养老院里的性骚扰，像房间里的大象，明明无处不在，却有人假装看不见。 在一个多月里，56岁的女护工李珍（化名）遭遇了两次性骚扰。对方，是她所服务的一位住在养老院里 异性老人，今年90岁。 按照养老院的程序，性格刚烈的李珍作了一层层的申诉，也被要求一次次地复述。结果并未如她所愿， 反而和院方管理者、老人及其家属，各执一词上演了一场旷日持久的"罗生门"。 护工 噩梦，始于三个多月前。 4月16日，早上5：20，上海某高端养老院里响起了呼叫铃。李珍像往常一样，轻敲VIP单人套间201的 门，询问老人的需求。 养老院的护理和收费标准都有明文规定，像刘教授这种能自理的老人，晨起服务内容并不包括帮忙洗 漱。 包括刘教授在内，李珍一人要负责近10位自理老人，任务繁重，鞋子跑脱胶了顾不上换是常有的事。 房间里住着一位90岁的男性老人，退休前任职于某大学，李珍们尊称他为"刘教授"。 刘教授年岁已高，但身体很是健朗，有较好的自理能力。住进来3个月，基本上都是他自己独立完成晨 起洗漱、服药等日常事务。 这次却与往常有些不同。 李珍帮刘教授摇好床，他突然说自己不想动，并请求李珍"帮忙洗脸"。 当时，李珍以为刘教授身体不适，并没有在意这 ...

新华社北京5月27日电 题：聚焦民生"小事" 看民法典如何保护你我权益 新华社记者冯家顺、罗沙 被誉为"社会生活百科全书"的民法典，与每个人的生活息息相关。 小区业主纠纷、职场性骚扰、"饭圈"文化治理……今年是民法典颁布五周年，最高人民法院近日发布的 相关系列典型案例中，有不少聚焦民生关键"小事"，保护你我合法权益，推动民法典更好"典"亮千家万 户。 老房子加装电梯惹争议，怎么办？ 老旧小区加装电梯，是关乎居民出行便利、居住品质提升的重要民生工程，同时也容易引发邻里争议。 江苏无锡某小区某单元徐某等全体业主一致签字同意本单元增设电梯，并于小区主要出入口及单元楼道 张贴意见征集单、公示、承诺及图纸等相关材料，公示期间没有人提出异议。随后，这个增设电梯的项 目取得了主管部门的审批手续并正式开工。 然而，住在该单元北楼的业主范某却不干了。范某认为，该电梯安装位置影响自家采光，就多次在加装 电梯施工现场阻碍施工，导致项目停工。徐某等业主把范某告上法庭，请求判令范某停止对加装电梯工 程的妨害行为。 案件办理法官介绍，依照民法典关于相邻关系的规定，相邻关系应当按照有利生产、方便生活、团结互 助、公平合理的原则处理，案涉住 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of the Civil Code in enhancing judicial efficiency and addressing public concerns, particularly in areas affecting daily life and rights protection [1] - The Supreme People's Court has released a series of typical cases to illustrate the implementation of the Civil Code, focusing on issues such as property rights, elder rights protection, and workplace harassment [1][4] - The cases highlight the judiciary's commitment to serving the public and ensuring that legal services meet the needs of the community [1][4] Group 2 - The case regarding the installation of elevators in old residential buildings underscores the significance of neighborly relations and the legal framework governing property rights, with a ruling favoring the majority of homeowners [2][3] - The court's decision reflects the balance between individual rights and community benefits, promoting a harmonious living environment [3][4] - The ruling serves as a precedent for similar disputes, reinforcing the principle of mutual understanding among neighbors [3][4] Group 3 - The case involving the installation of electric vehicle charging stations emphasizes the responsibility of property management companies to facilitate such installations, aligning with national energy-saving initiatives [7][8] - The court ruled that property management must support homeowners' rights to install charging facilities, reflecting a commitment to environmental sustainability [8][9] - This case illustrates the judiciary's role in addressing practical issues faced by residents, thereby enhancing their living conditions [9] Group 4 - The case concerning the elderly care service contract highlights the legal obligations of service providers to adhere to contractual agreements, particularly in the context of elder care [11][12] - The court's ruling mandates the return of prepaid fees to the plaintiff, reinforcing the importance of service quality in the elder care industry [12][13] - This case serves as a guideline for the development of the elder care sector, ensuring that the rights of senior citizens are protected [13] Group 5 - The workplace harassment case illustrates the legal framework surrounding employee rights and employer responsibilities, particularly in preventing sexual harassment [18][19] - The court upheld the company's decision to terminate an employee for violating established conduct rules, emphasizing the importance of a safe work environment [19][21] - This ruling reinforces the legal standards for workplace behavior and the protection of employees' dignity [21] Group 6 - The case involving online defamation among fans highlights the legal implications of social media interactions and the protection of personal reputation [23][24] - The court's decision to hold individuals accountable for defamatory statements reflects the judiciary's role in maintaining a respectful online environment [24][25] - This case sets a precedent for addressing online harassment and promoting responsible behavior among internet users [25][26] Group 7 - The traffic accident case involving an elderly worker emphasizes the need for legal protections for older individuals in the workforce, particularly regarding compensation for lost income [30][31] - The court's ruling supports the claim for lost wages, recognizing the ongoing contributions of older workers to the economy [31][32] - This case highlights the importance of safeguarding the rights of elderly individuals in labor-related matters, promoting their active participation in society [32][33]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the British mini-series "Douglas," which has gained popularity for its exploration of themes such as misogyny, journalistic ethics, and cancel culture, highlighting the complexities of victimhood and accountability in contemporary society [3][13]. Summary by Sections Overview of "Douglas" - "Douglas" is a four-episode British mini-series that initially had a low profile but gained traction in China, with its Douban rating increasing from 9.0 to 9.4 [2]. Themes and Character Dynamics - The series intricately portrays multiple issues, including misogyny and cancel culture, through the character of Madeline, who seeks revenge against her male colleague Douglas, ultimately becoming a news icon [3][4]. - Madeline is depicted as a strong character, contrasting with the traditional victim narrative, and her actions raise questions about the nature of female empowerment and morality [3][5]. Narrative Structure - The story begins from Douglas's perspective, presenting him as an innocent victim of a Twitter rumor that accuses him of making misogynistic jokes, which he claims not to remember [4][5]. - The narrative shifts to reveal the complexities of power dynamics, particularly in the context of workplace harassment, as Madeline navigates her own challenges while orchestrating Douglas's downfall [6][7]. Cancel Culture and Its Implications - The series critiques cancel culture, illustrating how it can serve as both a protective mechanism for marginalized groups and a tool for public shaming, often lacking genuine moral reflection [13][14]. - Douglas's downfall is not solely due to his alleged misogynistic joke but rather his broader failure to engage with the truth and the public's perception of him [14]. Character Analysis - Madeline's actions, while seemingly empowering, also reflect the moral ambiguities present in the narrative, as she embodies traits typically associated with male characters in power [15]. - The series invites viewers to question the nature of victory and whether Madeline's personal triumph represents a broader success for women or merely an individual achievement [15][16]. Conclusion - "Douglas" serves as a commentary on the complexities of gender dynamics, power, and accountability in modern society, encouraging a deeper examination of the roles individuals play within these frameworks [12][15].