过去，滥用职权等违反执法规范行为饱受诟病。如何让行政执法既有力度又有温度，做到"该严则严、 当宽则宽，不缺位也不越位"？实践中，不少地区给出的答案是：涉企行政检查亮"码"，推动精准监 管、无事不扰成为新规范。 今年6月，河南省开封市生态环境局禹王台分局行政执法人员在进入企业检查前，需扫描企业专属二维 码，上传执法检查信息。当前，北京、贵州、重庆等多地也正在推行"扫码检查"制度，进一步强化执法 规范性。无论是日常巡查，还是突发情况、投诉举报等需紧急入企检查的情况，执法人员均须扫码亮证 方可进入企业。通过扫码记录，可对执法人员入企次数进行跟踪监督，最大限度减少扰企行为。 开展规范涉企执法专项行动，是党中央从战略和全局高度作出的重大决策部署。自今年3月专项行动开 展以来，各地不断规范涉企行政检查、创新有效执法方式，推动涉企行政检查既不越位也不缺位，让政 府更有为、企业更有感。 安徽省六安恒源机械有限公司主要生产水工机械设备，因监管要求较高，过去常年要接受环保、安全等 各类检查。"原来每月都有不同的部门来检查，现在一年也就来两三次，不影响企业正常的生产运 转。"公司总经理陈荣娜深切感受到执法方式的转变。如今执法不再是 ...

【深圳商报讯】（首席记者彭琰）按照市委今年批准的民主监督的计划，市政协近日召开规范涉企执法 专项民主监督调研座谈会，为进一步优化深圳营商环境建言献策。 （文章来源：深圳商报） 据悉，今年5月，市政协社会法制和民族宗教委组建民主监督小组，围绕涉企执法工作赴市场监管局开 展了调研监督，同时广泛发动各界别委员深入基层调研，通过提交社情民意、填写调查问卷等方式收集 问题建议。 参加本次座谈会的有国家税务总局深圳市税务局、市应急管理局、市人力资源和社会保障局、市生态环 境局、市市场监管局、市消防救援局等6部门。与会人员介绍了涉企执法的工作情况，并就问卷调查的 反馈结果进行回应。 参加会议的政协委员们认为，执法检查是法治政府建设中的重要一环，政府部门在建立协同机制、依靠 科技人工智能等技术开展智慧监督等方面取得了积极成效，要加大宣传力度，形成更多社会共识，要深 入推进规范执法，不断提升企业"获得感"，推动法治化营商环境取得新成效。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Shaanxi Province's Qian County is implementing measures to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, aiming to optimize the business environment through various initiatives and precise actions [1] Group 1: Establishing a Regulatory Framework - The focus on standardizing enterprise-related law enforcement is seen as a key strategy for improving the business environment, with top leadership personally overseeing the initiatives [2] - A special leadership group has been established to clarify the scope of key rectifications and tasks, along with the issuance of a specific action plan for concentrated rectification of ecological environment law enforcement [2] Group 2: Source Control and Transparency - Qian County has created a list of administrative law enforcement items and legal bases, which is publicly available on the Qian County People's website, allowing for public oversight and addressing issues like excessive inspections [3] Group 3: Long-term Governance - The approach includes a combination of immediate corrections and long-term solutions, with the issuance of discipline regulations and guidelines for law enforcement personnel to ensure compliance with policy requirements [4] Group 4: Technological Support - The county emphasizes a philosophy of "less disturbance, better prevention," utilizing methods like "positive lists + non-site supervision" and "double random, one public" checks to streamline inspections and reduce redundancy [5] Group 5: Credit-Based Regulation - A credit evaluation system for 26 enterprises has been implemented, allowing for differentiated regulatory measures based on credit risk, promoting a mechanism of incentives for trustworthy enterprises and stricter management for those with credit issues [6]

