Core Viewpoint - Li Ka-shing, chairman of Henderson Land Development, has filed a lawsuit against actress Zhou Xun and several social media accounts, claiming they have spread false rumors about him for nearly a decade [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Action - Li Ka-shing believes that Zhou Xun is the source of false rumors and discussions regarding their relationship, which he asserts are untrue [2]. - He has emphasized that he has no relationship with Zhou Xun and has never intended to know her [3]. - The lawsuit aims to clarify the facts and protect his personal and family reputation [7]. Group 2: Impact of Rumors - Li Ka-shing has stated that the false reports have caused significant pressure on his family and have affected their social reputation [5]. - He has remained silent on the matter for nearly ten years, but believes that this silence has allowed malicious individuals to escalate the situation [5]. Group 3: Background Information - Zhou Xun, born in 1985, gained fame through modeling and acting, and has received nominations for film awards [7]. - Li Ka-shing, born in 1971, is a well-known entrepreneur in Hong Kong and the son of the late Li Ka-shing, founder of Henderson Land Development [7]. - The company has seen a significant increase in stock price, rising over 40%, as it actively pursues new projects, including the $8.1 billion "Central Plaza" office and retail complex [10].

Core Viewpoint - Mr. Li Ka-shing has taken legal action against actress Chrissie Chau for defamation and harassment due to false rumors linking them, asserting that he has no relationship with her and believes she is the source of these rumors for personal publicity [2][5][15]. Group 1: Legal Action and Allegations - Mr. Li has filed a lawsuit in the Hong Kong High Court against Chrissie Chau and five social media channels for defamation and harassment, aiming to clarify facts and protect his family's reputation [2][12]. - The lawsuit is based on allegations that Chau has been spreading false rumors about a relationship with Mr. Li, which he claims has been ongoing for nearly a decade [15][17]. - Mr. Li believes that Chau's actions are motivated by a desire to increase her personal exposure and promote her film projects, particularly during a difficult time for his family following the death of his father [5][16]. Group 2: Financial Background - Mr. Li Ka-shing is the son of the late Li Shau-kee, founder of Henderson Land Development Company, and currently serves as the chairman and managing director of the company alongside his brother [8][12]. - According to the latest Forbes list, the Li brothers rank second among Hong Kong's wealthiest individuals, with a shared net worth of $34.9 billion (approximately 241.1 billion RMB) [12]. - Since 2025, Henderson Land's stock price has increased by 48.6%, currently trading at HKD 32.4 per share, with a total market capitalization of HKD 156.9 billion [12].

据看看新闻报道，2月13日香港富豪李家诚采取法律行动，前往香港高等法院向艺人周秀娜及5个网络社交媒体频道作出提告。 李家诚以个人名义发声明称，他控告周秀娜诽谤及骚扰，因她引发虚假传闻，并强调绝不认识周秀娜小姐，与她绝无任何关系，也没有任何企图或意图认 识她。 同时，李家诚控告5个网络社交媒体频道诽谤及骚扰，望停止不可助长的网络欺凌文化。他表示会采取法律行动，以厘清事实及保护个人及家族名誉。 声明提到，2025年6月，周秀娜在宣传其新电影作品期间接受访问时，预先沟通要谈论她被包养的传闻，她的言论引发网络上捏造李先生与周秀娜小姐虚 构关系的大量讨论及视频。尽管李先生及其家人正在面对失去父亲李兆基博士的悲痛，周秀娜小姐自私地为了达到其个人宣传目的，明知他们正处于这个 艰难时刻，仍然选择重提虚构传闻，令他们又一次要面对这些夸张失实、不合法、不合理及不负责任的网络欺凌，犹如在李先生及其家人的"伤口上洒 盐"。 去年周秀娜在一档访谈节目中公开表示与李家诚从未有过任何接触，谣言完全是空穴来风。她还解释称多年未曾回应这些传闻，是因为自己一直抱有"清 者自清"的态度，选择默默忍受这些不实言论，认为这样才是最好的处理方式。 李家 ...

转自：中国反邪教 【#网络欺凌更隐蔽更持续#】#参与网络欺凌群体已下沉至初中以下年龄段# 业内人士表示，相较于早 期以直白辱骂、情绪宣泄为主要特征的网络欺凌，现如今对未成年人的网络欺凌正朝着更隐蔽、更持 续、更具扩散性的方向发展，一旦发生，很难被快速遏制。实际上，一些网络欺凌已经披上了网络文化 的外衣，通过恶俗玩梗、伤痛娱乐化、制作表情包等方式弱化攻击性，但对当事人造成的是更长期、更 反复的伤害。另据观察，参与网络欺凌的群体，已经明显向初中甚至更低年龄阶段下沉。（央视网） （来源：中国反邪教） ...

