Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Intellectual Property Prosecutor's Office by the Supreme People's Procuratorate marks a significant step towards the professionalization and comprehensive development of intellectual property judicial protection in China [1][2] Group 1: Establishment and Functionality - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has recently established the Intellectual Property Prosecutor's Office, which will participate in the supervision of "illegal cross-regional law enforcement and profit-driven law enforcement" [1] - The office aims to enhance the judicial protection of intellectual property rights and will focus on combating new types of crimes involving advanced technologies such as deep linking, web crawling, and electronic intrusion [1] Group 2: Statistics and Trends - In the past year, national procuratorial authorities accepted the arrest of 13,486 individuals for intellectual property crimes and prosecuted 33,805 individuals [2] - Among the types of cases, 81% were related to trademark infringement, with significant increases in copyright and trade secret infringement cases, where joint criminal activity accounted for approximately 80% [2] - The number of cases involving trade secret infringement rose by 12.4% year-on-year, with 163 cases involving 385 individuals in 2024 [2] Group 3: Future Directions - The Supreme People's Procuratorate plans to conduct regular supervision of malicious litigation and deepen collaboration with relevant departments to create a market-oriented, law-based, and international business environment [2]

司法部副部长王振江8日在国新办新闻发布会上表示，下一步，推动建立健全行政执法违法行为投诉举 报处理机制，及时受理并依法处理涉企行政执法投诉举报。司法行政机关建立行政执法监督企业联系 点，及时听取各类经营主体对涉企行政执法的意见建议。推行行政执法监督员制度，邀请人大代表、政 协委员、人民监督员、专家学者、律师、新闻工作者等参与监督。坚决遏制趋利性执法，切实依法保护 民营经济组织及其经营者合法权益。 ...

4月27日，最高人民法院发布《关于坚持严格公正司法规范涉企案件审判执行工作的通知》（以下简称《通知》），要求各级法院依法平等保护各种所有制 经济产权，防止和纠正利用行政、刑事手段干预经济纠纷，严禁对涉企案件扩张管辖、人为制造异地管辖，防止和纠正执法司法中的地方保护主义，依法规 范适用查封、扣押、冻结措施和失信惩戒措施，最大限度降低对企业正常生产经营活动的影响。 这是继今年3月公安部印发《公安机关跨省涉企犯罪案件管辖规定》和全国检察机关4月部署"违规异地执法和趋利性执法司法专项监督"工作以来，最高司法 机关再次针对涉企异地执法司法发布专项政策指引。这些动作表明，一段时间以来出现的诸多涉企异地执法司法乱象，不仅引起中央层面高度重视，还针对 性地出台了应对整治措施。尤其是最高法院《通知》的出台，相信可以成为自源头上有效遏制涉企趋利性执法的司法屏障。 首先，从《通知》出台的背景看，近年来一些引起社会广泛关注的跨省趋利性执法现象（俗称"远洋捕捞"）无疑是直接动因。有研究明确指出，自2023年以 来，异地侦查后移交检察机关提起公诉的案件明显增多。而且，异地涉企刑事司法案件涉及的对象几乎都是注册地在广东、江苏、浙江等沿海发 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has issued a notification emphasizing the prevention of illegal extraterritorial law enforcement and profit-driven judicial practices, addressing local protectionism in handling enterprise-related cases [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Guidelines - The notification mandates the strict implementation of the case registration system, ensuring the protection of parties' litigation rights and prohibiting delays or selective case registrations [2][5]. - It emphasizes the principle of legal jurisdiction, prohibiting the expansion of jurisdiction for profit-driven purposes and ensuring that civil cases are not dismissed under criminal pretenses [2][4]. - The notification highlights the need to distinguish between economic disputes and criminal offenses, reinforcing legal principles such as equality before the law and the presumption of innocence [5][6]. Group 2: Addressing Local Protectionism - The issue of local protectionism in the judiciary is underscored, with calls for reforms to ensure the uniform application of national laws and to mitigate the influence of local interests [4][6]. - The notification reiterates the importance of preventing the artificial creation of extraterritorial jurisdiction and the expansion of jurisdiction based on local interests [4][5]. - Legal experts have pointed out that the misuse of jurisdiction is often linked to local protectionism, particularly in cases involving online and economic crimes [2][3]. Group 3: Enforcement Measures - The notification specifies the need for precise application of asset seizure and freezing measures, ensuring that such actions do not unduly impact normal business operations [6]. - It calls for the differentiation between illegal gains and legitimate assets, prohibiting the seizure of unrelated properties [6]. - The notification also emphasizes the need for fair judicial review of administrative cases involving enterprises, aiming to rectify issues such as arbitrary fines and inspections [6].

近段时间，备受社会各界期待的民营经济促进法草案迎来二审，立法进程加速。全国政协委员，上海新联会会长、金杜律师事务所高级合伙人张毅长期关注 民营经济促进法立法相关工作，在接受证券时报记者专访时，张毅表示，民营经济促进法针对大量具体情况作出了细致规定，可执行性强。目前，草案二审 稿已趋于完善，也可考虑适当增加追究责任人责任的有关条款。 今年全国两会，张毅更加关注如何整治"内卷式"竞争、维护公平竞争市场秩序，他认为，"内卷式"竞争本质是不正当竞争，建议将不正当竞争行为等纳入信 用评级，与政府支持、市场准入、招投标和融资等挂钩，推动建立公平竞争市场环境的诚信体系基础。 （全国政协委员，上海新联会会长、金杜律师事务所高级合伙人张毅） 法治是最好的营商环境。 民营经济促进法草案趋于完善 证券时报记者：您对于民营经济促进法有何看法？您对草案中哪些条款印象较深？对于草案是否有修改意见？ 张毅： 我体会民营经济促进法有两大亮点。一是确定了基本原则，包括平等对待、公平竞争、同等保护等，奠定了民营经济的法律地位，明确民营经济是社 会主义市场经济的重要组成部分，是推进中国式现代化的生力军。二是针对大量具体情况作出了细致规定，可执行性 ...