Core Viewpoint - The Supreme Court's new regulations expand the jurisdiction of internet courts to include four new categories of online cases, enhancing the judicial efficiency and governance of the digital space [1][3]. Group 1: New Jurisdiction Categories - The new regulations introduce four categories of cases under the jurisdiction of internet courts: "network data ownership, infringement, and contract disputes," "network personal information protection and privacy disputes," "network virtual property ownership, infringement, and contract disputes," and "network unfair competition disputes" [1][3]. - Traditional online infringement disputes, such as financial loan contract disputes and copyright ownership disputes, will no longer fall under the jurisdiction of internet courts but will be handled by local grassroots courts [1][3]. Group 2: Judicial Adaptation and Innovation - The establishment of internet courts represents a significant institutional innovation to adapt the judiciary to the trends of internet development, with the first internet court established in Hangzhou in August 2017, followed by others in Beijing and Guangzhou [1][2]. - The core function of internet courts has evolved from "innovating trial mechanisms" to "outputting rules for internet governance," indicating a shift towards more comprehensive legal frameworks for new types of online disputes [2]. Group 3: Impact on Litigation Experience - The adjustment in jurisdiction is expected to enhance the litigation experience for parties involved, improving the quality and efficiency of case handling through optimized trial mechanisms [4]. - The three cities hosting internet courts—Beijing, Hangzhou, and Guangzhou—are key hubs for digital economic innovation, making them focal points for complex online disputes [4][5]. Group 4: Challenges and Professional Requirements - There are existing challenges in judicial practice regarding the clarity of adjudication standards and legal applications for new types of cases, particularly those related to data rights and unfair competition [2]. - Cases involving artificial intelligence present high technical barriers and complexities, necessitating a high level of judicial expertise to ensure accurate fact-finding and legal interpretation [4][5].

（原标题：穿直播带货，"嘎子哥"被行拘！） 来源：央视新闻微信公众号 经查，谢某某（男，36岁，河北雄县人）在拍摄电影休息期间，身着带有明显警用标志的服装直播带 货，造成不良社会影响。根据《中华人民共和国人民警察法》第三十六条规定，依法对谢某某处以行政 拘留7日。 演员"嘎子哥"谢某某在9月10日的网络直播中穿带货并骂人一事持续引发关注。今日（17日），云南临 沧市耿马傣族佤族自治县公安局发布警情通报，通报内容如下： 警方提示：人民警察的警用标志、制式服装、警械、证件为人民警察专用，其他个人和组织不得持有和 使用。网络空间不是"法外之地"，请广大网民文明上网、依法上网，共建清朗网络空间。 近日，接群众举报称："有人穿直播带货，请警方调查处理"。接报后，公安机关迅速开展调查工作。 ...

云南临沧市耿马傣族佤族自治县公安局今日发布警情通报，通报内容如下： 近日，接群众举报称："有人穿警服直播带货，请警方调查处理"。接报后，公安机关迅速开展调查 工作。 经查，谢某某（男，36岁，河北雄县人）在拍摄电影休息期间，身着带有明显警用标志的服装直播 带货，造成不良社会影响。根据《中华人民共和国人民警察法》第三十六条规定，依法对谢某某处以 行政拘留7日。 警方提示：人民警察的警用标志、制式服装、警械、证件为人民警察专用，其他个人和组织不得持有 和使用。网络空间不是"法外之地"，请广大网民文明上网、依法上网，共建清朗网络空间。 微信编辑：夏木 ...

Core Viewpoint - Zhejiang Province is intensifying efforts to combat online behaviors that infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises, focusing on eliminating "black mouths" and "black public relations" as part of its legal governance of cyberspace [1][2] Group 1: Governance Actions - Zhejiang has closed a number of accounts that infringe on the rights of enterprises and entrepreneurs, including WeChat and Weibo accounts that disseminated negative and false information about Zhejiang enterprises [2] - The province has actively streamlined reporting channels for online infringement and counterfeit information, resulting in the removal of over 4,200 pieces of infringing information and the closure of more than 300 accounts [2] Group 2: Support for Enterprises - Zhejiang is focusing on optimizing support measures for enterprises, conducting over 350 administrative guidance sessions to help businesses understand network policies and regulations [2] - The province has implemented tailored strategies for individual enterprises and provided compliance tips to assist in improving internal management systems [2]