虽然从目前物业费下调的小区数量与城市整体小区数量来看，占比依然较低，但从2021年至今小区物业换手率及收缴率来看，市场对物业服务满意度下行 明显。 近期，物业费"降价潮"备受关注。 多地小区物业宣布下调物业费，如2024年以来，武汉市已有超40个小区的物业公司宣布下调物业费，降幅普遍在10%到35%之间。 与此同时，目前全国已有10多个城市加入空置房物业费打折的行列。 究其缘由，主要受青岛、武汉、银川、武汉、广州等城市重申物业费指导价影响，部分业主质疑所在小区物业费显著高于政府指导价，要求物企对照政府 规定的物业服务标准，详细公示超等级物业服务方案或者下调物业费。 进入2025年，多个城市出台新规，对空置房物业费实施打折优惠，如江苏省镇江市对连续空置6个月以上的住宅物业费最多交70%、湖南省长沙市针对已 办理房屋交付手续却未入住或未使用的空置房，物业费交纳实行阶梯式优惠；甘肃省兰州市明确"空置"认定标准：需满足水、电、燃气连续6个月零使 用，且房屋未装修或未出租。 在房地产市场整体压力下，不少业主开始重新评估起物业服务的价值。 01 多城百余个项目下调物业费 整体占比不足1% 近期，全国多地小区物业费降价引发 ...

Core Viewpoint - The introduction of discounted property management fees for vacant homes reflects a response to the new dynamics in the real estate market and the demands of homeowners, aiming to alleviate financial burdens and improve relations between property owners and management companies [2][3][4]. Group 1: Policy Implementation - Multiple cities, including Changsha, Zhenjiang, and Qingdao, have initiated policies to reduce property management fees for vacant homes, with discounts ranging from 60% to 70% based on the duration of vacancy [2][3]. - Changsha's policy offers a tiered discount structure, where fees are reduced to 70% after 24 months of vacancy and to 90% thereafter [2]. - Zhenjiang allows a 70% fee for homes vacant for over six months, with negotiations for those vacant over 24 months [2]. Group 2: Market Response - Over ten cities have adopted similar discount policies, with a significant number located in Jiangsu province, indicating a growing trend in addressing the issue of vacant homes [3]. - The largest discount reported is in Lanzhou, where vacant homes for over six months can have fees reduced to 50% [3]. - Experts suggest that these policies not only ease the financial pressure on homeowners but also help to balance the long-standing conflicts between property management and owners [3][4]. Group 3: Industry Challenges and Opportunities - Property management companies face challenges due to reduced income from discounted fees, which may lead to cuts in service quality [4][5]. - Some companies view the situation as an opportunity to enhance service quality and diversify offerings, such as expanding into home services and community group purchases [5]. - The competitive landscape in the property management sector is intensifying, prompting companies to adapt their pricing strategies and improve service delivery to retain clients [5]. Group 4: Definition and Standardization Issues - There is currently no unified national definition of "vacant homes," leading to confusion and potential discrepancies in policy implementation [6]. - Different cities use varying criteria to define vacancy, such as the absence of utility usage or written confirmation from property owners [6]. - Legal experts emphasize the need for a standardized approach to avoid inconsistencies and ensure fair application of the discount policies across different regions [6].