Group 1 - The introduction of the "environment code" for over 1,700 enterprises in Xi'an City aims to enhance environmental supervision and reduce the frequency of inspections [1][2] - The "environment code" system categorizes enterprises based on their environmental credit scores, with green codes indicating scores above 90, yellow codes for scores between 80 and 90, and red codes for scores below 80 [3][5] - The implementation of the smart regulatory platform has significantly reduced the number of on-site inspections while improving the efficiency and precision of enforcement [3][4] Group 2 - The smart regulatory platform allows real-time access to enterprise information, including energy consumption and pollution data, enhancing the ability of enforcement personnel to conduct checks [3][4] - The platform also serves as a resource for enterprises, providing access to environmental policies, legal standards, and case studies for self-assessment and improvement [5] - The initiative has been recognized as a model for optimizing the business environment in Shaanxi Province, with plans to extend the "environment code" to all 5,000 enterprises under pollution discharge management by the end of the year [5]

Group 1 - The core objective of the special action is to promote standardized law enforcement related to enterprises, addressing difficulties faced by businesses, and creating a conducive development environment [1][3] - The inspection team held a meeting to discuss the progress and challenges of the special action, emphasizing the importance of administrative law enforcement in shaping government image and public trust [3][8] - Various enforcement departments reported on their responsibilities and exchanged views on the challenges faced during law enforcement processes [3][6] Group 2 - The inspection team visited several companies to gather feedback from business leaders regarding law enforcement practices and to discuss standardization [5][6] - The team acknowledged the efforts made by the county government in implementing the special action and outlined requirements for further improvement, including enhancing law enforcement efficiency and optimizing service for businesses [8] - Emphasis was placed on adhering to local jurisdiction principles, establishing collaboration mechanisms, and prohibiting any form of coercive enforcement or profit-seeking behavior by law enforcement officials [8]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting of the Central Financial Committee emphasizes the need to regulate low-price disorderly competition among enterprises and promote the orderly exit of backward production capacity [1] Group 1: Market Regulation - The focus is on legally and systematically addressing low-price competition among enterprises to enhance product quality [1] - There will be a standardization of government procurement and bidding processes, with an emphasis on fairness in the review of bidding results [1] Group 2: Investment and Trade - The meeting calls for the regulation of local investment attraction and the enhancement of information disclosure related to investment [1] - It aims to promote the integration of domestic and foreign trade, facilitating the transition from export to domestic sales, and nurturing high-quality enterprises in both sectors [1] Group 3: Legal and Institutional Framework - Continuous efforts will be made to carry out special actions for regulating enterprise-related law enforcement [1] - The establishment of a favorable financial and tax system, statistical accounting system, and credit system to support market unification is highlighted [1]

有企业家总结道："求倾斜不如要公平，等扶持不如靠法律。"5月20日，民营经济促进法正式实施。作 为我国首部专为民营经济"量体裁衣"的基础性法律，它将长期以来支持民营经济发展的一系列政策、措 施以法律的方式固化下来，其中包括规范异地执法行为、禁止为经济利益等目的滥用职权实施异地执法 等内容。法律的生命力在于实施，要把法律善意最大化彰显出来，规制涉企行政执法行为，需要各地 区、各部门统筹推进各项配套规定尽早出台，协调推动各种支持保障措施落实落细，以法治之力切实激 发民营经济活力和创造力。 此外，强化监督至关重要。虽然我国已经建立起相对完善的监督机制，但在实际操作中，仍有部分制度 条款难以发挥有效作用，一些地方和部门对于违规执法行为的监督和问责力度不够。对此，司法行政部 门要建立涉企行政执法诉求沟通机制，组织开展行政执法检查，加强对行政执法活动的监督，及时纠正 不当行政执法行为；要创新监管方式，运用信息化手段提高监管效率和精准度，抑制地方政府违规执法 的冲动。面对当前复杂多变的经济环境，严格规范行政执法，确保执法权在法治的轨道内行使，无疑是 当下优化营商环境的"必修课"。 （文章来源：广州日报） 规范涉企执法，是市 ...

