2025年，我从监督检查室调入审查调查室，对我来说，变换的是岗位职责，不变的是纪检监察干部的初 心使命，以及在工作中坚持实事求是原则的追求。在新的岗位上，面对新型腐败和隐性腐败案件的查办 难点，我深刻认识到，只有不断强化学习研究，探索总结新型腐败和隐性腐败的多种表现形式，深刻把 握其规律特点，不断丰富惩治方式方法，才能更好地做到精准识别、有效处理，让新型腐败和隐性腐败 无处遁形。2026年，我将持续强化理论武装、铸牢政治忠诚，以一名"新兵"的姿态学习、工作和奋斗， 不断提升履职本领，为纵深推进正风肃纪反腐添砖加瓦。 作为一名新加入派驻纪检监察机构的干部，过去一年，我持续擦亮派驻监督"探头"，围绕医保基金管理 突出问题整治工作，参与了第一次审查调查谈话、第一次外调取证，参与对全区医保领域问题线索进 行"拉网式"排查工作，监督推动职能部门追回医保基金，督促解决好群众急难愁盼问题。能为守好群众 医保"钱袋子"贡献一份力量，我感到无比欣慰与满足。新征程上，只有不断学习和总结，强化责任担 当，淬炼过硬本领，才能切实用自己的实际行动和工作成效，答好"执纪执法为民"的时代答卷。 （山东省济南市槐荫区纪委监委派驻第二纪检监察 ...

此前，该区纪委监委立足上级纪委监委加强对"一把手"监督的要求，梳理全区近年来科级干部违纪违法 典型案例，结合中原区实际，制定统筹推进政治监督的工作指引，对"一把手"及领导班子的监督提供全 面、具体、可操作的方法。 "比如，这份指引对如何开展政治谈话作出了明确规定，厘清了为何谈、谁来谈、谈什么、如何谈等具 体内容。"该区纪委常委宋二坡介绍，按照指引，在谈话前，围绕政治忠诚、权力运行、廉洁自律等维 度，对"关键少数"精准绘制"政治画像"。谈话中，直指问题、压实责任，确保达到以谈明责、以谈示 警、以谈促改的效果。（吴赛） 这是中原区纪委监委发挥派驻监督优势，监督驻在单位"三重一大"决策事项的生动实践。 近年来，中原区纪委监委把推进"一把手"和领导班子履职尽责、廉洁自律作为做实做细政治监督的重要 抓手，通过充分发挥派驻"探头"监督作用，将驻在单位"关键少数"履行管党治党政治责任、贯彻民主集 中制、是否插手干预重大事项、执行"三重一大"集体决策等情况作为监督重要内容，推动"关键少数"以 严管严治带动"绝大多数"遵规守纪，不断提升监督质效。 "领导班子履行管党治党责任是否到位、是否执行集体决策……这份《工作指引》都作了详 ...

近日，四川省成都兴城集团召开警示教育大会，成都市纪委监委驻成都兴城集团纪检监察组对该集团下 属某二级公司原董事长、总经理刘某严重违纪违法问题进行通报，教育引导党员干部以案为鉴、反躬自 省。 成都市纪委监委深化市属国企派驻机构改革，陆续向成都农商银行、成都产业集团、成都兴城集团等16 家市属国企派驻纪检监察组，健全派驻监督体制机制。刘某严重违纪违法问题就是驻成都兴城集团纪检 监察组监督发现的问题之一。 "监督发现，刘某所在公司的多个项目由同一个供应商供应材料，且刘某及其家属与该供应商存在异常 经济往来。"驻成都兴城集团纪检监察组办公室相关负责同志介绍。经分析研判，刘某涉嫌严重违纪违 法，遂及时将问题线索报市纪委监委，通过"室组地"联动，严肃查处了刘某严重违纪违法问题。最终， 刘某被开除党籍和公职，涉嫌犯罪问题移送检察机关依法审查起诉。 成都市纪委监委全面摸底市属国企经营业态、系统规模、监督对象等情况，综合考虑监督执纪工作需要 和企业长远发展，建立健全国企派驻机构组织架构、干部选任、日常监管等制度机制，合理确定各国企 派驻机构具体设置，与国企党委积极沟通，选优配强人员力量。 "我们针对市属国企二、三级企业点多、面 ...

