Workflow
美联储主席换届影响
icon
Search documents
惊人相似!40年前历史正重现,1987美国股灾“黑色星期一”将卷土重来?
美股研究社· 2025-08-21 11:09
Core Viewpoint - The article draws parallels between the current economic situation and historical events from 40 years ago, particularly focusing on the potential for a repeat of the "Black Monday" stock market crash due to the depreciation of the US dollar and changes in Federal Reserve leadership [2][6]. Group 1: Historical Context - The US dollar has depreciated nearly 10% this year, reaching a three-year low against major currencies, coinciding with Trump's return to the White House [2]. - Following the 1985 Plaza Accord, the US experienced a similar scenario where the dollar fell sharply while the stock market surged, with the S&P and Nasdaq reaching new highs [5]. - After the Plaza Accord, the dollar fell 36.5% against the yen and 30.8% to 36.6% against other major European currencies over 17 months, yet the US stock market continued to rise [5][10]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The article highlights that despite the dollar's decline, US import prices did not significantly rise due to exporters, including Japan, compressing profit margins to maintain market share [10]. - The decline in oil prices further alleviated inflationary pressures, allowing the Dow Jones Industrial Average to reach historical highs during this period [10]. Group 3: Federal Reserve Leadership - The confidence in the market during the 1985-1987 period was largely attributed to the credibility of then-Fed Chairman Paul Volcker, who had successfully controlled inflation previously [12]. - The transition to Alan Greenspan in 1987 saw a lack of decisive action when the dollar fell below critical levels, leading to a loss of market confidence and contributing to the "Black Monday" crash [15]. Group 4: Implications for Today - The article suggests that if Volcker had remained in charge during the critical moments of 1987, he would likely have taken measures to stabilize the dollar and prevent the ensuing market turmoil [17]. - The analysis emphasizes the importance of the central bank's leadership and credibility in maintaining market stability, particularly in times of economic uncertainty [17].
野村:惊人相似?“广场协议”后“美元下跌,股市火爆”,接着新美联储主席上任,然后是“黑色星期一”
美股IPO· 2025-08-20 04:29
Core Viewpoint - The article draws parallels between the current economic situation and the events surrounding the Plaza Accord in 1985, suggesting that the conditions leading to a potential market crash, similar to "Black Monday" in 1987, are re-emerging today [3][5][11]. Group 1: Historical Context - The Plaza Accord initiated a period of significant dollar depreciation while the U.S. stock market reached new highs, a phenomenon that is being observed again in the current market [4][5]. - Following the Plaza Accord, the dollar depreciated by 36.5% against the yen and 30.8% to 36.6% against major European currencies within 17 months, yet the U.S. stock market continued to rise [4][7]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The apparent contradiction of a declining dollar alongside a booming stock market was largely supported by the market's belief that inflation was under control, bolstered by the reputation of then-Fed Chairman Paul Volcker [5][9]. - Despite global economic uncertainties due to currency fluctuations, the Dow Jones Industrial Average consistently set historical highs during this period [8]. Group 3: Leadership and Policy Response - Volcker's credibility played a crucial role in maintaining market confidence; his decisive actions against inflation reassured investors [9][11]. - The transition to Alan Greenspan as Fed Chairman in 1987 marked a critical turning point, as his inaction during a significant dollar drop led to renewed investor panic and ultimately contributed to the market crash [10][11]. Group 4: Implications for Current Market - The article posits that if Volcker had remained in charge, the "Black Monday" crash might have been averted due to his proactive stance on monetary policy [11]. - The current situation raises questions about the Fed's leadership and its potential impact on market stability, echoing the historical lessons from the 1980s [5][11].