Workflow
硅料收储方案
icon
Search documents
硅料“收储”不能背离市场化法治化
Jing Ji Guan Cha Wang· 2025-09-05 08:48
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the emergence of a "polysilicon storage plan" led by major polysilicon companies to acquire and phase out outdated production capacity, aiming to adjust the industry structure and combat internal competition [1] - The polysilicon industry is facing low capacity utilization and declining product prices, leading to losses for major companies, which has prompted the consideration of the "storage plan" [1] - The proposed storage plan is characterized by a market-oriented approach, contrasting with traditional administrative methods of capacity adjustment, and may represent a new path for the industry [1] Group 2 - There are significant antitrust risks associated with the capacity coordination mechanism led by industry associations or major companies, as it may violate the Anti-Monopoly Law by fixing prices or limiting production [2] - The legal compliance of the storage plan is a critical challenge, as failure to navigate antitrust risks could hinder its implementation and pose future risks for the solar industry [2] Group 3 - While the storage plan may provide short-term relief for the industry, it is essential to evaluate its potential long-term negative impacts, such as increased market concentration benefiting major companies and potential price increases for polysilicon [3] - The stock prices of leading polysilicon companies have begun to recover, and the storage plan could allow these companies to gain market share and profits while facilitating a mild exit for smaller firms [4] Group 4 - The "pain-free" exit strategy of the storage plan raises concerns about its impact on industry efficiency, as competition is a vital mechanism in market economies [4] - The risk exists that the cooperative mechanisms formed during the storage plan could evolve into a price or capacity alliance, which would violate antitrust principles and harm industry development [4] Group 5 - It is crucial to establish clear boundaries and enhance antitrust supervision during and after the implementation of the storage plan to ensure it remains market-oriented and lawful [5] - The design of the storage plan should protect the interests of smaller companies, and a reasonable mechanism should be established to hold some companies accountable for past capacity expansion decisions [5] - The internal competition issues in the polysilicon industry are complex and require more than just capacity adjustments; they involve government actions, misjudgments by major companies, and institutional factors like inadequate intellectual property protection [5]