转自：央视新闻客户端 不少学校都有"校园表白墙"，它并不是一堵物理意义上的墙，而是由学生或是校外人士运营的非官方社交账号，为在校学生提供情感表达、信息交流和生活 服务等。然而，原本用于倾诉心事、分享日常的网络空间在某些时刻却成了散播谣言、滋生恶意的隐秘角落。一句看似玩笑的"网络梗"、一个恶意加工的表 情包、一次藏在屏幕背后的匿名诽谤……都可能成为刺向未成年人的利刃，严重的甚至会发展成为网络欺凌，给本该无忧无虑的年纪蒙上一层挥之不去的阴 影。 事实上，当前网络欺凌正在以更复杂、更隐蔽、更持续的方式侵入未成年人的社交与生活。当欺凌戴上"网络面具"，如何守护未成年人的心灵防线和成长空 间？ "校园表白墙" 成网络欺凌高发载体 这几天，北京青少年法律援助与研究中心网络保护部负责人陈强正在跟进一则来自一个13岁女孩父亲的求助——患抑郁症的女儿因网络欺凌病情加重，不得 不休学在家。 北京青少年法律援助与研究中心网络保护部负责人 陈强：家长说孩子有一些抑郁症的表现，可能在班级中有的同学会觉得她比较特殊，好几个同学在某一 个短视频平台上连续发布了多篇短视频。短视频内容明显指向这个同学，比如可能映射她家庭或者在学校的一些行为等 ...

央广网北京1月24日消息（总台中国之声记者谭瑱）据中央广播电视总台中国之声《新闻纵横》报 道，不少学校都有"校园表白墙"，它并不是一堵物理意义上的墙，而是由学生或是校外人士运营的非官 方社交账号，为在校学生提供情感表达、信息交流和生活服务等功能。 然而，原本用于倾诉心事、分享日常的网络空间，在某些时刻却成了散播谣言、滋生恶意的隐秘角 落，严重的则发展成为网络欺凌，给本该无忧无虑的年纪蒙上了一层挥之不去的阴影。 事实上，网络欺凌正在以更复杂、更隐蔽、更持续的方式，侵入未成年人的社交与生活。一句看似 玩笑的"网络梗"，一个恶意加工的表情包，一次藏在屏幕背后的匿名诽谤，都可能成为刺向未成年人的 利刃。当欺凌戴上"网络面具"，如何护住未成年人的心灵防线和成长空间？ 这几天，北京青少年法律援助与研究中心网络保护部负责人陈强，正在跟进一则来自一个13岁女孩 父亲的求助——患抑郁症的女儿因网络欺凌病情加重，不得不休学在家。 陈强介绍："前几天我们接到一个咨询，家长说孩子有一些抑郁症的表现，可能在班级有的同学觉 得她比较特殊，好几个同学就在某短视频平台上连续发布了多条短视频，短视频内容其实就是明显指向 这个同学的，比如可能映 ...

Core Viewpoint - The newly revised "Public Security Administration Punishment Law" in China, effective from January 1, 2026, incorporates school bullying into the realm of public security management, defining bullying behaviors, increasing penalties, and reinforcing school responsibilities [1][2]. Summary by Relevant Sections Legal Framework - The new law explicitly categorizes severe school bullying as a violation of public security, mandating police intervention and corrective education measures for offenders [1][2]. - It broadens the scope of administrative detention for minors aged 14 to 18, allowing for detention in cases of severe violations of public security management [2]. Enforcement Challenges - Despite the law's advancements, challenges remain in enforcement, particularly in defining bullying behaviors and establishing evidence standards for non-physical forms of bullying, such as psychological harm and cyberbullying [4][5]. - The law aims to create a comprehensive three-tiered response system for misconduct, illegal acts, and criminal behavior, addressing previous legal gaps [2]. Distinction and Evidence Collection - The law provides a basis for defining bullying, but practical challenges persist in distinguishing between bullying and minor altercations, as well as in assessing the severity of insults and threats [5][6]. - Evidence collection remains a significant hurdle, especially for covert forms of bullying, necessitating the establishment of standardized reporting and investigation mechanisms [5][6]. Cyberbullying - The law addresses the regulatory gap concerning cyberbullying, extending its jurisdiction to online platforms where bullying behaviors occur, thus recognizing the unique challenges posed by digital environments [8][9]. - Cyberbullying is noted for its potential to cause profound and lasting psychological harm to victims, highlighting the need for effective monitoring and intervention strategies [8][9]. Psychological Impact - The long-term psychological effects of bullying on minors are emphasized, with a focus on the systemic destruction of self-identity rather than just visible physical harm [9].

