来源：证券时报e公司 《公司法》规定，股东有权查阅公司章程、股东名册。2024年7月1日，新《公司法》实施后，股东可进 一步复制股东资料。 由于上市公司股票在二级市场流通的特殊性，一些受访人士认为，股东名册属于"敏感信息"，其查阅和 复制涉及多方利益，相关方对股东获取上市公司股东名册的行为，应予以适当的规范和限制。 截至目前，A股只有极少数上市公司出台了《股东名册查阅制度》。对于如何在保障股东权利的同时， 约束其行为，并保证公司的日常运营不受影响，市场或许还需要做一些工作。 牛散与律师起争议 日前，一位小红书博主发文称，其在行使股东权利查阅上市公司股东名册时，遭到上市公司所聘请律师 的"辱骂"，该博主称要"坚决投诉"。 配图显示，该博主向*ST立航发送了查阅股东名册的邮件，要求查阅公司最新一期前50名股东的名单； 其在邮件中附上了自己的身份证和沪市股东卡。 综合多方信息，该博主系知名牛散谢恺。 股东查阅权标准不一 《公司法》中一直有规定：（股份有限公司的）股东有权查阅公司章程、股东名册。 公开资料显示，谢恺出生于1988年，上海黄浦区人士。有报道称，他以6000元起家，逐步成为了身家过 亿元的A股超级牛散。谢 ...

公开资料显示，谢恺出生于1988年，上海黄浦区人士。有报道称，他以6000元起家，逐步成为了身家过 亿元的A股超级牛散。谢恺近几年频频现身资本市场，其成名作是押中"10倍股"朗姿股份（002612）。 截至目前，A股只有极少数上市公司出台了《股东名册查阅制度》。对于如何在保障股东权利的同时， 约束其行为，并保证公司的日常运营不受影响，市场或许还需要做一些工作。 牛散与律师起争议 日前，一位小红书博主发文称，其在行使股东权利查阅上市公司股东名册时，遭到上市公司所聘请律师 的"辱骂"，该博主称要"坚决投诉"。 配图显示，该博主向*ST立航（603261）发送了查阅股东名册的邮件，要求查阅公司最新一期前50名股 东的名单；其在邮件中附上了自己的身份证和沪市股东卡。 《公司法》规定，股东有权查阅公司章程、股东名册。2024年7月1日，新《公司法》实施后，股东可进 一步复制股东资料。 综合多方信息，该博主系知名牛散谢恺。 由于上市公司股票在二级市场流通的特殊性，一些受访人士认为，股东名册属于"敏感信息"，其查阅和 复制涉及多方利益，相关方对股东获取上市公司股东名册的行为，应予以适当的规范和限制。 截至2025年上半年末 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a dispute between shareholders and the company Junjiu Electronics Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., particularly focusing on the issue of shareholder rights to information and deeper underlying conflicts between shareholders and the company [3][4][6]. Group 1: Shareholder Disputes - The main shareholder involved in the dispute is Kaifeng Venture Capital, which holds a 6.56% stake in Junjiu [3]. - Kaifeng has initiated legal action against the company, claiming infringement of shareholder rights to information, while the company is also involved in a labor contract dispute with a key shareholder, Jin Ye [4][6]. - The situation is complicated by the fact that Jin Ye, who has been with the company since its inception in 2016, is also a significant shareholder [4]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Implications - Kaifeng's legal actions appear to be more than just a simple request for information, as they have requested a special audit shortly after a new investment round was completed [6][7]. - The company's compliance with shareholder information rights has been called into question, particularly given the timing of Kaifeng's demands and subsequent legal actions [6][7]. - An internal letter from the company suggests that Kaifeng's actions are specifically targeting the company and one founding shareholder, rather than the entire founding team, indicating potential deeper conflicts [7][11]. Group 3: Underlying Relationships - There is mention of a "secret agreement" between Jin Ye and Kaifeng, which raises questions about the nature of their relationship and potential undisclosed interests [11]. - The article hints at a complex web of relationships and conflicts among the company's shareholders, suggesting that the situation may involve undisclosed financial or strategic interests [11][12]. - The author calls for more media attention to uncover the truth behind the shareholder and company conflicts, indicating that this may not be the last article on the subject [12][13].