空间表征
Search documents
视频生成 vs 空间表征,世界模型该走哪条路?
机器之心· 2025-08-24 01:30
Core Insights - The article discusses the ongoing debate in the AI and robotics industry regarding the optimal path for developing world models, focusing on video generation versus latent space representation [6][7][10]. Group 1: Video Generation vs Latent Space Representation - Google DeepMind's release of Genie 3, which can generate interactive 3D environments from text prompts, has reignited discussions on the effectiveness of pixel-level video prediction versus latent space modeling for world models [6]. - Proponents of video prediction argue that accurately generating high-quality videos indicates a model's understanding of physical and causal laws, while critics suggest that pixel consistency does not equate to causal understanding [10]. - The latent space modeling approach emphasizes abstract representation to avoid unnecessary computational costs associated with pixel-level predictions, focusing instead on learning temporal and causal structures [9]. Group 2: Divergence in Implementation Approaches - There is a clear divide in the industry regarding the implementation of world models, with some experts advocating for pixel-level predictions and others supporting latent space abstraction [8]. - The video prediction route typically involves reconstructing visual content frame by frame, while the latent space approach compresses environmental inputs into lower-dimensional representations for state evolution prediction [9]. - The debate centers on whether to start from pixel-level details and abstract upwards or to model directly in an abstract space, bypassing pixel intricacies [9]. Group 3: Recent Developments and Trends - The article highlights various recent models, including Sora, Veo 3, Runway Gen-3 Alpha, V-JEPA 2, and Genie 3, analyzing their core architectures and technical implementations to explore trends in real-world applications [11].
FindingDory:具身智能体记忆评估的基准测试
具身智能之心· 2025-06-22 10:56
Group 1 - The core issue in embodied intelligence is the lack of long-term memory, which limits the ability to process multimodal observational data across time and space [3] - Current visual language models (VLMs) excel in planning and control tasks but struggle with integrating historical experiences in embodied environments [3][5] - Existing video QA benchmarks fail to adequately assess tasks requiring fine-grained reasoning, such as object manipulation and navigation [5] Group 2 - The proposed benchmark includes a task architecture that allows for dynamic environment interaction and memory reasoning validation [4][6] - A total of 60 task categories are designed to cover spatiotemporal semantic memory challenges, including spatial relations, temporal reasoning, attribute memory, and multi-target recall [7] - Key technical innovations include a programmatic expansion of task complexity through increased interaction counts and a strict separation of experience collection from interaction phases [9][6] Group 3 - Experimental results reveal three major bottlenecks in VLM memory capabilities across 60 tasks, including failures in long-sequence reasoning, weak spatial representation, and collapse in multi-target processing [13][14][16] - The performance of native VLMs declines as the number of frames increases, indicating ineffective utilization of long contexts [20] - Supervised fine-tuning models show improved performance by leveraging longer historical data, suggesting a direction for VLM refinement [25] Group 4 - The benchmark represents the first photorealistic embodied memory evaluation framework, covering complex household environments and allowing for scalable assessment [26] - Future directions include memory compression techniques, end-to-end joint training to address the split between high-level reasoning and low-level execution, and the development of long-term video understanding [26]