每经编辑｜何小桃 据红星新闻报道，9月20日，记者从"朋友圈诽谤局长被行拘"事件当事人高光华及其代理律师张具堆处获悉，元江县公安局已作出撤销行政处罚决定书， 撤销此前对高光华的行政处罚。 元江县公安局今日作出的元公撤行处决字（2025）1号撤销行政处罚决定书显示，该局澧江派出所办理的高光华涉嫌诽谤他人案，经调查存在程序违法， 处罚不当，该局决定撤销相关行政处罚决定。 高光华告诉记者，因针对他的行政处罚决定书撤销，他亦撤回行政复议申请。银行信息显示，同日，高光华还收到了1902.08元的国家赔偿。高光华称， 相关人士当面向自己道歉，他已接受道歉。 另据智通财经报道，高光华称，"元江县公安局一副局长当面向我道歉了，并称会调查办案的相关人员。"谈及行政处罚被撤销一事，他坦言，自己内心五 味杂陈，当时朋友圈所发内容措辞过于绝对。 他透露，这段时间以来，自己背负着沉重的心理压力，工作与个人生活均受到了不小的冲击，"警方既然撤销了处罚，说明我的行为并不构成违法，已建 议他们以后办理此类案件要慎重。" 行政赔偿决定书称，元江县公安局经审理查明：高光华在其微信朋友圈发布不属实信息，并对他人造成影响的违法行为属实，但其主动到案 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has released five typical cases involving administrative enforcement against enterprises, demonstrating its commitment to supervising and correcting illegal administrative enforcement actions to protect the legitimate rights and interests of business entities [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Enforcement Cases - The administrative authorities are required to perform regulatory duties such as administrative enforcement within the legal framework, including defined powers, scope, conditions, and procedures [1]. - In a specific case, a rafting company operating in Qiqihar, Heilongjiang Province, had its five rafting boats seized by the local cultural and tourism bureau due to a lack of registration, and the boats were not returned until April 2022 [1][2]. - The court ruled that the local bureau's seizure of the rafting boats was illegal, as the relevant regulations did not authorize such actions for unregistered entities, and ordered the return of the boats along with compensation for the losses incurred [2]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Court's Role - From 2022 to 2024, approximately 8% of first-instance administrative cases accepted by various levels of people's courts involved administrative enforcement against enterprises [2]. - The courts aim to support administrative authorities in lawfully performing their regulatory duties while also correcting illegal administrative enforcement actions, thereby maintaining market order and promoting trust in governance [2].