Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that the rule of law is the best business environment, with significant reforms in administrative law enforcement aimed at reducing burdens on enterprises [1] - In the past year, the number of enterprise inspections in Huai'an decreased by 51.2% year-on-year, with 13,074 cases of leniency or exemption from penalties processed, resulting in a financial relief of 266 million yuan for businesses [1] - Huai'an's local private enterprises ranked first in the province for satisfaction with the business environment, indicating a continuous improvement in the sense of gain for business entities [1] Group 2 - The focus for this year includes deepening the application of special actions for regulating enterprise law enforcement, particularly through "law enforcement supervision + on-demand services" to address enterprises' needs for guidance rather than inspections [1] - A series of measures will be implemented to encourage more administrative law enforcement agencies to adopt flexible enforcement methods, effectively reducing burdens and increasing efficiency for enterprises [1]

今年贵州省两会推出"两会会客厅"特别节目，邀请部分代表委员和列席参加开幕式的省直单位主要负责同志，围绕贵州"十五五"规划和《政府工作报告》， 结合各自部门工作职能职责，分享"十四五"时期我省相关工作取得的发展成就和接下来贯彻落实省两会精神的具体举措。 今年贵州省政府工作报告再次明确要持续优化营商环境，培育壮大经营主体。法治监管是市场经济健康运行的保障。优化营商环境不仅需要放宽准入，更需 创新监管，减少对正常经营的干扰。接下来如何持续提升市场监管效能，形成既"放得活"又"管得好"的经济秩序？动静记者采访了贵州省人大代表，贵州省 市场监管局党组书记、局长吴东来。 贵州省人大代表贵州省市场监管局党组书记、局长吴东来 主持人：省市场监管局在规范涉企执法方面做了哪些工作？ 吴东来：为经营主体高质量发展提供稳定、可预期的法治环境，是市场监管部门义不容辞的职责和使命。2025年，省市场监管局以企业反映强烈的重复检 查、多头检查、小过重罚等突出问题为重点，组织全省市场监管部门深入开展涉企执法专项行动。全省市场监管系统涉企检查计划精简38.01%，"双随机"检 查次数下降63.3%，检查企业户次数下降2.6%，实现检查计划、频 ...

