Group 1: Technology Evaluation Mechanism - The meeting emphasized the need to improve the technology achievement evaluation mechanism, focusing on what to evaluate, who evaluates, how to evaluate, and how to utilize the evaluations [4] - A multi-dimensional evaluation system involving government, social organizations, enterprises, and investment institutions is to be established, highlighting the role of enterprises in innovation [4][3] - The evaluation should be based on quality, performance, and contribution, with specific standards for different types of research outcomes [4][3] Group 2: Education Reform - The meeting identified the heavy burden on students in compulsory education as a significant issue, particularly the unregulated growth of extracurricular training institutions [5] - It was stressed that improving school teaching quality is essential to reduce student burdens, alongside a comprehensive reform of educational practices [5] - Strict management and regulation of extracurricular training institutions are to be enforced, with clear standards for fees and operations [5] Group 3: Medical Service Price Reform - The meeting highlighted that medical service pricing is a critical concern for the public, with recent reforms aimed at reducing drug and consumable costs [6][7] - A structured management system for medical service pricing is to be established, balancing the needs of healthcare development with affordability for the public [7] - The importance of a dynamic pricing adjustment mechanism and comprehensive pilot programs for public hospitals was emphasized [7] Group 4: Ecological Protection Compensation - The meeting noted the establishment of ecological compensation mechanisms across various sectors, but highlighted issues such as limited coverage and weak enforcement [8] - A focus on green low-carbon development and comprehensive ecological protection is to be prioritized, integrating legal, administrative, and market approaches [8] - The need for a systematic approach to protect historical and cultural heritage in urban construction was also discussed [8]

Core Viewpoint - The China-Intelligence Science and Technology Evaluation Research Center has made significant contributions to national and local reform and development over the past five years, focusing on scientific and technological evaluation and innovation, and has established itself as an important new-type think tank in China [1][3][4]. Group 1: Achievements and Contributions - The center has developed the first national evaluation model for scientific and technological achievements (intellectual property) and participated in the formulation of national standards for evaluating scientific and technological achievements [3][4]. - It has launched the first intelligent diagnostic device for traditional Chinese medicine, the "Pulse Diagnosis Instrument," and facilitated the establishment of the first ammonia-hydrogen new energy vehicle project in Shiyan, Hubei [3]. - The center has created a closed-loop system integrating "standards-evaluation-certification-transaction-transformation" and has promoted a "four-lead" model for industrial chain development [3][4]. Group 2: Strategic Initiatives - The center has initiated and established various strategic projects, including the establishment of the Composite Materials Research Institute in collaboration with Jilin University and the Xiamen China-Intelligence BRICS Technology Innovation Service Center [3][4]. - It has coordinated the creation of technology innovation pilot parks and led the establishment of a comprehensive service platform for smart tea industry [3][4]. - The center has actively engaged in technology poverty alleviation and has been recognized for its contributions to the development of new-type think tanks with Chinese characteristics [4]. Group 3: Future Plans and Challenges - The newly elected leadership aims to address challenges such as the dynamic adaptability of evaluation standards and the optimization of interdisciplinary collaboration mechanisms [6][7]. - The center plans to focus on building a comprehensive dynamic evaluation system and enhancing its "discourse power" in technology evaluation [7]. - It seeks to innovate and explore new paths for high-quality development of new-type social think tanks in China, aiming to provide more guiding "China-Intelligence solutions" for the construction of a strong technological nation [7].