据东方财经，1月13日，钟薛高创始人林盛发视频表示，"关于'爱买不买'恶意剪辑的终审判决，终审法院继续维持原判，判定自媒体恶意剪辑。" 林盛称："这是终审结果，整整从2021年开始一直到现在，历时差不多5年这样的一个官司，总算在前两天画上了一个句号。'爱买不买'并不是我说的，完 全是一个流量驱动下的恶意剪辑。这件事情在去年一审被确认，前两天终审做了一个最终的确认。" 据媒体报道，2018年网传视频中林盛"钟薛高66元雪糕爱要不要"的争议言论，实为林盛转述供应商对高价原料的态度。 在完整采访视频中，日本供应商对定价120万元/吨的柚子原料声称"就这么贵，你爱要不要"，林盛在复述这段话时，被涉案自媒体剪辑扭曲为针对消费者 的傲慢表态。 2025年，北京互联网法院一审判决认定该剪辑构成名誉侵权，被告需赔偿230万元并公开道歉。 2025年7月16日，天眼查显示，钟薛高食品（上海）有限公司新增一则破产审查信息，申请人为上海臻料贸易有限公司，经办法院为上海市第三中级人民 法院。 | 案号 | (2025) 沪03破申753号 | 案件类型 | 破产审查案件 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 被 ...

Core Viewpoint - BreadTalk, once a popular brand known for its bakery products, is facing significant operational challenges in Chengdu, leading to the closure of all its stores in the area and issues regarding the refund of stored value cards for consumers [2][3][6]. Group 1: Company Background - BreadTalk was founded in 2000 by Singaporean Guo Mingzhong and has expanded its operations to various countries including China, Indonesia, the Philippines, Kuwait, and Malaysia, receiving widespread acclaim [1]. - The company operates a franchise model, with a focus on direct management in first-tier cities and franchising in lower-tier cities, requiring an estimated startup capital of approximately 2 million yuan for franchisees [6]. Group 2: Operational Issues in Chengdu - Since early July, consumers in Chengdu have reported difficulties in obtaining refunds for stored value cards after the company announced plans to upgrade its stores without prior notice [2][3]. - All BreadTalk stores in Chengdu have closed, and the company has been accused of complicating the refund process by requiring proof of payment for card purchases, which has frustrated consumers [3][6]. Group 3: Regulatory Response - The Chengdu Qingyang District Urban Operation and Government Service Management Office has acknowledged the complaints and stated that they will provide a detailed response within 15 working days [4]. Group 4: Financial and Legal Challenges - Sichuan Xinyu Catering Management Co., which operates BreadTalk in the region, has faced legal issues, including restrictions on high consumption due to loan disputes, impacting its operational status [8]. - The company has previously exited the Xi'an market due to poor operational conditions and contractual disputes with franchisees [10].