Group 1 - The article discusses the current state of the US-China rivalry, highlighting that while both nations engage in intense competition, other countries remain silent and passive, indicating a lack of influence in the ongoing conflict [1][4][7] - It notes that the US has raised tariffs on China to over 50%, but both sides have shown restraint, maintaining tariffs around 10% to avoid severe economic repercussions [5][6] - The article emphasizes that the competition revolves around trade rules, technological dominance, and resource control, with both nations carefully managing the crisis to avoid total breakdown [6][10] Group 2 - The impact of the US-China rivalry on third-party countries is significant, as they suffer from reduced competitiveness and market access due to the tariffs imposed by both superpowers [9][12] - South Korea is highlighted as a case study, attempting to align with the US while still needing to maintain ties with China, resulting in a precarious position that has led to a decline in its semiconductor exports [12][13] - The article concludes that the silence of other nations stems from their realization of their limited power in the geopolitical landscape, with many caught between the competing interests of the US and China [15][17]