Core Viewpoint - The newly revised "Public Security Administration Punishment Law" in China, effective from January 1, 2026, incorporates school bullying into the realm of public security management, defining bullying behaviors, increasing penalties, and reinforcing school responsibilities [1][2]. Summary by Relevant Sections Legal Framework - The new law explicitly categorizes severe school bullying as a violation of public security, mandating police intervention and corrective education measures for offenders [1][2]. - It broadens the scope of administrative detention for minors aged 14 to 18, allowing for detention in cases of severe violations of public security management [2]. Definition and Challenges - "School bullying" is defined as actions by one or more students that exploit power imbalances to inflict malicious harm on a targeted student, causing physical or psychological damage [1]. - Despite the law's advancements, challenges remain in law enforcement, particularly in defining bullying behaviors and gathering evidence, especially for psychological and online bullying [4][5]. Enforcement and Implementation - The law establishes a three-tiered response system for handling misconduct, illegal actions, and criminal behavior, filling existing legal gaps [2]. - There is a need for standardized criteria for identifying "serious bullying" and effective evidence collection methods for non-physical forms of bullying [2][4]. Online Bullying - The law addresses online bullying, recognizing that such behaviors can occur in digital spaces and have severe, lasting impacts on victims [7][8]. - The law provides administrative sanctions for severe online bullying behaviors that do not yet constitute criminal acts, enhancing the legal framework for addressing these issues [8]. Psychological Impact - The long-term psychological effects of bullying on minors are highlighted, emphasizing the need for early identification and intervention mechanisms within schools [6][8]. - The law aims to protect minors' privacy and ensure corrective measures are effective in helping students return to normalcy [2][5].

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the urgent need for enhanced online protection for minors, emphasizing the responsibility of internet platforms to prevent and address online bullying and harmful content targeting minors [1][6][11]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A high school student, Xiaohua, became a victim of online bullying when a classmate, Xiaoli, created and shared a derogatory video featuring Xiaohua's image and personal information on a social media app [2][4]. - The video quickly gained significant attention, accumulating over 35,000 views within a day, leading to severe emotional distress for Xiaohua [5][7]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Xiaohua's father filed a lawsuit against the app's operator, arguing that the platform failed to fulfill its duty to monitor and remove harmful content promptly [5][6]. - The Beijing Internet Court ruled that the platform had a higher obligation to review content involving minors and should bear joint responsibility for the infringement due to its delayed response [6][8]. Group 3: Court's Rationale - The court determined that the platform should have recognized the potential harm of the video, given its clear depiction of a minor and the explicit nature of the content [7][9]. - The ruling emphasized that the platform's failure to implement adequate monitoring and preventive measures constituted a breach of its responsibilities under relevant laws, including the Minor Protection Law [10][12]. Group 4: Implications for the Industry - The case serves as a judicial precedent, urging internet platforms to strengthen their content management systems and take proactive measures to protect minors from online harassment [8][11]. - Experts advocate for a collaborative approach involving various stakeholders to enhance the protective framework for minors in the digital space, ensuring a safer online environment [11][12].

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court released a report detailing the juvenile trial work from 1978 to 2024, highlighting the significant issue of minors being exposed to harmful online content [1] - The report indicates that the number of civil disputes involving minors' online rights is increasing, with a notable rise in cases related to in-game purchases and online tipping [4] - The implementation of the "Regulations on the Protection of Minors in Cyberspace" on January 1, 2024, aims to create a healthier online environment for minors by defining responsibilities for various stakeholders [2][4] Group 2 - The report emphasizes the need for a multi-faceted approach to ensure minors can navigate the internet safely and healthily, involving cooperation from families, schools, and the government [3][12] - There is a growing concern regarding the impact of internet culture on minors' values and the psychological effects of internet addiction, including risks of fraud and bullying [2][5] - The report notes that many minors are circumventing existing anti-addiction systems by using others' identities to access online games, indicating a gap in enforcement and parental guidance [8][9][10] Group 3 - The rise in online gaming and streaming has led to a significant increase in minors' online activity, with a reported 1.96 billion minor internet users in China, achieving a penetration rate of 97.3% [1] - The report highlights that the financial stakes in disputes involving minors can be substantial, with some cases exceeding 3 million yuan, far above typical spending levels for minors [4] - The need for improved online safety measures is underscored, as many platforms prioritize economic gain over the protection of minors, leading to a proliferation of harmful content [7][12]