Core Points - The emphasis on strengthening the political responsibility and supervisory responsibility of the Party is a key measure proposed by the Central Committee led by Xi Jinping to promote comprehensive and strict governance of the Party [1][2] - The role of the disciplinary inspection and supervision institutions is crucial in ensuring the implementation of these responsibilities, particularly in the context of ecological civilization construction and high-quality development [1][3] Group 1 - The supervisory responsibilities of the disciplinary inspection institutions are defined by the Party Constitution, which highlights the importance of strengthening the supervision of Party leadership and key leaders [2][3] - The establishment of a comprehensive supervisory system is essential to ensure that there are no gaps in Party supervision, with a focus on the responsibilities of the Party organizations and the supervisory institutions [3][4] Group 2 - The implementation of stationed supervision is a significant institutional arrangement for enhancing intra-Party supervision, ensuring that the responsibilities are clearly defined and effectively executed [3][5] - The need for a robust mechanism to ensure that the directives from the Central Committee regarding ecological and environmental protection are fully implemented is emphasized [5][6] Group 3 - The integration of various supervisory efforts is necessary to create a complete loop of supervision, case handling, and improvement, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of governance [4][6] - The focus on addressing corruption and improving governance through a combination of measures, including the use of big data and targeted investigations, is highlighted [6][7] Group 4 - The importance of accountability in reinforcing the awareness of responsibilities among Party members and leaders is stressed, with a focus on addressing issues such as "good personism" and formalism in supervision [7][8] - The establishment of a clear responsibility system that outlines the roles and expectations for various levels of leadership is crucial for effective governance [8][9] Group 5 - The need for a comprehensive communication mechanism to facilitate collaboration and ensure the effective implementation of responsibilities across different levels of government is emphasized [9][10] - The focus on addressing deep-rooted issues and enhancing the effectiveness of supervision through systematic approaches is critical for achieving the goals of strict governance of the Party [10]

Core Viewpoint - The Jiangsu Province Ju Rong City Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission is enhancing its supervisory mechanisms by focusing on key responsibilities, integrating resources, and improving effectiveness in oversight [1][2][3] Group 1: Supervision Mechanisms - The commission emphasizes the importance of defining responsibilities, closely monitoring key individuals and significant matters, and ensuring comprehensive accountability across all levels [1] - A leadership structure has been established to support the work of the stationed supervisory bodies, enhancing their operational capabilities [1] - A mechanism for liaison officers has been introduced to strengthen the collaboration between stationed institutions and internal disciplinary bodies, thereby improving supervisory effectiveness [1] Group 2: Supervision Models - The commission implements a "comprehensive supervision + stationed supervision + diagnostic supervision" model, ensuring full coverage of annual stationed supervision across various units [2] - Prior to stationed supervision, the supervisory teams engage with various departments to gather information on complaints and issues, ensuring a clear understanding of the situation [2] - After stationed supervision, a problem list and feedback report are generated, with strict deadlines for rectification and ongoing monitoring of compliance [2] Group 3: Integration and Collaboration - To address the challenges of dispersed supervisory forces, the commission promotes a system integration approach, enhancing collaboration among different supervisory groups [3] - The commission employs a "professional + modular" approach to integrate supervision and case handling, fostering collaboration between experienced and new personnel [3] - There is a focus on combining stationed supervision with inspection and audit supervision to enhance problem detection and resolution [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of stationed supervision as a crucial part of the party and state supervision system, highlighting its role in modernizing county governance through disciplined oversight [1][2][3] Group 1: Political Orientation - Stationed supervision is fundamentally political supervision, requiring adherence to the correct political direction to ensure the implementation of the party's policies and decisions [1] - Focus on key individuals, particularly the leadership of stationed units, to ensure accountability and responsibility through various oversight methods [1] - Emphasis on analyzing the political ecology to identify issues and responsibilities accurately [1] Group 2: System Integration - Addressing weaknesses in stationed supervision by enhancing collaboration and building an efficient supervision system [2] - Establishing a cooperative mechanism that includes various levels of oversight bodies to address issues collectively [2] - Utilizing big data to create a smart supervision platform for real-time monitoring and analysis of responsibilities [2] Group 3: Results Utilization - The effectiveness of stationed supervision is measured by the depth of problem rectification and the breadth of governance outcomes [3] - Establishing a case analysis mechanism to identify systemic flaws and ensure corrective actions are taken [3] - Regularly compiling reports on common issues to assist decision-making and improve governance [3]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of stationed supervision as a key component of the party and state supervision system, aiming to enhance governance effectiveness through institutional reforms in Henan Province's Xingyang City [1] - The reform includes optimizing the setup of 15 stationed disciplinary inspection and supervision teams based on the principle of "similar functions and related businesses," ensuring a well-rounded selection of personnel [1][2] - A comprehensive mechanism is established to enhance the responsibilities and coordination among stationed institutions, including clear duty lists for leaders and collaborative supervision methods [1][2] Group 2 - The article highlights the strengthening of disciplinary enforcement and law enforcement through collaborative mechanisms, such as regular consultations and joint case handling among stationed teams and the supervised units [2] - It discusses the integration of resources and personnel from various departments to address significant issues, exemplified by the coordinated