Core Viewpoint - On October 18, a fire incident occurred on China International Airlines flight CA139 from Hangzhou to Incheon, South Korea, caused by a lithium battery in a passenger's carry-on luggage, leading to an emergency landing in Shanghai [5][6]. Incident Summary - The flight took off around 9 AM and shortly after, a loud noise was heard, followed by smoke filling the cabin due to the fire from the overhead luggage compartment [2]. - The airline confirmed that the crew followed emergency procedures, and there were no injuries reported among passengers [5][6]. Regulatory Context - As of June 28, the Civil Aviation Administration of China has prohibited passengers from carrying power banks without 3C certification or those that have been recalled on domestic flights [9]. - Lithium battery products are strictly forbidden from being checked in; if carried on, the rated energy must not exceed 100Wh, with specific conditions for batteries exceeding this limit [9].

【#杭州飞首尔航班锂电池自燃#】#杭州飞首尔航班行李架起火#2025年10月18日中午，有网友报料，一 趟计划从杭州飞往韩国首尔的航班，备降上海浦东机场。记者查询"飞常准"APP看到，这趟国航CA139 航班，今天于9时47分从杭州萧山国际机场起飞，计划当地时间15时抵达首尔仁川机场，显示航班于11 时07分备降至上海浦东。"本来还在飞机上啃面包，突然'砰'一声就看到前面行李架火冒出来了。"搭乘 该趟航班的网友发帖称，当时，整个客舱都是烟，行李架都熏黑了。刚刚，中国国际航空发布官方声 明：10月18日，由杭州飞往仁川的CA139航班，一名旅客存放在行李架上手提行李内锂电池自燃，机组 按程序立即处置，未出现人员受伤。为确保飞行安全，飞机已备降上海浦东机场。国航已调配飞机继续 执行该航班任务。根据民航局最新要求，自今年6月28日起禁止旅客携带没有3C标识、3C标识不清晰、 已被召回型号或批次的充电宝乘坐境内航班。根据民航局规定，锂电池产品严禁托运。如随身携带，额 定能量不能超过100Wh；假如超过100Wh但不超过160Wh，经航空公司批准后方可携带，但不得超过两 个。如大于160Wh，严禁带上飞机。此外，乘机人 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a significant operational error by China Eastern Airlines (CEA) during a peak travel period, which resulted in a flight returning to its departure airport due to a maintenance oversight regarding the landing gear safety pin [2][5][6]. Group 1: Incident Details - On July 20, CEA's MU735 flight from Shanghai to Sydney experienced a delay of nearly 4 hours after returning to Shanghai due to circling over the East China Sea and subsequently landing back at Pudong Airport [2][5]. - The flight, which covers a distance of approximately 7,879 kilometers, typically has a flight duration of around 10 hours and 20 minutes [2]. - The incident was attributed to a failure to remove the landing gear safety pin, a critical safety measure before takeoff [5][6]. Group 2: Safety Protocols - The landing gear safety pin is an essential safety device that prevents the landing gear from retracting unexpectedly during flight, similar to a handbrake in a car [7]. - CEA's maintenance protocols include a pre-flight checklist that mandates the removal of the landing gear safety pin, tire pressure checks, and other safety inspections [7]. - The oversight in this incident could lead to severe consequences for the responsible maintenance personnel, as safety is a non-negotiable aspect of aviation operations [6]. Group 3: Industry Context - The incident occurred during the busy summer travel season, a critical period for airlines, which often leads to increased operational pressures and potential for errors [9][10]. - CEA has been actively increasing its flight capacity during this peak season, with plans to operate over 3,200 flights daily, reflecting a 5% increase compared to the previous year [9][10]. - The airline has also announced the opening of 38 new domestic routes and additional international flights to meet rising travel demand [10]. Group 4: Financial Outlook - CEA has projected a significant financial loss for the first half of 2025, estimating losses between 1.2 billion to 1.6 billion yuan [11].

Core Points - On July 20, China Eastern Airlines flight MU735 returned to Shanghai due to a maintenance issue related to the landing gear pin not being removed, leading to fuel dumping [2][5] - The flight, operated by an Airbus A350-900, circled over the Yangtze River estuary before returning to Pudong Airport after approximately 3 hours and 33 minutes of delay [5][6] - The airline arranged for passengers to take a subsequent flight to Sydney after the incident [5] Industry Insights - The landing gear pin is a critical item in pre-flight checks; if not removed, it can prevent the landing gear from retracting, potentially triggering instrument system alarms [5] - For the Shanghai to Sydney route, the Airbus A350-900 requires approximately 90 tons of fuel, considering aircraft performance, distance, fuel efficiency, and safety regulations [6] - The estimated fuel cost for the fuel dumped during the return flight is around 250,000 RMB, in addition to airport service fees and compensation for flight delays, indicating significant direct economic losses [7]

Core Points - Southern Airlines flight CZ0333 from Guangzhou to Doha made an emergency landing in Muscat, Oman due to a "public safety" incident that could affect flight safety [2] - The flight took off at 19:49 on June 23 and landed in Muscat at around midnight, before arriving in Doha at 5:58 local time on June 24, resulting in a total delay of approximately 7 hours [2] - The Chinese Embassy in Qatar had previously issued warnings regarding flight changes and cancellations due to the closure of airspace in the region amid escalating tensions [3] Summary by Sections Flight Incident - Southern Airlines flight CZ0333 experienced a safety-related incident, leading to an emergency landing in Muscat [2] - The flight was delayed for about 7 hours before reaching its final destination in Doha [2] Regional Tensions - The Chinese Embassy in Qatar alerted citizens about the heightened tensions in the Middle East and the potential for flight disruptions [3] - Travelers were advised to monitor flight changes and adjust their travel plans accordingly [3]