行政违法

Search documents
耒阳市城市更新建设发展有限公司毁坏林地被罚
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-09-04 07:54
Core Points - Yiyang City Urban Renewal Construction Development Co., Ltd. violated the Forest Law by clearing forest land without approval from the Yiyang Forestry Bureau and without a land use permit [1][4] - The company was fined 110,980 yuan, which is double the cost required for vegetation restoration, as per the Forest Law [1][5] Company Information - Yiyang City Urban Renewal Construction Development Co., Ltd. was established on July 11, 2019, with Li Xiaohua as the legal representative [5] - The company is a subsidiary of Yiyang Urban and Rural Development Construction Co., Ltd. [5]
最高法发布涉企行政强制典型案例 监督纠正违法行政强制行为
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-08-12 22:05
Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has released five typical cases involving administrative enforcement against enterprises, demonstrating its commitment to supervising and correcting illegal administrative enforcement actions to protect the legitimate rights and interests of business entities [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Enforcement Cases - The administrative authorities are required to perform regulatory duties such as administrative enforcement within the legal framework, including defined powers, scope, conditions, and procedures [1]. - In a specific case, a rafting company operating in Qiqihar, Heilongjiang Province, had its five rafting boats seized by the local cultural and tourism bureau due to a lack of registration, and the boats were not returned until April 2022 [1][2]. - The court ruled that the local bureau's seizure of the rafting boats was illegal, as the relevant regulations did not authorize such actions for unregistered entities, and ordered the return of the boats along with compensation for the losses incurred [2]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Court's Role - From 2022 to 2024, approximately 8% of first-instance administrative cases accepted by various levels of people's courts involved administrative enforcement against enterprises [2]. - The courts aim to support administrative authorities in lawfully performing their regulatory duties while also correcting illegal administrative enforcement actions, thereby maintaining market order and promoting trust in governance [2].