浙江提出，让企业安心放心发展。 作为中国的民营经济大省和强省，浙江省在去年揭晓的"中国民营企业500强""中国制造业民营企业500 强"等五大榜单中，连续两年包揽上榜数量榜首，其中"中国民营企业500强"上榜数量更是连续27年保持 全国第一。 不只是浙江，随着长三角一体化发展的深入推进，整个长三角地区也在持续为民营经济清障赋能。 2025年底，江苏、上海、浙江、安徽三省一市市场监管部门联合出台了《严格规范长三角地区市场监管 异地执法行为八项举措》（下称《八项举措》），通过发挥长三角市场监管执法协作的优势，防范违规 异地执法和趋利性执法。 《八项举措》率先在全国进一步明确和规范了市场监管领域的异地执法行为，提出了规范案件协查程 序、规范执法取证行为、慎施行政强制措施、统一行政处罚裁量、推进管辖争议化解、建立案件会商机 制、畅通问题反映通道、强化异地执法监督等举措。 安徽省印发的《创建市场化法治化国际化一流营商环境对标提升举措（2025版）》也提出，强化行政执 法行为监督。畅通行政执法问题反映渠道，建立行政执法情况定期评估机制，加大对违法违规执法行为 警示、整改力度。开展规范涉企行政执法专项整治，突出整治趋利性执 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Hefei Economic and Technological Development Zone is implementing reforms to streamline enterprise inspections, reducing the burden on businesses by consolidating multiple inspections into a single comprehensive check [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Improvements - The Hefei city disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies are focusing on standardizing enterprise-related law enforcement as a means to enhance the business environment [1]. - A "comprehensive check once" reform has been initiated, allowing for the integration of various departmental inspections into a single visit, effectively achieving "one entry, multiple checks" [1][2]. Group 2: Local Initiatives - Local disciplinary inspection and supervision bodies, such as in Lujiang County, are collaborating with various enforcement departments to implement a joint inspection plan, which reduces the inspection burden on enterprises [2]. - The establishment of a supervisory group in Luyang District aims to ensure that enterprise-related administrative law enforcement is conducted in a lawful and orderly manner [2]. Group 3: Addressing Business Concerns - The Hefei city agencies are actively monitoring issues such as inefficiency and negligence among enforcement personnel, ensuring that urgent business concerns are addressed promptly [2]. - In Changfeng County, a specialized action has been initiated to engage with enterprises directly, allowing for immediate responses to their needs and establishing a closed-loop management mechanism for enterprise requests [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of regulating administrative law enforcement related to enterprises to create a fair and just business environment, which is essential for economic development and public trust in government [3][4][16]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions and Initiatives - The "supervision of supervision" approach is being implemented to address corruption in administrative law enforcement, focusing on issues like arbitrary fees and fines [3][4]. - A nationwide special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises was launched in March, with the Ministry of Justice overseeing the initiative [3][4]. - Local governments, such as Wuxi in Jiangsu Province, are establishing monitoring points in private enterprises to gather feedback and improve service efficiency [6][14]. Group 2: Case Studies and Enforcement - A case in Wuxi involved a deputy director of a market supervision bureau being sentenced to five years for accepting bribes, highlighting the issue of abuse of discretion in law enforcement [7][8]. - Hubei Province's disciplinary inspection agencies have identified and addressed numerous issues related to administrative law enforcement, recovering significant economic losses for enterprises [9][10]. Group 3: Data Utilization and Technology - The use of big data and information technology is being promoted to enhance the efficiency of supervision and reduce interference in normal business operations [13][17]. - Local governments are developing data models to identify irregularities in law enforcement, which helps in proactive monitoring and enforcement [13]. Group 4: Long-term Mechanisms and Improvements - The article discusses the need for establishing long-term mechanisms to ensure transparency and accountability in law enforcement, including the creation of information platforms [11][17]. - Continuous efforts are being made to refine administrative procedures and reduce unnecessary checks on enterprises, thereby fostering a more stable business environment [14][17].

Core Points - The province is advancing a special action to standardize enterprise-related law enforcement, aiming to enhance the normalization, transparency, and rule of law in administrative law enforcement related to enterprises [1][2] - A comprehensive clue investigation system has been established to identify enforcement pain points, with measures such as public announcements for clue collection and random checks of enforcement cases [1] - The province is implementing flexible enforcement measures, such as "comprehensive checks once" and "non-site enforcement," resulting in a significant reduction in the frequency of enterprise inspections [1] - The province has focused on addressing issues of inaction and misconduct, having investigated 2,762 related cases and reported 193 typical cases to promote systemic governance [2] Group 1 - The province is committed to continuous problem rectification and effectiveness enhancement, establishing a long-term mechanism for standardized enterprise-related law enforcement [1] - A significant reduction in enterprise inspection frequency has been achieved through the adoption of flexible enforcement measures, ensuring enforcement is both effective and considerate [1] - The province has established a social supervision network with 866 enterprise contact points and 1,972 social supervisors to facilitate direct feedback from enterprises [1] Group 2 - The province's judicial department will focus on deepening problem investigation and rectification, promoting smart law enforcement applications, and enhancing the long-term mechanism and law enforcement team capabilities [2] - Measures will be taken to prevent the resurgence of fragmented enforcement and multiple inspections by increasing case file checks and broadening clue collection channels [2] - The establishment of an integrated law enforcement supervision platform will ensure the traceability and supervision of the entire law enforcement process [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the progress and ongoing efforts in regulating law enforcement practices related to enterprises, particularly focusing on curbing illegal cross-regional enforcement and profit-driven enforcement, which have significantly impacted private enterprises [2][7]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions and Achievements - Since the launch of the special action to standardize law enforcement related to enterprises, issues such as illegal cross-regional enforcement and profit-driven enforcement have been effectively curbed, contributing to high-quality development [2]. - As of September 21, the initiative has helped recover over 15 billion yuan for enterprises, indicating a positive outcome from the regulatory efforts [2][6]. Group 2: Recommendations for Improvement - It is essential to sever the profit chain associated with illegal cross-regional enforcement and profit-driven enforcement to prevent such occurrences from the source [3]. - Legal experts suggest that the revenue from penalties should be transferred from local to central government oversight to fundamentally disconnect enforcement from profit motives [4]. Group 3: Legal and Institutional Enhancements - There is a need to improve regulations and institutional frameworks to close loopholes that allow illegal enforcement practices to persist [5]. - The implementation of the "Regulations on the Jurisdiction of Cross-Provincial Criminal Cases Involving Enterprises" aims to clarify jurisdictional authority, ensuring that cases are handled by the primary crime location's law enforcement [5]. Group 4: Corrective Mechanisms and Future Directions - A strict corrective mechanism is necessary to provide both remedy and deterrence against illegal practices, with recent cases highlighting the protection of private enterprises and their owners' rights [6]. - The article emphasizes that while progress has been made, further efforts are required to ensure all recoverable losses are returned to affected enterprises, and to hold accountable those involved in illegal enforcement practices [6][8].

