Workflow
破除迷信
icon
Search documents
蔡畅“把雷公吓倒了”
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-02-25 16:55
就这样,江西苏区农村掀起了妇女学犁耕地的热潮,适时地播了种,插了秧,没有一块田地撂荒,也没 有一个妇女遭"雷公"打。当地妇女说:"蔡大姐,有胆有识,把雷公吓倒了。" (来源:市场星报) 中华苏维埃共和国主席毛泽东巡视了各地的春耕生产,他高度赞扬江西妇女移风易俗,学会犁田耕地, 成为农业生产主力军的事迹。 1932年蔡畅和丈夫李富春由上海白区来到了中央苏区,蔡畅被分配到江西省委做妇女工作。 妇女们与蔡畅熟悉之后,奇怪她怎么没有生孩子呢?蔡畅二话没说,掀开衣服,露出肚皮的伤疤,告诉 她们,她只有一个女儿,在法国生孩子的时候就结扎了,以后再不会生孩子了。 令蔡畅不明白的是,苏区妇女在动员青壮年参加红军,运输粮食和弹药,护理病员等繁重工作中,干得 很出色,可就是不下田,这是为什么呢? 蔡畅的举动震惊了在场所有的妇女,唤醒了许多妇女的革命愿望,她们成为蔡畅的追随者,积极宣传苏 维埃政府《婚姻条例》,开展识字运动,苏区妇女的家庭、社会地位逐步得以提高。 据《人民政协 报》 顾保孜 蔡畅到农村走家串户,才知道这里从来就不让妇女犁田耕地,认为妇女犁田耕地要遭雷公打的。情况摸 清了,蔡畅决心移风易俗,打破强加妇女头上的精神枷锁 ...
韩笑鹏:毛泽东的这场谈话,点破了拉美靠什么才能真正“逆天改命”
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-17 01:16
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the historical dialogue between Mao Zedong and Latin American communist leaders in 1959, highlighting the contrasting economic trajectories of China and Latin America over the past six decades, emphasizing China's successful industrialization and the challenges faced by Latin American countries. Group 1: Historical Context - In March 1959, Mao Zedong met with leaders from 12 Latin American countries, acknowledging China's economic struggles compared to their relatively prosperous nations [3][4]. - At that time, countries like Argentina and Venezuela were economically advanced, while China was just beginning its industrialization journey [4][5]. Group 2: Economic Development - Over the past 60 years, China has developed a comprehensive industrial system, dominating global high-speed rail and advancing in AI and quantum computing, while many Latin American countries remain stagnant or trapped in the "middle-income trap" [4][8]. - Mao's concept of "breaking the superstition" about Western superiority is identified as a key factor in China's economic transformation [4][8]. Group 3: Psychological Barriers - Mao pointed out the psychological barriers of "fear of the West" and "worship of the West" that hindered development in many countries, emphasizing the need to overcome these beliefs for independent growth [5][6]. - The article argues that the lack of a critical perspective on Western dominance has led to a failure in Latin America's industrialization efforts [6][8]. Group 4: Social Revolution - The article highlights the importance of social revolution in China's industrialization, which involved a complete restructuring of society, unlike Latin America, where feudal structures persisted [12][13]. - China's land reform and social revolution allowed for direct mobilization of resources for industrialization, contrasting with Latin America's reliance on landowners [14][16]. Group 5: Political and Economic Sovereignty - The article discusses the significance of political sovereignty and the ability to resist external pressures, particularly from the U.S., in achieving industrialization [26][29]. - It emphasizes that without a strong state capable of asserting independence, countries like those in Latin America struggle to develop high-end industries [22][29]. Group 6: Lessons for Development - The article concludes with lessons for developing countries, stressing the need to break free from outdated social structures and to challenge the notion of Western superiority to achieve true industrialization [32][33]. - It advocates for a proactive approach to industrialization, where countries must not only adopt foreign technologies but also develop their own capabilities to compete globally [24][33].