Core Viewpoint - The recent launch of the "1+6" new policy for the Sci-Tech Innovation Board (STAR Market) by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has garnered significant market attention, particularly the reintroduction and expansion of the fifth listing standard, which opens up opportunities for high-quality unprofitable companies to go public [1][3][4] Group 1: Policy Changes and Implications - The fifth listing standard has been expanded to cover cutting-edge fields such as artificial intelligence, commercial aerospace, and low-altitude economy, enhancing the inclusivity and adaptability of the capital market for hard-tech companies [3][4] - The introduction of a new "U" label for unprofitable companies in the newly established Sci-Tech Growth Layer aims to improve transparency and help investors better identify and assess risks associated with these companies [9][10] - The new policy encourages collaboration between companies and experienced institutional investors, which is expected to enhance the identification and support of high-quality unprofitable enterprises [5][6] Group 2: Market Dynamics and Investor Considerations - The involvement of seasoned institutional investors is designed to provide a more accurate assessment of companies' innovation potential beyond just financial metrics, thereby guiding capital towards promising unprofitable firms [5][6] - The policy may lead to a situation where companies seek to partner with institutional investors primarily to meet listing requirements, potentially resulting in superficial collaborations rather than genuine partnerships [7][8] - The establishment of differentiated exit standards for companies in the Sci-Tech Growth Layer aims to ensure that only those with sustainable growth and profitability can transition out, thereby enhancing market quality [11][12] Group 3: IPO Pre-Review Mechanism - The newly introduced IPO pre-review mechanism allows companies to identify and address potential issues before formal submission, which could shorten the review cycle and increase the likelihood of successful listings [14][15] - This mechanism is particularly suited for strategic emerging industries with clear core technology projects that have significant implications for national and industry development [15] - However, the pre-review process may not fully uncover all issues, and there are concerns about the lack of transparency and potential information asymmetry in the market [16][17][18]