efforts in improving elderly care services [2] - The article outlines the establishment of a joint case handling mechanism for complex cases, focusing on effective collaboration and resource allocation to enhance investigation quality [2] Group 3 - The article details initiatives to improve the quality of the stationed supervision teams through training and capacity-building activities, emphasizing political education and practical skills [3] - It mentions the implementation of various training formats, including case studies and simulations, to address weaknesses in problem handling and evidence collection [3] - The article also describes mentorship and rotation programs to foster a competitive learning environment, enhancing the teams' ability to tackle challenges effectively [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of supervisory mechanisms in enhancing the effectiveness of political and public oversight within the cultural and ideological sectors in Guangxi, China Group 1: Political Supervision - The supervisory body prioritizes the implementation of Xi Jinping's important speeches and directives as a key political task, establishing a tracking and supervision mechanism to ensure compliance with central government policies [1] - A quarterly "political health check" is conducted in seven comprehensive supervisory units to assess the implementation of responsibilities by party organizations [1] - Proactive measures include warning talks with over 20 individuals and delaying promotions for three individuals due to emerging issues [1] Group 2: Collaborative Supervision - The supervisory body addresses weaknesses in supervisory strength and professionalism by implementing a collaborative supervision mechanism, enhancing coordination among various supervisory groups [2] - Regular joint meetings are held to analyze issues and develop solutions, transforming the approach from isolated efforts to collaborative operations [2] - The "Qingfeng Village" app is utilized for real-time monitoring of cultural benefit funds, leading to the identification and rectification of 15 issues [2] Group 3: Public Supervision - A problem-oriented approach is adopted to ensure that public concerns are addressed, utilizing various channels to gather feedback on pressing issues [3] - A problem ledger is established, with clear responsibilities and deadlines for resolution, involving community representatives in evaluating the effectiveness of rectifications [3] - Specific actions taken include addressing off-campus training issues and conducting field research in rural cultural facilities to enhance resource management and utilization [3] Group 4: Digital Empowerment - The supervisory body is advancing big data supervision by developing an intelligent monitoring platform for project funding in the cultural sector, enabling online oversight of the entire process [4] - Since the platform's launch, over 50 projects have been monitored online, resulting in 12 warning alerts and the correction of 8 deviations [4] - A risk warning mechanism is established for key processes, with over 30 potential risk points identified and more than 50 preventive measures formulated [5] Group 5: Cultural Integrity - The promotion of a culture of integrity is integrated into daily supervision, focusing on the unique characteristics of cultural and ideological units [5] - Initiatives include the creation and performance of integrity-themed artistic productions, reaching over 15,000 audience members [5] - Educational efforts are made through warning sessions and case studies to enhance the awareness of discipline and regulations among staff [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of enhancing the effectiveness of stationed supervision within the party and state supervision system, focusing on targeted, collaborative, and comprehensive measures to improve the precision and efficiency of supervision [1] Group 1: Targeted Supervision - The stationed supervision acts as a "probe" to ensure political oversight is integrated throughout the power operation of the stationed units, closely aligning with the central government's decisions and responsibilities [2] - A "first agenda" supervision mechanism is established to track the implementation of significant speeches and directives from the central leadership, ensuring timely and accurate understanding [2] - A comprehensive supervision mechanism is created for major decisions, including pre-reporting, in-process supervision, and post-execution checks, focusing on the actions of key leaders and potential risks [3] Group 2: Collaborative Supervision - A collaborative and efficient supervision system is developed to address issues of fragmented efforts and enhance coordination among various supervisory bodies [4] - The establishment of a working meeting system for collaborative areas facilitates regular updates, situation analysis, and task deployment to resolve cross-departmental supervision challenges [5] - A dual-direction transfer mechanism for problem clues is implemented, allowing for timely sharing of issues identified during supervision between stationed institutions and collaborative areas [6] Group 3: Long-term Effective Supervision - The integration of punishment, treatment, and prevention is emphasized, with a focus on using case-driven reforms to enhance supervision effectiveness [7] - Warning education is highlighted as a key approach to promote integrity, utilizing various methods to educate relevant personnel about the consequences of misconduct [7] - Continuous tracking and oversight of corrective actions are mandated, with strict accountability for inadequate responses to identified issues [8]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening the "two responsibilities" framework in the transportation sector, which includes the party's leadership and the supervisory role of the disciplinary inspection teams [4][5][12] - It highlights the need for a coordinated mechanism that ensures both the party organization and the supervisory bodies work together to promote strict governance and integrity within the transportation industry [6][7][12] - The article discusses the establishment of a comprehensive supervision system that integrates various oversight functions, including disciplinary inspection, auditing, and political supervision, to enhance accountability and transparency [10][11][13] Group 2 - The article outlines the responsibilities of the party organization in leading the implementation of strict governance and the role of the supervisory teams in ensuring compliance and accountability [5][6][8] - It stresses the necessity of regular communication and collaboration between the party organization and the supervisory teams to address issues and improve governance practices [9][10] - The article calls for the development of a clear framework for addressing corruption and misconduct within the transportation sector, emphasizing the importance of preventive measures and education [8][9][12]