Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening the coordination and integration of the "four types of supervision" to avoid fragmentation and redundancy, aiming for comprehensive and effective oversight [1] - It highlights the need for a unified leadership structure involving party committees, disciplinary inspection commissions, and relevant departments to enhance the overall effectiveness of supervision [1] - The establishment of a joint meeting system for supervision work is proposed to facilitate information sharing and resource integration among various supervisory bodies [1] Group 2 - The article discusses the establishment of a standardized supervision information management platform to enhance data sharing and real-time updates, which will improve the precision and effectiveness of supervision [2] - It suggests leveraging modern information technology for data comparison and model analysis to proactively identify anomalies and establish early warning mechanisms for potential issues [2] - The integration of findings from various supervisory types into a comprehensive report is recommended to serve as a critical reference for ongoing supervision efforts [2] Group 3 - The article advocates for a mechanism to share the results of the "four types of supervision" to ensure that oversight, rectification, and governance are interconnected, achieving a broader impact [3] - It stresses the importance of addressing identified institutional vulnerabilities and risks by improving relevant regulations and internal control mechanisms [3] - The establishment of an evaluation system for supervisory effectiveness is proposed, with strict accountability measures for inadequate responses to identified issues [3]