Core Points - The core viewpoint of the articles is the implementation and impact of the nationwide special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, which aims to improve the business environment and reduce unnecessary inspections [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Law Enforcement Actions - The special action to standardize administrative law enforcement was fully launched nationwide in March this year, with a reported problematic case amounting to 335 million yuan, recovering losses of 98.81 million yuan for enterprises by May 21 [1]. - The implementation of the "Opinions on Strictly Standardizing Inspections Related to Enterprises" has led to the development of inspection standards and frequency limits by relevant departments, significantly reducing unnecessary inspections [1]. - In Shenzhen, the establishment of the administrative law enforcement supervision code system has shown effectiveness, with the number of enterprise inspections in Guangming District decreasing from 3,323 to 1,135 since 2025, a reduction of 65.84% [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Improvements and Innovations - The comprehensive cleanup of existing enterprise-related charging policies and the timely update of the charging directory have been emphasized, along with strict compliance reviews of new policies to prevent the introduction of non-compliant charging policies [1]. - The Ministry of Justice is developing management measures for administrative law enforcement personnel to ensure that only qualified individuals perform enforcement duties, with 1,140 leads sent to disciplinary inspection agencies and 1,068 personnel dealt with since the start of the special action [2]. - The exploration of flexible enforcement methods, such as the "flexible enforcement" mechanism in Shenzhen's Longhua District, aims to create a better business environment by providing green channels for enterprises that voluntarily self-check and correct minor violations [2].

对于职能部门，明确了专项行动的目标，也就竖起了公正文明执法的信标，在具体操作中，工作人员可 以"按图索骥"，更加精准、高效地锁定和查处"乱收费、乱罚款、乱检查、乱查封"等问题。而将各种典 型问题归纳"集成"，划定了更加醒目的权力界线，既表明了纠正乱象、监管权力的决心态度，也震慑 了"寻租者"，手莫伸、伸手必被捉。 规范涉企行政执法行为，必须下猛药、祛顽疾。从长远来看，还需要强化源头治理，加快立法进程，修 订行政处罚法、价格法等法律，以及涉企收费违法违规行为处理办法等配套性法规，避免收费政策"带 病运行"，真正用制度的笼子关住权力。 不仅要规范涉企执法、持续优化营商环境，相关部门更要帮助企业发展，当好服务企业的"店小二"。明 确开展涉企行政执法专项行动目标，与法治政府相向而行，迈出了服务市场、扶助企业的重要一步。 规范涉企执法工作被三令五申，一提再提。去年年底召开的中央经济工作会议，就明确提出"开展规范 涉企执法专项行动"；今年的政府工作报告，也将开展规范涉企行政执法专项行动作为一项重要任务。4 月25日召开的中共中央政治局会议，对此又予以强调，"加快全国统一大市场建设，扎实开展规范涉企 执法专项行动"。 一项 ...

Core Viewpoint - The special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises aims to protect the legitimate rights and interests of private enterprises and entrepreneurs, ensuring a fair and lawful business environment [1][2]. Group 1: Overview of the Special Action - The special action was launched nationwide since March, with 6,232 problem clues collected and 5,246 cases urged for handling by May 21 [1]. - The total amount involved in the rectified cases reached 335 million yuan, recovering losses of approximately 9.88135 million yuan for enterprises [1]. Group 2: Legislative and Regulatory Framework - The implementation of the "Law on Promoting the Private Economy" on May 20 further clarifies the legal principles and institutional basis for standardizing administrative law enforcement [1]. - The action is a significant measure to implement the decisions of the Central Committee and the State Council, aiming to enhance the legal requirements for law enforcement [2]. Group 3: Specific Measures and Strategies - The action will focus on key areas, including strict investigation of unauthorized fees and charges by government departments and associations, as well as ensuring compliance in policy reviews [3]. - A monitoring platform for enterprise-related fees will be established to identify potential risks, and a mechanism for sharing and quickly addressing problem clues will be developed [3]. - The revision of the "Price Law" and the introduction of regulations on handling illegal fee behaviors are planned to strengthen legal guarantees and deter violations [3]. Group 4: Enforcement Personnel and Standards - The quality and capability of law enforcement personnel are crucial for the effectiveness of the enforcement actions, with efforts underway to establish clear norms for administrative law enforcement behavior [4].