Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the negative impact of malicious video editing on public figures like Lei Jun and Tim, highlighting how original content can be distorted to create misleading narratives, leading to public backlash and misinterpretation of their statements [5][12][18]. Group 1: Impact of Video Editing - Lei Jun faced backlash after a statement about car design was taken out of context, leading to accusations of prioritizing aesthetics over safety [1][9]. - Tim's video was similarly misrepresented, with a humorous segment being edited to suggest he looked down on ordinary people, creating a false narrative of class conflict [3][12]. - Both cases illustrate how video snippets, once a tool for positive engagement, have turned into instruments of misinformation [7][13]. Group 2: Evolution of Video Snippets - Initially, video snippets helped figures like Lei Jun gain popularity by highlighting humorous or impactful moments, such as his "Are you OK" phrase during a product launch [8][16]. - The shift from positive to negative editing reflects a broader change in content consumption, where sensationalism and conflict drive engagement over context and accuracy [12][17]. - The article emphasizes that the same tools that once aided in building reputations are now being used to undermine them [11][18]. Group 3: Industry and Platform Responsibility - The article calls for clearer regulations around video snippets, emphasizing the need for proper authorization and ethical standards in content creation [17][18]. - It suggests that platforms should adjust algorithms to promote accurate content rather than sensationalized snippets, which often mislead viewers [12][18]. - The need for creators to proactively protect their content by emphasizing key messages and clarifying context is highlighted as a necessary strategy [17][18].