appeal, indicating acceptance of the court's decision [2]. Group 3: Legal Principles - The case underscores the legal principle that actions taken in the name of goodwill, such as feeding birds, must not infringe upon the rights of others, as outlined in the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China [2]. - The court emphasizes the importance of maintaining neighborly relations and balancing individual rights with community considerations [2].