Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve's "third mission" of pursuing moderate long-term interest rates has gained attention, especially after new board member Stephen Milan's dissenting vote against a 25 basis point rate cut, advocating instead for a 50 basis point cut, indicating potential political influence from the White House [1][2][3]. Group 1: Federal Reserve's Rate Decisions - On September 17, the Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point cut in the federal funds rate target range to 4.00% to 4.25%, marking the first rate cut of 2025 and following three cuts in 2024 [1]. - Milan's dissenting vote highlights a significant internal division within the Federal Reserve, with 11 votes in favor of the rate cut and 1 against, suggesting a strong consensus despite political pressures [2][4]. - The dot plot revealed a notable divergence in opinions among the 19 voting members regarding future rate cuts, indicating a lack of consensus on the pace of monetary easing [5]. Group 2: Economic Forecasts and Implications - The Federal Reserve slightly raised its GDP growth forecast for 2025 from 1.4% to 1.6%, while maintaining its predictions for unemployment and inflation for 2024 [5]. - For 2026, the Fed's outlook suggests higher growth, lower unemployment, and higher inflation, with the terminal rate projected to decrease to 3.4% from 3.6% [5]. - The current economic data indicates a shift in the Fed's focus towards stabilizing the labor market, with a cautious approach to future rate cuts [7][8]. Group 3: Market Reactions and Investment Opportunities - The anticipated continuation of rate cuts may lead to a revaluation of global assets, benefiting physical assets and precious metals, such as energy, metals, real estate, and gold [6]. - A weaker dollar could accelerate capital flows into emerging markets, particularly those benefiting from manufacturing shifts and resource exports [6]. - The Fed's cautious stance on rate cuts reflects a balancing act between achieving its dual mandate of maximum employment and price stability while navigating political pressures [8][9].