Group 1: Technology Evaluation Mechanism - The meeting emphasized the need to improve the technology achievement evaluation mechanism, focusing on what to evaluate, who evaluates, how to evaluate, and how to utilize the evaluations [4] - A multi-dimensional evaluation system involving government, social organizations, enterprises, and investment institutions is to be established, highlighting the role of enterprises in innovation [4][3] - The evaluation should be based on quality, performance, and contribution, with specific standards for different types of research outcomes [4][3] Group 2: Education Reform - The meeting identified the heavy burden on students in compulsory education as a significant issue, particularly the unregulated growth of extracurricular training institutions [5] - It was stressed that improving school teaching quality is essential to reduce student burdens, alongside a comprehensive reform of educational practices [5] - Strict management and regulation of extracurricular training institutions are to be enforced, with clear standards for fees and operations [5] Group 3: Medical Service Price Reform - The meeting highlighted that medical service pricing is a critical concern for the public, with recent reforms aimed at reducing drug and consumable costs [6][7] - A structured management system for medical service pricing is to be established, balancing the needs of healthcare development with affordability for the public [7] - The importance of a dynamic pricing adjustment mechanism and comprehensive pilot programs for public hospitals was emphasized [7] Group 4: Ecological Protection Compensation - The meeting noted the establishment of ecological compensation mechanisms across various sectors, but highlighted issues such as limited coverage and weak enforcement [8] - A focus on green low-carbon development and comprehensive ecological protection is to be prioritized, integrating legal, administrative, and market approaches [8] - The need for a systematic approach to protect historical and cultural heritage in urban construction was also discussed [8]

来源：人民政协网 5月18日，中智科学技术评价研究中心第二届理事会第十次会议暨第三届理事会第一次会议在北京召 开，各理事单位、理事、监事和列席代表通过线上与线下相结合的方式参加会议。会议由沈金华副主任 主持。李闽榕理事长兼主任向第二届理事会作工作报告。 会议认为，五年多来，中智科学技术评价研究中心积极主动为国家和地方改革发展服务、为产业行业企 业转型升级赋能，在科学技术评价理论研究、科技成果评价标准制订、成果转化实践创新等各项工作中 坚持党建引领，探索形成了以专业化、标准化、制度化、智能化和国际化为特色的协同创新发展模式， 为推动科技强国建设和国家经济社会高质量发展积极作为，充分发挥中国特色新型智库的重要作用，取 得了良好的社会影响和声誉。 会议认为，五年多来，中智科学技术评价研究中心围绕科技评价与创新主业，瞄准"制高点""新赛道"， 整合集聚科技创新资源，研创发布了全国首个科技成果（知识产权）评价大模型、参与研制发布了全国 首个科技成果评价国家标准和团体标准、研发揭榜全国首台中医智能检测设备"脉诊仪"、研究推动全国 首台氨氢新能源汽车项目落地湖北十堰、首创"标准-评价-认证-交易-转化"五位一体闭环式体系和 ...