Core Viewpoint - The recent special action to regulate law enforcement related to enterprises has effectively curbed issues such as illegal cross-regional law enforcement and profit-driven law enforcement, further standardizing law enforcement and supporting high-quality development [1][4]. Group 1: Achievements and Impact - Since the launch of the special action, over 15 billion yuan has been recovered for enterprises by addressing illegal cross-regional law enforcement and profit-driven law enforcement issues [1][3]. - The action has particularly benefited private enterprises, which have been the most affected by these illegal practices [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Improvements - There is a need to sever the profit chain associated with illegal cross-regional and profit-driven law enforcement by transferring penalty revenues from local to central government oversight [1]. - The implementation of the "Regulations on the Jurisdiction of Cross-Provincial Criminal Cases Involving Enterprises" has clarified jurisdictional authority, ensuring that cases are handled by the police in the main crime area [2]. Group 3: Corrective Mechanisms - The Supreme Court has released typical cases for retrial that protect the rights of private enterprises and entrepreneurs, emphasizing principles such as legality and equal protection [3]. - The legal framework allows victims of illegal law enforcement to seek compensation, holding responsible parties accountable through potential disciplinary and criminal penalties [3]. Group 4: Future Directions - Continued efforts are necessary to address illegal law enforcement practices, focusing on root causes, regulatory improvements, corrective measures, and accountability for responsible individuals [4].

Group 1 - The Ministry of Public Security has effectively curbed issues such as illegal cross-regional law enforcement and profit-driven law enforcement, contributing to improved social security [1][2] - In 2024, the number of criminal cases filed nationwide decreased by 25.7% year-on-year, indicating a positive trend in law enforcement effectiveness [1] - The Ministry has implemented reforms to ensure that all reports are accepted, accurately recorded, and legally filed, enhancing the quality of case handling [1] Group 2 - The government has initiated special actions to regulate law enforcement related to enterprises, addressing issues like illegal cross-regional arrests and asset seizures [2][4] - The "Marine Fishing" law enforcement issue, where law enforcement agencies unlawfully capture entrepreneurs across regions, has gained public attention [2] - The newly enacted Private Economy Promotion Law emphasizes the need to standardize cross-regional law enforcement and establish a cooperative system [4] Group 3 - Since the launch of the special action to regulate administrative law enforcement, over 15 billion yuan has been recovered for enterprises, highlighting the effectiveness of these measures [6]

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Public Security emphasizes the importance of strengthening law enforcement supervision and management to minimize enforcement issues and ensure case quality [1] Group 1: Law Enforcement Supervision - The focus is on enhancing closed-loop law enforcement supervision to effectively reduce enforcement problems [1] - There is a call to strengthen problem rectification and utilize administrative review, criminal review, and state compensation mechanisms [1] Group 2: Protection of Rights - The establishment of complaint and reporting platforms is highlighted to safeguard the legitimate rights of parties involved [1] - Special governance initiatives are being launched to address issues raised by the public, particularly in relation to enterprise-related law enforcement [1] Group 3: Regulatory Actions - Since the launch of the special action to standardize law enforcement related to enterprises, issues such as illegal cross-regional enforcement and profit-driven enforcement have been effectively curbed [1] - The regulation of enterprise-related law enforcement has been further improved, contributing positively to high-quality development [1]